Page 34 - 卫星导航2021年第1-2合期
P. 34

Du et al. Satell Navig             (2021) 2:3                       Satellite Navigation
            https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-020-00034-8
                                                                              https://satellite-navigation.springeropen.com/



             REVIEW                                                                           Open Access

            Vulnerabilities and integrity of precise point


            positioning for intelligent transport systems:

            overview and analysis


                    1*
                                    1
                                               1
            Yujun Du   , Jinling Wang , Chris Rizos  and Ahmed El‑Mowafy 2

              Abstract
              The implementation of Intelligent Transport System (ITS) technology is expected to signifcantly improve road safety
              and trafc efciency. One of the key components of ITS is precise vehicle positioning. Positioning with decimetre to
              sub‑metre accuracy is a fundamental capability for self‑driving, and other automated applications. Global Navigation
              Satellite System (GNSS) Precise Point Positioning (PPP) is an attractive positioning approach for ITS due to its relatively
              low‑cost and fexibility. However, GNSS PPP is vulnerable to several efects, especially those caused by the challeng‑
              ing urban environments, where the ITS technology is most likely needed. To meet the high integrity requirements of
              ITS applications, it is necessary to carefully analyse potential faults and failures of PPP and to study relevant integrity
              monitoring methods. In this paper an overview of vulnerabilities of GNSS PPP is presented to identify the faults that
              need to be monitored when developing PPP integrity monitoring methods. These vulnerabilities are categorised into
              diferent groups according to their impact and error sources to assist integrity fault analysis, which is demonstrated
              with Failure Modes and Efects Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) methods. The main vulnerabilities are dis‑
              cussed in detail, along with their causes, characteristics, impact on users, and related mitigation methods. In addition,
              research on integrity monitoring methods used for accounting for the threats and faults in PPP for ITS applications is
              briefy reviewed. Both system‑level (network‑end) and user‑level (user‑end) integrity monitoring approaches for PPP
              are briefy discussed, focusing on their development and the challenges in urban scenarios. Some open issues, on
              which further eforts should focus, are also identifed.
              Keywords:  Intelligent transport system, GNSS precise point positioning, Vulnerability, Fault analysis, Integrity
              monitoring


            Introduction                                      Positioning Service (SPS) using L1 coarse/acquisition
            Intelligent Transport System (ITS) technology relies on   (C/A) code observations results in a horizontal position
            one or more Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS)   error of the order of 5–10 m (at 95% probability), which
            for absolute positioning (Dovis et al. 2020; Firmin 2006;   is insufciently accurate for critical ITS applications (U.S.
            Imparato et  al.  2018b). What is required is a low-cost   Department of Defense 2020). Te possible GNSS posi-
            positioning technique for decimetre to sub-metre accu-  tioning techniques that can be used in ITS include Real-
            racy, with real-time capability to enable automated   Time Kinematic (RTK) and Network RTK (NRTK), use
            vehicle navigation (Green et  al.  2013; Stephenson et  al.   of a Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS), and
            2011). Te GPS (Global Positioning System) Standard   Precise Point Positioning (PPP) (Green et al. 2013; Lovas
                                                              et al. 2011).
                                                                RTK and NRTK are both diferential positioning tech-
            *Correspondence:  yujundu@sdu.edu.cn
            1  School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South   niques which require one or more nearby continuously
            Wales, Sydney, Australia                          operating GNSS reference station. In contrast, PPP is
            Full list of author information is available at the end of the article  an absolute positioning technique that can be applied


                                     © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
                                     adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
                                     the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material
                                     in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material
                                     is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the
                                     permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco
                                     mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39