Page 96 - 《中国药科大学学报》2025年第4期
P. 96

492                      学报   Journal of China Pharmaceutical University 2025, 56(4): 488 − 497  第 56 卷
                A  1.5         pH 4.8          B   1.1         pH 7.0          C  0.8         pH 7.5

                          0;
                          P-8;
                          P-25;                                                                          &&&  ***
                                                                                                         ###
                          A-13.5;                                           ***                          &&&
                                                                                                         ###
                   1.0    A-42.187 5;                                     &&&
                          B-5.18;
                                                                          ###
                  A 600 nm  B-16.187 5;   ###  ***  A 600 nm  0.5         & ###  A 600 nm  0.4
                                                                          ###
                          S-26.68;
                                                                          &&&
                          S-83.375
                                          ###
                   0.5                    &&&
                                          &&&
                                          ###
                                          &&&
                    0                               0                               0
                      0    2   4    6    8           0    2    4    6    8           0    2    4    6    8
                                p/h                             p/h                            p/h
                            D  1.5         8 mmol/L    **         E  1.5         25 mmol/L
                              mRNA expression  1.0  **  **          mRNA expression  1.0
                                                                     0.5
                               0.5
                                       *** ***
                                             ***
                                                                             *** *** *** ***
                                 0                                     0
                                   Cont  NleA  NleB  NleH  EspI  EspZ  Tir  Cont  NleA  NleB  NleH  EspI  EspZ  Tir
               Figure 1    Sodium propionate significantly inhibited the growth of Citrobacter rodentium (C.r.) compared with mixed SCFAs ( x±SE, n=3-4)
               A-C: Under different pH conditions, different components of SCFAs were co-cultured with C.r. in vitro, and the changes of C.r. growth
                                                                          &
                           ***
               were  monitored.  P<0.001  vs  0  mmol/L  group;   ### P<0.001  vs  P-8  mmol/L  group;  P<0.05,   &&& P<0.001  vs  P-25  mmol/L  group;  D-E:
               Different  concentrations  of  sodium  propionate  were  co-cultured  with  C.r.  to  detect  the  expression  of  colonization  virulence  factors.
               **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs Cont group
                     A   110                                     B   10 11

                                                                             C.r.;
                                                                             C.r.+Pro;
                                                                     10 10 9  C.r.+SCFAs     ***
                       Body weight change/%  100  @@  * @@@  ** @@  @@  @@@  Bacterial output/g feces  10 8 7  *** *  ***  **  *** *
                                                    &&
                                                         &
                                                &
                                                         #
                                                    #
                                                #
                                                                     10
                                                                                                ##
                                                                                            #
                                                    ***
                                                        ***
                                                                     10
                                 Cont;
                         90
                                         C.r.+Pro;
                                 Pro;
                                         C.r.+SCFAs
                                 SCFAs;  C.r.;                       10 6
                                                                     10 5
                            0 1   3    5   7    9   11  13               0 1   3    5   7   9   11  13
                                    Day post C.r. infection                      Day post C.r. infection
               Figure 2    Sodium propionate significantly reduces the degree of weight loss and intestinal bacterial output in infected mice compared
               with mixed SCFAs ( x±SE, n=5-6)
               A:  Sodium  Propionate  and  SCFAs  were  intervention  in  C.r.  infected  mice,  and  the  weight  changes  were  monitored  during  modeling,
               * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 C.r. vs Cont;   P<0.05 C.r.+Pro vs Pro;   @@  P<0.01,   @@@  P<0.001 C.r.+SCFAs vs SCFAs;   P<0.05,
                                                                                                       &
                                                 #
               &&  P<0.01 C.r.+Pro vs C.r.; B: Detection of intestinal bacterial output of mice in each infection group, * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs
                   #
                         ##
               C.r.;   P<0.05,   P<0.01 C.r.+Pro vs C.r.+SCFAs
               22)可促进     Reg3γ 生成,IL-22 还与肠道白介素-               肠上皮机械屏障功能的改变。结果表明,C.r.诱导
               17(IL-17)共同促进肠上皮细胞抵御感染。研究                        肠通透性增加,而丙酸钠和混合              SCFAs 可降低这种
               发现,C.r.+Pro 组   IL-17、IL-22 和  Reg3γ 水平高于        损伤。且相比较混合          SCFAs,丙酸钠减少损伤的效
               C.r.组 ( 图   4-A−4-C) , 且   C.r.+Pro 组  IL-17 和   果更好(图     4-D)。

               Reg3γ 水平高于     C.r.+SCFAs 组。除了黏液屏障,肠             3.5    丙酸钠较  SCFAs 明显影响      CD4 Th 细胞分化
                                                                                                 +
               上皮细胞紧密连接形成的机械屏障也发挥重要的                                 在感染的过程中,肠道主要发挥适应性免疫反
               抗感染作用。因此,灌胃小鼠              FITC-葡聚糖检测了           应以抵抗感染。CD4 T       +  细胞是肠道适应性免疫应
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101