Page 108 - 卫星导航2021年第1-2合期
P. 108

Shinghal and Bisnath  Satell Navig            (2021) 2:10                               Page 11 of 17























              Fig. 12  Change in carrier-phase measurements compared to Doppler measurements for a kinematic dataset in a medium multipath environment,
              DOY 325, 2019




            measurements are not continuous, with more frequent       n�XY − �X�Y
            and larger gaps than for the carrier-phase data gaps.   m =  n�X − (�X) 2                     (2)
                                                                           2
            Te occurrence of long durations of missing Doppler
            measurements can be attributed to poor carrier-phase
            tracking in challenging environments and due to the   c =  Y − mX                           (3)
            low-cost antenna.                                             n
              Diferent extrapolations methods were tested and a sum-  where n is the number of past measurements considered.
            mary is presented in Fig. 13 using the example of satellite   Te extrapolated measurements are taken into considera-
            G26 L5 carrier-phase measurements.                tion if the gap is greater than one epoch. X is the index to
              Artifcial gaps ranging from 4 and 5 s were synthesized.   count the number of epochs; Y is the value of the observ-
            ‘n’ corresponds to the number of past measurements used   able being predicted. Te next measurement at X can be
            to predict the next measurement in case of a gap for a lin-  predicted as:
            ear extrapolator. Te linear model is a simple mathematical
            technique that computes the slope based on the past meas-  c + m × x                          (4)
            urement and uses it to predict the next measurement. If the   As seen in Fig.  13, the carrier-phase measurements
            epochs are taken as X and the carrier-phase / pseudorange   already have a data gap present at epoch 17. Te linear
            measurements are taken as Y, then                 extrapolator with the past 2 measurements produces an
                                                              RMS prediction error of 16 cm over the 4 epochs (epochs
                                                              21–24, inclusive), while the prediction error using 3 and
























              Fig. 13  Predicted L5 measurements and prediction error using diferent extrapolation technique
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113