Page 64 - 《运动与健康科学》(英文)2024年第2期
P. 64

TaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAFigure    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

                  TaggedAPTARAEnd                                                                        TaggedAPTARAFigure  TaggedAPTARAEnd

                                           Journal of Sport and Health Science 13 (2024) 186194

                                                          Review

              TaggedAPTARAH1Chronic effects of stretching on range of motion with consideration of

             potential moderating variables: A systematic review with meta-analysisTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                               c
                                                    b
                                                                                                            b
             TaggedAPTARAPAndreas Konrad  a,b , Shahab Alizadeh , Abdolhamid Daneshjoo , Saman Hadjizadeh Anvar ,
                                                                                                      a
                                                                   b
                                                                                     b
                                                  b
                                     b
                   Andrew Graham , Ali Zahiri , Reza Goudini , Chris Edwards , Carina Scharf ,
                                                                       b,
                                                 David George Behm *TaggedAPTARAEnd
                              a
                              TaggedAPTARAP Institute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, Graz University, Graz A-8010, Austria
                        b
                         School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
             c
              Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 76169-13439, Iran
         TaggedAPTARAEnd             Received 4 November 2022; revised 31 March 2023; accepted 10 May 2023
                                                    Available online 8 June 2023
            2095-2546/Ó 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
                                             (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
         TaggedAPTARAPAbstract
         Background: It is well known that stretch training can induce prolonged increases in joint range of motion (ROM). However, to date more infor-
         mation is needed regarding which training variables might have greater influence on improvements in flexibility. Thus, the purpose of this meta-
         analysis was to investigate the effects of stretch training on ROM in healthy participants by considering potential moderating variables, such as
         stretching technique, intensity, duration, frequency, and muscles stretched, as well as sex-specific, age-specific, and/or trained state-specific
         adaptations to stretch training.
         Methods: We searched through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SportDiscus to find eligible studies and, finally, assessed the
         results from 77 studies and 186 effect sizes by applying a random-effect meta-analysis. Moreover, by applying a mixed-effect model,
         we performed the respective subgroup analyses. To find potential relationships between stretch duration or age and effect sizes, we
         performed a meta-regression.
         Results: We found a significant overall effect, indicating that stretch training can increase ROM with a moderate effect compared to the controls
                                                                             2
         (effect size = 1.002; Z = 12.074; 95% confidence interval: 1.165 to 0.840; p < 0.001; I = 74.97). Subgroup analysis showed a significant
         difference between the stretching techniques (p = 0.01) indicating that proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and static stretching produced
         greater ROM than did ballistic/dynamic stretching. Moreover, there was a significant effect between the sexes (p = 0.04), indicating that females
         showed higher gains in ROM compared to males. However, further moderating analysis showed no significant relation or difference.
         Conclusion: When the goal is to maximize ROM in the long term, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation or static stretching, rather than
         ballistic/dynamic stretching, should be applied. Something to consider in future research as well as sports practice is that neither volume, inten-
         sity, nor frequency of stretching were found to play a significant role in ROM yields.

         TaggedAPTARAPKeywords: Flexibility; Long-term stretching; Stretch trainingTaggedAPTARAEnd



                                                               the maximum ROM at a specific stretch intensity (e.g., until
         TaggedAPTARAH11. IntroductionTaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                               the point of discomfort). 17  However, in response to research
            TaggedAPTARAPThe most common stretching techniques are static, ballistic,
                                                               over the last 25 years reporting performance decrements
         dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF)  following prolonged static stretching, there has been a shift
         stretching. 17  All of these methods are able to increase joint
                                                               toward emphasizing dynamic and ballistic stretching, espe-
         range of motion (ROM) when implemented consistently in a  cially in athletic populations.  3,6,18  Dynamic stretching involves
         training program.  811  Traditionally, the most commonly used
                                 1216                         moving the joint repeatedly at a controlled velocity throughout
         technique is static stretching,  where the joint is held at         11
                                                               the whole ROM.   A ballistic stretch is a form of dynamic
                                                               stretching, but performed at higher velocities where the joint
          TaggedAPTARAEndTaggedAPTARAEnd Peer review under responsibility of Shanghai University of Sport.  10
          TaggedAPTARAEnd* Corresponding author.               may reach the maximum ROM. Additionally, PNF stretching
            E-mail address: dbehm@mun.ca (D.G. Behm).          is a technique frequently used in sports practice as well as in
         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2023.06.002
         Cite this article: Konrad A, Alizadeh S, Daneshjoo A, et al. Chronic effects of stretching on range of motion with consideration of potential moderating variables:
         A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci 2024;13:18694.
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69