Page 237 - 《水产学报》2025年第8期
P. 237

何妤如                                                                   水产学报, 2025, 49(8): 089319

              overseas  territories  generally  engage  in  regional  Policy  (CFP)  to  the  European  Commission,  which
              fisheries  management  through  their  metropolitan  collectively manages  fisheries  activities  by   Mem-
              States,  often  relying  on  indirect  representation  for  ber  States  both  within  EU  waters  and  on  the  high
              expressing  positions,  submitting  proposals  and  seas areas. In this context, the EU generally engages
              implementing  CMMs.  Considering  the  specific  in intergovernmental  organizations  related  to   mar-
              developmental needs of certain overseas territories,  ine  fisheries  primarily  as  a  Regional  Economic
              RFMOs  have  implemented  scaled  participation  Integration Organization (REIO). Currently, the EU
              mechanisms that afford limited engagement in fish-  holds membership in five tuna-RFMOs, eleven non-
              eries  rule-making  processes.  These  include  partial  tuna  RFMOs  and  two  RFMO-like  bodies,  namely,
              involvement in developing CMMs, opportunities for  the  Fisheries  Committee  for  the  Eastern  Central
              diplomatic  representation  at  meetings  to  express  Atlantic (CECAF) and the Western Central Atlantic
              positions, and provisions of tailored support. Throu-  Fisheries Commission  (WECAFC).  However,   cer-
              gh these mechanisms, overseas territories and pos-  tain territories of EU Member States lie outside the
              sessions  have  been  granted  a  degree  of  agency  to  formal CFP jurisdiction, as they are not part of the
              garner international  attention  and  assistance,   des-  EU and thus are not fully governed by EU fisheries
              pite  their  constrained  legal  standing.  Within  the  regulations.  In  such  cases,  the  relevant  Member
                                                               States may  seek  independent  membership  in   spe-
              WCPFC, seven overseas territories and possessions
              participate  in  this  modified  capacity:  American  cific RFMOs. A notable example involves Denmark’
                                                               s  self-governing  territories —Greenland  and  the
              Samoa,  Guam,  and  the  Northern  Mariana  Islands
              (the United States); French Polynesia, New Caledo-  Faroe Islands, which possess distinct marine eco-
                                                               systems.  Their  economies  are  heavily  dependent
              nia,  and  Wallis  and  Futuna  (France);  and  Tokelau
                                                               on fisheries,  necessitating  international   coopera-
              (New Zealand). Article 30 of the WCPFC Conven-
                                                                                           [34]
                                                               tion  for  resource  management .  Denmark  has
              tion  explicitly  acknowledges  these  territories  and
                                                               therefore scaled up the expression scope of its territ-
              possessions’  vulnerabilities  and  special  requireme-
                                                               orial  jurisdictions,  allowing  Greenland  and  the
              nts regarding the conservation and management of
                                                               Faroe Islands to join the Northeast Atlantic Fisher-
              highly migratory fish stocks and the development of
                                                               ies  Commission  (NEAFC)  and  the  Northwest
              associated fisheries.  It  further  mandates  the   estab-
                                                               Atlantic Fisheries  Organization  (NAFO)  as   con-
              lishment of a special development fund to provide
                                                               tracting parties  in  their  own  rights.  It  also   repres-
              discretionary technical, human, and financial assist-
                                                               ents the  Faroe  Islands  to  obtain  special   participat-
              ance, thereby situating these territories and posses-
                                                               ory  status  (without  voting  rights)  in  the  SPRFMO
              sions within the same discursive framework. Simil-
                                                               and  the  WCPFC.  Meanwhile,  mainland  Denmark
              arly,  the  SPRFMO  grants  distinct  participatory
                                                               participates in these RFMOs through EU member-
              status to overseas territories and possessions. Com-
                                                               ship. In terms of policy orientation, the EU is often
              pared to fishing entities, however, overseas territor-
                                                               characterized as a “pragmatic environmental advoc-
              ies and possessions mainly operate with more lim-
                                                               ate”,  advancing  its  high  environmental  standards
              ited  autonomy,  as  their  involvement  is  closely
                                                               through policy proposals on vulnerable species pro-
              aligned with the diplomatic and policy preferences
                                                               tection  and  marine  protected  area  management,
              of their metropolitan States.

                                                               thereby extending its marine governance influence.

                   The European Union  To ensure fair com-
              petition  for  sustainable  fisheries,  the  European  3.2    Scale representation in decision-making
              Union  (EU)  Member  States  have  delegated  their  The idea of “sustainable development” in fish-
              exclusive  competence  for  marine  biological   eries  governance  attempts  to  reconcile  economic
              resource conservation under the Common Fisheries  growth with  environmental  protection  while   pre-

              中国水产学会主办  sponsored by China Society of Fisheries                          https://www.china-fishery.cn
                                                            11
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242