Page 45 - 《中国医疗器械杂志》2025年第6期

Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2025年 第49卷 第6期

综 合 评 述

intervertebral lumbar cages produced using fused filament [29] NEWSOM E T, SADEGHPOUR A, ENTEZARI A, et al.
fabrication[J]. J Mater Res, 2018, 33(14): 2040-2051. Design and evaluation of 3D-printed Sr-Ht-Gahnite
[16] CHEN P, SU J, WANG H Z, et al. Mechanical properties bioceramic for FDA regulatory submission: a good
and microstructure characteristics of lattice-surfaced peek laboratory practice sheep study[J]. Acta Biomater, 2023,
cage fabricated by high-temperature laser powder bed 156: 214-221.
fusion[J]. J Mater Sci Technol, 2022, 125: 105-117. [30] ROITERO E, LE BOTERFF J, CHEVALIER J, et al.
[17] ZHENG J B, ZHAO H Y, OUYANG Z C, et al. Addressing challenges in additive manufacturing of
Additively-manufactured PEEK/HA porous scaffolds polylactic acid -p(l, dl)la- and bio-glass composites for
with excellent osteogenesis for bone tissue repairing[J]. implantable medical devices[J]. Prog Addit Manuf, 2025:
Compos B Eng, 2022, 232: 109508. 1-16.
[18] ZHANG Y M, YANG J Z, WAN W T, et al. Evaluation [31] DU X, RONAYNE S, LEE S S, et al. 3D-printed
of biological performance of 3D printed trabecular porous PEEK/Silicon Nitride scaffolds with a triply periodic
tantalum spine fusion cage in large animal models[J]. J minimal surface structure for spinal fusion implants[J].
Orthop Transl, 2025, 50: 185-195. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2023, 6(8): 3319-3329.
[19] LIANG H, TU J Y, WANG B J, et al. Innovative 3d- [32] BASGUL C, DESANTIS P, DERR T, et al. Exploring the
printed porous tantalum cage with non-window design to mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and
accelerate spinal fusion: a proof-of-concept study[J]. bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-peek composites
in cervical spinal cages[J]. Int J Bioprint, 2024, 10(2):
Mater Today Bio, 2025, 31: 101576.
2124.
[20] ZHANG H, GUO Z C, ZHANG Z H, et al. Biomimetic
[33] 高娜, 张博, 孙钰朋, 等. 前沿椎间融合器产品评价关注
design and fabrication of PEEK and PEEK/CF cage with
重点研究[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2024, 21(2):
minimal surface structures by fused filament
82-87.
fabrication[J]. J Mater Res Technol, 2023, 26: 5001-5015.
[34] 方家栋, 杨黎, 胡正霞, 等. 可降解脊柱椎间融合器的研
[21] FISCHETTI T, GRAZIANI G, GHEZZI D, et al.
究进展[J]. 四川医学, 2023(5): 548-551.
Combining 3D printing and cryostructuring to tackle
[35] 刘伟, 赵京生, 王祎霖, 等. 3D打印不同骨密度的椎间融
infection and spine fusion[J]. Adv Mater Technol, 2024,
合器优化设计[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志, 2024, 48(1): 20-
9(5): 2301301.
25.
[22] LIU Y C, WU H, BAO S S, et al. Clinical application of
[36] 王洋. 增材制造技术下颈椎零切迹椎间融合器的拓扑
3D‐ printed biodegradable lumbar interbody cage
优化设计及性能研究[D]. 吉林: 吉林大学, 2024.
(polycaprolactone/β‐tricalcium phosphate) for posterior
[37] WANG H W, WAN Y, LI Q H, et al. Multiscale design
lumbar interbody fusion[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl
and biomechanical evaluation of porous spinal fusion
Biomater, 2023, 111(7): 1398-1406.
cage to realize specified mechanical properties[J]. Biodes
[23] GUO X W, XU H C, ZHANG F, et al. Bioabsorbable
Manuf, 2021, 5(2): 277-293.
high-purity magnesium interbody cage: degradation,
[38] FOGEL G, MARTIN N, LYNCH K, et al. Subsidence
interbody fusion, and biocompatibility from a goat
and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody
cervical spine model[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(17):
cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous
1054-1054.
endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological
[24] DAENTZER D, WILLBOLD E, KALLA K, et al.
analysis[J]. Spine J, 2022, 22(6): 1028-1037.
Bioabsorbable interbody magnesium-polymer cage[J]. [39] LEWANDROWSKI K U, VIRA S, ELFAR J, et al.
Spine, 2014, 39(20): E1220-E1227.
Advancements in custom 3D-printed titanium interbody
[25] XU H C, ZHANG F, WANG H L, et al. Evaluation of a spinal fusion cages and their relevance in personalized
porous bioabsorbable interbody Mg-Zn alloy cage in a spine care[J]. J Pers Med, 2024, 14(8): 809.
goat cervical spine model[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: [40] VAN DEN BRINK W, LAMERIGTS N. Complete
1-10. osseointegration of a retrieved 3D printed porous titanium
[26] JIAO Z, CHI P, ZOU H, et al. Manufacturing and cervical cage[J]. Front Surg, 2020, 7: 526020.
degrading features of 3D-printed porous spinal interbody [41] FUKUDA A, TAKEMOTO M, SAITO T, et al.
fusion cages[J]. Int J Bioprinting, 2024, 10(4): 1996. Osteoinduction of porous Ti implants with a channel
[27] ABDAL HAY A, RAVEENDRAN N T, FOURNIER B, structure fabricated by selective laser melting[J]. Acta
et al. Fabrication of biocompatible and bioabsorbable Biomater, 2011, 7(5): 2327-2336.
polycaprolactone/magnesium hydroxide 3D printed [42] WALSH W R, PELLETIER M H, WANG T, et al. Does
scaffolds: degradation and osteoblasts interactions[J]. implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed
Compos B Eng, 2020, 197: 108158. porous implants?[J]. Spine J, 2019, 19(11): 1885-1898.
[28] KANG H, HOLLISTER S J, LA MARCA F, et al. Porous [43] TANIGUCHI N, FUJIBAYASHI S, TAKEMOTO M, et
biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and al. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous
fabrication using integrated global-local topology titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing:
optimization with laser sintering[J]. J Biomech Eng, an in vivo experiment[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol
2013, 135(10): 101013-101018. Appl, 2016, 59: 690-701.
631