Page 29 - 《运动与健康科学》(英文)2024年第2期
P. 29

TaggedAPTARAEndResistance training volume effects on menopause                                        151
           Table 2 (Continued)
                                                                                                                   a
           Study (country)TaggedAPTARAEnd  ExerciseTaggedAPTARAEnd    RT prescriptionTaggedAPTARAEnd   RT volume group TaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARATbody
                        48
           Phillips et al. (2012), USATaggedAPTARAEnd  10 exercises: chest press, lat pull-down, seated  812 RM, 812 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise,  HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                     rows, shoulder press, leg abduction, leg adduc-  1.5 min recovery between sets and 2 min recovery
                                     tion, chest flys, leg press, leg curl, and leg  between exercises, 3 times/week for 12 weeks;
                                     extensionTaggedAPTARAEnd         Adherence was 100%TaggedAPTARAEnd
                        74
           Ribeiro et al. (2020), BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd  8 exercises: chest press, seated row, triceps push-  812 RM, 812 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise,  LVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                     down, preacher curl, horizontal leg press, knee  12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
                                                                      recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 8
                                     extension, knee curl, and seated calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                      weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
                         75
           Tomeleri et al. (2016), BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd  8 exercises: chest press, horizontal leg press,  1015 RM, 1015 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise,  HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                     seated row, knee extension, preacher curl (free  12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
                                     weights), leg curl, triceps pushdown, and seated  recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 8
                                     calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd        weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
                          76
           Tomeleri et al. (2018)a; BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd  8 exercises: chest press, seated row, triceps push-  1015 RM, 1015 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise,  HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                     down, preacher curl, horizontal leg press, knee  12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
                                     extension, knee curl, and seated calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd  recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 12
                                                                      weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
                          77
           Tomeleri et al. (2018)b; BrazilTaggedAPTARAEnd  8 exercises: chest press, seated row, triceps push-  1015 RM, 1015 reps/exercise, 3 sets/exercise,  HVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                     down, preacher curl, horizontal leg press, knee  12 min recovery between sets and 23 min
                                     extension, knee curl, and seated calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd  recovery between exercises, 3 times/week for 12
                                                                      weeks; Adherence 85%TaggedAPTARAEnd
                      78
           Urzi et al. (2019), SloveniaTaggedAPTARAEnd  8 exercises: chair squats; band seated: biceps curl, 1214 (BORG), 9 (512) reps/exercise, 2 (13)  LVRTTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                     seated row, knee extension, leg press, and hip  sets/exercise, 12 min recovery between sets,
                                     abduction; and standing behind the chair: knee  3 times/week for 12 weeks; Adherence was
                                     flexion and calf raiseTaggedAPTARAEnd  »88%TaggedAPTARAEnd
           a
             Total volume = number of exercises £ number of sets per exercise £ number of reps per exercise £ number of exercise sessions per week £ weeks of interven-
           tion (LVRT and HVRT were separated by the median value, 6480 arbitrary units).
           Abbreviations: BORG = Borg rate of perceived exertion scale; CR-10 = adapted Borg scale; DUP = daily undulating periodization; HVRT = high-volume resis-
           tance training; LVRT = low-volume resistance training; NP = non-periodized; OMNI-RES = Omni resistance scale; reps = repetitions; RM = repetition maximum;
           RPE = rating of perceived exertion; RT-DUP = resistance training performed with daily undulating periodization; RT-EB = resistance training performed with
           traditional elastic bands; RT-ET = resistance training performed with elastic tubes with handles; RT-F2 = resistance training performed 2 times per week; RT-
           F3 = resistance training performed 3 times per week; RT-NP = non-periodized resistance training; RT-NPR = resistance training performed with narrow-pyramid
           system; RT-WPR = resistance training performed with wide-pyramid system.

           week or 812 repetitions per set, we used the mean value (e.g.,  excluding duplicate records and papers based on title and
           2.5 and 10, respectively) to calculate the total volume. The  abstract, 50 studies were assessed according to the PICOS
           LVRT and HVRT were divided according to median total  eligibility criteria. Subsequently, 30 studies were excluded for
                                                                 not meeting the inclusion criteria. Therefore, 20 RCTs (RT
           volume (6480 arbitrary units).TaggedAPTARAEnd
             TaggedAPTARAPThe RT intensity was not included in the total training  groups (n = 26) and CG (n = 20)) 52,6178  were included in the
           volume calculation for the following reasons: 60  (a) although  qualitative and quantitative synthesis: 19 investigations with
           the %1RMRM relationship may be used in field practice,  body adiposity data,  52,6164,6678  9 studies with serum inflam-
                                                                            48,52,65,66,68,7578
           research to date does not support the widespread use of these  matory data,    and 9 with serum metabolic
                                                                    52,6466,68,70,75,77,78
           tables for establishing training loads for every exercise (e.g.,  data   (Table 1). Only 1 study did not provide
                                                                                48
           equipment: machine and free weights; muscle groups: single  inflammatory data. Moreover, all studies included in both the
           joints and multiple joints); (b) the most accurate relationship  qualitative and quantitative synthesis presented an overall risk
           between the %1RMRM is for loads greater than 75% of the  of bias for all outcomes characterized by some concerns,
           1RM and fewer than 10 repetitions, which was not a    except 1 study which presented an overall high risk of bias
           common exercise intensity in the majority of the studies  (Fig. 2). A funnel plot was constructed using the standardized
           included in this review; and (c) some studies included in  mean difference for the effects of LVRT and HVRT on total
           this review used exercises with elastic bands and rating of  body adiposity against the standard error, and after the funnel
           perceived exertion (RPE) intensity, which makes the use of  plot inspection, no asymmetry was demonstrated, suggesting
           the %1RMRM relationship difficult. Moreover, the RT   no publication bias (Supplementary Fig. 1).TaggedAPTARAEnd
           intensity zone was similar across the included studies,
           ranging from moderate to high intensity.TaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                 TaggedAPTARAH23.2. Characteristics of the participantsTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                   TaggedAPTARAPThe characteristics of the study participants included in the
           TaggedAPTARAH13. ResultsTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                 systematic review with meta-analysis are presented in Table 1. A
           TaggedAPTARAH23.1. Selection and quality assessment of the studiesTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                 total of 742 sedentary females (mean age = 66 years) who were
             TaggedAPTARAPThe initial selection processes retrieved 1015 full texts, as  overweight/obese and apparently healthy were included in the
           documented in the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1). After  analysis. The mean values for blood markers were »220 mg/dL
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34