Page 116 - 卫星导航2021年第1-2合期
P. 116

Xia et al. Satell Navig             (2021) 2:8                                           Page 2 of 19





            of multi-system and multi-frequency smartphone GNSS   that of BDS-2, GPS, and Galileo satellites (Zhang et  al.
            chipsets makes it possible for mobile users to obtain pre-  2019b). Besides,  Beidou-3 shows superiority in system
            cise positioning results. At present, the horizontal accu-  coverage, spatial signal accuracy, availability, and conti-
            racy of smartphone GNSS positioning is generally in the   nuity (Guo et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2019, 2020). Te rapid
            range of meter to sub-meter, including in urban environ-  development of BDS enables global users to obtain accu-
            ments (Liu et al. 2019; Fortunato et al. 2019; Chen et al.   rate real-time location information with geodetic receivers
            2019). Some researchers claimed to achieve decimeter-  or low-cost GNSS devices.
            level accuracy of PPP or RTK positioning (Gill et al. 2017;   Nowadays, many domestic mainstream Android smart-
            Zhang et  al.  2019a). Banville et  al. (2019) verifed that   phones in China support BDS. Several overseas products
            static PPP positioning accuracy at centimeter level was   such as Samsung and Google Pixel series can also receive
            achievable  in  a  good  observation  condition  and  by  vir-  BDS satellite signals. However, much attention has been
            tue of the precise ionospheric corrections derived from a   paid to GPS-led mobile positioning, but little to BDS. Liu
            regional network of stations. Wanninger and Heßelbarth   et  al. (2019) and Chen et  al. (2019) incorporated smart-
            (2020) calibrated the antenna phase center for a Hua-  phone BDS observations in multi-system SPP and real-
            wei P30 mobile phone and obtained short baseline RTK   time PPP experiments, respectively. Wang et  al. (2016),
            accuracy at centimeter level after fxing ambiguities using   and Odolinski and Teunissen (2019) studied smartphone
            GPS L1 carrier phase measurements. Although the low   RTK positioning performance under diferent scenarios
            gain and poor multipath mitigation of the GNSS anten-  using multi-system observations including BDS. But very
            nas in smartphones limit the positioning accuracy, con-  few research are on BDS-only positioning for LBS applica-
            tinuous hardware and software advancements make the   tions, especially outside the Asia–Pacifc region. In addi-
            positioning performance with smartphones getting closer   tion, constrained by the previous system construction and
            to that of professional receivers.                the observation conditions for BDS-3, the results of some
              Another crucial factor that impacts the rapid develop-  researches are inconclusive and even contradictory. BDS-3
            ment of smartphone high-precision positioning is the   global service needs to be investigated thoroughly from the
            modernization of GNSS, especially the emergence of new   perspective of positioning (Shi et al. 2020). From the above
            systems and new signals. Te most notable system is Chi-  and with the completion of BDS, it is necessary to evalu-
            nese BeiDou navigation satellite System (BDS). On June 23,   ate its capability in the smartphone positioning, including
            2020, the last satellite of the third generation BeiDou navi-  BDS alone and its integration with other GNSS constella-
            gation satellite System (BDS-3) was successfully launched,   tions, so as to provide a reference for the further improve-
            marking the complete deployment of BDS global constella-  ments in BDS global PNT services. Additionally, the 5G
            tion. Te completion of the BDS constellation extends the   communication and positioning technology is booming,
            Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) services from   and smartphones are  the ideal  platforms  of mobile  net-
            the Asia–Pacifc region to the rest of the world. BDS-3 is   works. Te research on BDS mobile location services also
            currently composed of 30 satellites, including 3 GEosta-  has a certain signifcance for promoting the integration of
            tionary  Orbit  (GEO)  satellites,  24 Medium  Earth  Orbit   5G and BDS on smartphones (Liu et al. 2020).
            (MEO) satellites and 3 Inclined Geosynchronous Orbit   Tis article is the frst to conduct a systematic evalu-
            (IGSO) satellites. Te new system retains the B1I and B3I   ation of the smartphone BDS positioning performance
            signals of BeiDou navigation satellite (regional) System   outside the Asia–Pacifc region, in Nottingham of the
            (BDS-2) and replaces B2I with B2b on the same frequency.   UK, since it’s fully operational. Much attention is paid to
            Meanwhile, BDS-3 introduces two new signals, B1C/B2a,   how BDS performs in harsh environments. Te structure
            which are compatible with GPS L1/L5 and Galileo E1/E5a   of the article is as follows. Firstly, the satellite visibility
            (Lu et al. 2019). Since the frst two BDS-3 satellites were   and Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP) distribu-
            launched on November 5, 2017, researchers have con-  tion of BDS constellation are analyzed, especially in the
            ducted a lot of research on the new generation of naviga-  UK area. Secondly, we introduce the experimental design
            tion satellite system, including satellite visibility (Wang   and data collection process. Tirdly, the quality of the
            et al. 2019b), orbit determination (Wang et al. 2019a; Xie   smartphone BDS observations is assessed, including the
            et al. 2019), error correction (Gu et al. 2020; Wang et al.   carrier-to-noise density ratio and pseudorange measure-
            2020; Zhang et al. 2020), observation quality and position-  ment noise. Fourthly, we analyze the performances of
            ing performance (Xie et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019b; Lv   smartphone BDS single point positioning in a static and
            et al. 2020; Shi et al. 2020). Compared with BDS-2, BDS-3   open environment and a kinematic complex environ-
            has some signifcant improvements in clock stability, orbit   ment. Te above experimental results are compared with
            accuracy, signal strength and pseudorange observation   those of other GNSS. Finally, we summarize our research
            quality. Te phase noise level of BDS-3 is comparable to   fndings.
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121