Page 61 - 《中国药科大学学报》2026年第2期
P. 61

第  57 卷第  2 期                  冉靖芝,等:毒品原植物       DNA  鉴定方法研究进展                             187


               表 2    毒品原植物  DNA  鉴定方法优缺点
                      类  别            名  称                   优  点                           缺  点
                   DNA分子标记          RFLP            共显性,结果稳定,信息完整                  操作烦琐,耗时长,通量低
                                    CAPS            操作简便,准确性高,自动化                  依赖已知酶切位点
                                    RAPD            操作简便,通用性强                      重复性差,显性标记,信息有限
                                    SCAR            特异性强,重复性好                      开发过程复杂
                                    STR             共显性,鉴别力强,灵敏度高                  需已知侧翼序列,开发成本高
                                    SNP             数量丰富,稳定性高,易于分型                 单位点信息量低,需组合分析
                   DNA条形码           ITS             种间变异大,通用性强,鉴别能力强               可能存在多拷贝问题
                                    rbcL            易于扩增,序列获取成功率高                  种间鉴别能力有时不足
                                    trnH-psbA       进化快,对近缘种鉴别力强                   Indel多,序列比对困难
                                    复合条形码           显著提高鉴别能力和可靠性                   成本与工作量增加
                   新兴技术             HRM             快速,低成本,可检测单碱基差异                需优化反应条件,依赖高质量PCR
                                    WGS             信息量大,完整度高                      成本高,数据分析复杂
                                    TGS             无需PCR,便携                       原始错误率较高
                                    GWAS            信息量大,识别未知关联位点                  需大量样本和表型数据
                                    DETECTR         高特异性与灵敏度,快速                    处于研发初期,仍需研究

               [3]   Cho JY, Ryu DH, Hamayun M, et al. Scent knows better: utiliz-  SNP markers and a novel SNP genotyping assay for distinguish-
                    ing volatile organic compounds as a robust tool for identifying  ing opium poppies[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2022, 339: 111416.
                    higher   cannabidiol-   and   tetrahydrocannabinol-containing  [13]   Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, et al. Biological identifica-
                    Cannabis cultivars in field conditions[J]. J Agric Food Chem,  tions  through  DNA  barcodes[J].  Proc  Biol  Sci,  2003,
                    2024, 72(44): 24711-24723.                       270(1512): 313-321.
               [4]   Grodzicker T, Williams J, Sharp P, et al. Physical mapping of  [14]   Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, et al. Use of DNA bar-
                    temperature-sensitive mutations of adenoviruses[J]. Cold Spring  codes to identify flowering plants[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
                    Harb Symp Quant Biol, 1975, 39 Pt 1: 439-446.    2005, 102(23): 8369-8374.
               [5]   Cirovic N, Kecmanovic M, Keckarevic D, et al. Differentiation  [15]   Roman  MG,  Gutierrez  R,  Houston  R.  Massively parallel   se-
                    of Cannabis subspecies by THCA synthase gene analysis using  quencing  of  Cannabis  sativa  chloroplast  hotspots  for  forensic
                    RFLP[J]. J Forensic Leg Med, 2017, 51: 81-84.    typing[J]. J Cannabis Res, 2022, 4(1): 13.
               [6]   Williams  JG,  Kubelik  AR,  Livak  KJ,  et  al.  DNA  polymor-  [16]   An HE, Mun MH, Malik A, et al. Development of a two-layer
                    phisms  amplified  by  arbitrary  primers  are  useful  as  genetic  machine learning model for the forensic application of legal and
                    markers[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 1990, 18(22): 6531-6535.  illegal poppy classification based on sequence data[J]. Forensic
               [7]   Tittarelli R, Gismondi A, Di Marco G, et al. Forensic applica-  Sci Int Genet, 2024, 71: 103061.
                    tion of genetic and toxicological analyses for the identification  [17]   Graham  K,  Cantu  C,  Houston  R.  Sequence variation  of   com-
                    and characterization of the opium poppy (Papaver somniferum  mercially available kratom products at universal DNA barcode
                    L. )[J]. Biology (Basel), 2022, 11(5): 672.      regions[J]. J Forensic Sci, 2024, 69(4): 1421-1428.
               [8]   Zhao  YH,  Zhao  HT,  Hou  WH,  et  al.  Sequence  characterized  [18]   Shen YK, Liu CY, Zhou D, et al. Study on the application of
                    amplified region. Developments of SRAP and SCAR molecular  DNA  barcode  in  the  identification  of  new  drug  original  plant
                    markers  associated  with  sex  in  Bama  Hemp[J/OL].  Mol  Plant  Chattergrass species[J]. For Public Secur (森林公安), 2017(3):
                    Breed(分子植物育种), 2021, 46(5): 464-470.             29-31.
               [9]   Xia RC, Tao RY, Qu YL, et al. Development and validation of  [19]   Liu  WQ,  Liang  L,  Li  L,  et  al.  Identification  of  Papaveraceae
                    a  novel  and  fast  detection  method  for  Cannabis  sativa:  a  19-  seeds by DNA barcoding based on ITS sequence[J]. China Port
                    plex  short  tandem  repeat  typing  system[J].  Front  Plant  Sci,  Sci Technol (中国口岸科学技术), 2022, 4(2): 61-65.
                    2022, 13: 837945.                           [20]   Chen MY, Tu YC, Shyu HY, et al. Using rDNA ITS2 barcod-
               [10]   Borin M, Palumbo F, Vannozzi A, et al. Developing and test-  ing to identify kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) from the genus Mi-
                    ing molecular markers in Cannabis sativa (hemp) for their use  tragyna and Neolamarckia cadamba[J]. Electrophoresis, 2025,
                    in  variety  and  dioecy  assessments[J].  Plants  (Basel),  2021,  46(3/4): 192-197.
                    10(10): 2174.                               [21]   Cheng L, Lin ZQ, Xin CR, et al. Molecular identification and
               [11]   Zhang YJ, Wang J, Yang LL, et al. Development of SSR and  phylogenetic analysis of Papaver based on ITS2 barcoding[J]. J
                    SNP  markers  for  identifying  opium  poppy[J].  Int  J  Leg  Med,  Forensic Sci, 2022, 67(2): 712-719.
                    2022, 136(5): 1261-1271.                    [22]   Corvalán  LCJ,  de  Melo-Ximenes  AA,  Carvalho  LR,  et  al.  Is
               [12]   Chang  M,  Kim  JY,  Lee  H,  et  al.  Development  of  diagnostic  there a key primer for amplification of core land plant DNA bar-
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66