Page 36 - 《上海体育大学学报》2025年第8期

张丽军. 中小学体育教师教研行动的价值意蕴、现实困境与破解之策

97-107 ［14］ 李宝庆，李淑斌. “五育融合” 视域下校本教研创新的内
［ 7 ］ 朱永新. 教研制度：强国建设的教育基石 [J]. 教育研究， 在逻辑与实践路径 [J]. 中国教育学刊，2022（11）：27-32
2024，45（1）：80-88 ［15］ 邵天逸，李启迪. 从粗放走向规范：我国学校体育思想研
［ 8 ］ 赵富学，程传银. 基于体育教师 PCK 结构的课例研修程 究的问题审思与路向转换 [J]. 体育科学，2023，43（5）：
序研究 [J]. 首都体育学院学报，2018，30（2）：160-165 89-97
［ 9 ］ 刘东方，景敏，赵欣言. 校本教研模式重构：问题与循证 [J]. ［16］ 张丽军，孙有平. 课程改革语境下体育教师赋权增能行动
东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版），2023（6）：116-122 困境的表现、成因与出路 [J]. 体育学刊，2022，29（1）：
［10］ 吴南中，陈恩伦，吴云. 有组织教研：人工智能环境下教师 130-137
研修的有序进化 [J]. 电化教育研究，2024，45（1）：122-128 ［17］ 季浏. 我国《义务教育体育与健康课程标准（2022 年版）》
［11］ 吴洪富，范春梅. 重塑高校教师专业学习共同体：走出教 解读 [J]. 体育科学，2022，42（5）：3-17
学发展的集体行动困境 [J]. 高教探索，2017（3）：113-117 ［18］ 尚力沛. 中小学高质量体育教研建设的价值、框架及路
［12］ 吴立宝，栗肖飞. 中小学校本教研的困境、成因与突破路 径 [J]. 体育学刊，2024，31（3）：110-117
径 [J]. 课程·教材·教法，2019，39（6）：125-130 ［19］ 赵敏，蔺海沣. 校本教研共同体建构：从“共存” 走向“共
［13］ 王艳玲，胡惠闵. 从三级到五级：我国基础教育教研制度 生”[J]. 教育研究，2016，37（12）：112-119
建设的进展与问题 [J]. 全球教育展望，2020，49（12）：66- ［20］ 王水泉. 体育课根本目标与根本内容的偏离与匡正 [J].
77 上海体育大学学报，2024，48（2）：1-13

Value Implications, Current Dilemmas and Practical Paths in the Teaching and
Research Activities of Physical Education Teachers in Primary and Secondary

Schools

ZHANG Lijun

Abstract：To maintain and realize the goals and tasks of physical education (PE) teaching and research in primary
and secondary schools in the new era, it is necessary to focus on the teaching and research activities of PE teachers.
The study finds that the value implications of the teaching and research activities of PE teachers in primary and
secondary schools includes promoting the high-level development of PE teaching and research, leading the
teachers' sustainable growth, improving the accurate solution of PE teaching problems, and serving the
implementation of the teaching reform of PE curriculum in basic education. The participants in the teaching and
research activities of PE teachers are reward power leaders (PE teaching and research staff), authoritative power
ruler (primary and secondary school principals), reference power holders (external sports experts) and related
stakeholders (primary and secondary school PE teachers' peers, students). And, the influencing factor are the
binding factors (institutional regulation), active factors (value orientation), and mediating factors (the role of the
situation) . On the other hand, the practical dilemma of teaching and research activities of PE teachers in primary
and secondary schools are shown as followed: ① The teaching and research willingness and conditions of PE
teachers are insufficient; ② The teachers' responsibilities and task objectives are unclear; ③ The administrative
tendency of teaching and research management and operation is obvious; And ④ there is an excessive
utilitarianism of PE teaching and research evaluation system. It is proposed to improve PE teaching and research
system and working methods, strengthen the construction of PE teaching and research teams, clarify the admission
standards for PE researchers, reshape the value concept of PE teaching and research and optimize its guarantee
mechanism. The other practical paths include establishing the research status of PE teachers and breaking their
habitual concepts of teaching and research.
Keywords：school sports; physical education teaching and research; physical education teacher in primary and
secondary schools; teaching and research activities
Author's address： Department of Physical Education, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072,
Shaanxi, China

32