Page 241 - 《水产学报》2025年第8期
P. 241

何妤如                                                                   水产学报, 2025, 49(8): 089319

              eer the fight against IUU fishing, and create a series  departure. These  geopolitical  developments   ulti-
              of  functionally  differentiated  spatial  units.  The  mately led to the NEAFC’s more complex institu-
              CCAMLR’s spatial  governance  framework   com-   tional landscape wherein multiple types of actors—
              prises multiple  nested  geographical  and   manage-  sovereign  States  and  regional  organizations —
              ment  scales.  Its  management  areas  include  Small-  coexist and participate concurrently.

              Scale Research Units (SSRUs) for exploratory fish-   Rescaling  Dynamic resource allocation.
              eries and Small-Scale Management Units (SSMUs)   The Northeast  Atlantic  mackerel  dispute   exempli-
              for  Antarctic  krill  fishery.  The  Commission  also  fies  the  challenge  of  how  climate  change-induced
              implements graduated  quota  allocation  across   pre-  spatial redistribution  of  marine  resources   destabil-
              cisely delineated zones. The primary Antarctic krill  izes  existing  RFMO  governance  frameworks.
              fishing  grounds,  located  within  FAO  Area  48,  are  Beginning in 2000, rising sea temperatures and con-
              divided  into  six  subareas  (48.1-48.6),  each  subject  sequent  increase  in  biomass  have  driven  mackerel
                                       [39]
              to area-specific catch quotas . These subareas are  stocks northward into Icelandic and Faroese EEZs,
              further subdivided into fifteen SSMUs based on sci-  altering the spatial scales of decision-making within
              entific  assessment  and  management  needs.  FAO  the NEAFC. Iceland framed this ecological shift as
              Areas 58 (eight subareas) and Area 88 (three sub-  a  “sovereign  opportunity”  rather than  an   environ-
              areas) reflect a comparable approach to spatial sub-  mental crisis, as the population of mackerels caught
              division. Moreover, the CCAMLR has developed a   by  Icelandic  fishermen  increased  almost  30-fold
                                                                                   [40]
              comprehensive  MPA  planning  framework,  with   between 2006 and 2010 . Arguing that the prevail-
              nine planning  domains  derived  from  eleven   desig-  ing quota allocation was inequitable, Iceland joined
              nated  priority  areas,  specifically  categorized  into  the  NEAFC  to  gain  institutional  influence  and
              general  protection  zones,  special  research  zones,  clashed with traditional fishing powers such as the
              and  fisheries  research  zones.  This  refined  zoning  EU and Norway over quota reallocation. The dead-
              enables  the  CCAMLR  to  simultaneously  enforce  lock in  reaching  a  consensual  agreement   high-
              strict catch  limits,  promote  IUU  fishing   counter-  lighted  the  fundamental  tension  between  regional
              measures,  and  maintain  ecosystem  resilience  conservation  obligations  and  the  sovereign  fishing
              through scaled management interventions          rights of coastal States.
                   Mosaic membership. Geopolitical transform-      Balanced  conservation  equity.  Recognizing
              ations,  particularly  the  post-Cold  War  realignment  the  imperative  to  counterbalance  historical  power
              and  European  integration,  have  fundamentally  re-  asymmetries, several tuna RFMOs have institution-
              shaped participation scales in the NEAFC. Origin-  alized special provisions to mitigate disproportion-
              ally established under the 1959 Convention with com-  ate  conservation  burdens  on  developing  States.
              prehensive membership encompassing all European  Exemptions  have  been  introduced  by  the  IATTC,
              coastal States  bordering  the  North  Sea  and   North-  ICCAT  and  WCPFC,  with  the  IATTC  granting
              east  Atlantic,  the  organization  witnessed  structural  exemptions to small-scale and artisanal fisheries in
              changes as key members like Denmark and Ireland  developing States harvesting manta rays and north-
              joined the European Community (later the European  ern  albacore  tuna  for  domestic  consumption;  the
              Union), consequently terminating their independent  ICCAT  permitting  developing  coastal  members  to
              NEAFC membership. This integration dynamic cre-  fish  species  such  as  hammerhead,  silky  sharks,
              ated  an  institutional  shift  until  Brexit  prompted  Atlantic blue marlin and white marlin for local con-
              another  scale  reconfiguration,  where  the  United  sumption;  and  the  WCPFC  exempting  less
              Kingdom’s  formally  reapplied  and  has  rejoined  developed  members  from  strict  controls  on  vessel
              NEAFC  as  an  independent  member  after  its  EU  numbers,  catch  volumes,  and  fishing  effort  related

              中国水产学会主办  sponsored by China Society of Fisheries                          https://www.china-fishery.cn
                                                            15
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246