Page 29 - 《运动与健康科学》(英文)2024年第2期
P. 29
TaggedAPTARAEndResistance training volume effects on menopause 151
Table 2 (Continued)
a
Study (country)TaggedAPTARAEnd ExerciseTaggedAPTARAEnd RT prescriptionTaggedAPTARAEnd RT volume group TaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARATbody
48
Phillips et al. (2012), USATaggedAPTARAEnd 10 exercises: chest press, lat pull-down, seated 812 RM, 812 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise, HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
rows, shoulder press, leg abduction, leg adduc- 1.5 min recovery between sets and 2 min recovery
tion, chest flys, leg press, leg curl, and leg between exercises, 3 times/week for 12 weeks;
extensionTaggedAPTARAEnd Adherence was 100%TaggedAPTARAEnd
74
Ribeiro et al. (2020), BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd 8 exercises: chest press, seated row, triceps push- 812 RM, 812 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise, LVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
down, preacher curl, horizontal leg press, knee 12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 8
extension, knee curl, and seated calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd
weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
75
Tomeleri et al. (2016), BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd 8 exercises: chest press, horizontal leg press, 1015 RM, 1015 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise, HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
seated row, knee extension, preacher curl (free 12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
weights), leg curl, triceps pushdown, and seated recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 8
calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
76
Tomeleri et al. (2018)a; BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd 8 exercises: chest press, seated row, triceps push- 1015 RM, 1015 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise, HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
down, preacher curl, horizontal leg press, knee 12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
extension, knee curl, and seated calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 12
weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
77
Tomeleri et al. (2018)b; BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd 8 exercises: chest press, seated row, triceps push- 1015 RM, 1015 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise, HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
down, preacher curl, horizontal leg press, knee 12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
extension, knee curl, and seated calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 12
weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
78
Urzi et al. (2019), SloveniaTaggedAPTARAEnd 8 exercises: chair squats; band seated: biceps curl, 1214 (BORG), 9 (512) reps/exercise, 2 (13) LVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
seated row, knee extension, leg press, and hip sets/exercise, 12 min recovery between sets,
abduction; and standing behind the chair: knee 3 times/week for 12 weeks; Adherence was
flexion and calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd »88%TaggedAPTARAEnd
a
Total volume = number of exercises £ number of sets per exercise £ number of reps per exercise £ number of exercise sessions per week £ weeks of interven-
tion (LVRT and HVRT were separated by the median value, 6480 arbitrary units).
Abbreviations: BORG = Borg rate of perceived exertion scale; CR-10 = adapted Borg scale; DUP = daily undulating periodization; HVRT = high-volume resis-
tance training; LVRT = low-volume resistance training; NP = non-periodized; OMNI-RES = Omni resistance scale; reps = repetitions; RM = repetition maximum;
RPE = rating of perceived exertion; RT-DUP = resistance training performed with daily undulating periodization; RT-EB = resistance training performed with
traditional elastic bands; RT-ET = resistance training performed with elastic tubes with handles; RT-F2 = resistance training performed 2 times per week; RT-
F3 = resistance training performed 3 times per week; RT-NP = non-periodized resistance training; RT-NPR = resistance training performed with narrow-pyramid
system; RT-WPR = resistance training performed with wide-pyramid system.
week or 812 repetitions per set, we used the mean value (e.g., excluding duplicate records and papers based on title and
2.5 and 10, respectively) to calculate the total volume. The abstract, 50 studies were assessed according to the PICOS
LVRT and HVRT were divided according to median total eligibility criteria. Subsequently, 30 studies were excluded for
not meeting the inclusion criteria. Therefore, 20 RCTs (RT
volume (6480 arbitrary units).TaggedAPTARAEnd
TaggedAPTARAPThe RT intensity was not included in the total training groups (n = 26) and CG (n = 20)) 52,6178 were included in the
volume calculation for the following reasons: 60 (a) although qualitative and quantitative synthesis: 19 investigations with
the %1RMRM relationship may be used in field practice, body adiposity data, 52,6164,6678 9 studies with serum inflam-
48,52,65,66,68,7578
research to date does not support the widespread use of these matory data, and 9 with serum metabolic
52,6466,68,70,75,77,78
tables for establishing training loads for every exercise (e.g., data (Table 1). Only 1 study did not provide
48
equipment: machine and free weights; muscle groups: single inflammatory data. Moreover, all studies included in both the
joints and multiple joints); (b) the most accurate relationship qualitative and quantitative synthesis presented an overall risk
between the %1RMRM is for loads greater than 75% of the of bias for all outcomes characterized by some concerns,
1RM and fewer than 10 repetitions, which was not a except 1 study which presented an overall high risk of bias
common exercise intensity in the majority of the studies (Fig. 2). A funnel plot was constructed using the standardized
included in this review; and (c) some studies included in mean difference for the effects of LVRT and HVRT on total
this review used exercises with elastic bands and rating of body adiposity against the standard error, and after the funnel
perceived exertion (RPE) intensity, which makes the use of plot inspection, no asymmetry was demonstrated, suggesting
the %1RMRM relationship difficult. Moreover, the RT no publication bias (Supplementary Fig. 1).TaggedAPTARAEnd
intensity zone was similar across the included studies,
ranging from moderate to high intensity.TaggedAPTARAEnd
TaggedAPTARAH23.2. Characteristics of the participantsTaggedAPTARAEnd
TaggedAPTARAPThe characteristics of the study participants included in the
TaggedAPTARAH13. ResultsTaggedAPTARAEnd
systematic review with meta-analysis are presented in Table 1. A
TaggedAPTARAH23.1. Selection and quality assessment of the studiesTaggedAPTARAEnd
total of 742 sedentary females (mean age = 66 years) who were
TaggedAPTARAPThe initial selection processes retrieved 1015 full texts, as overweight/obese and apparently healthy were included in the
documented in the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1). After analysis. The mean values for blood markers were »220 mg/dL