Page 242 - 《水产学报》2025年第8期
P. 242

何妤如                                                                   水产学报, 2025, 49(8): 089319

              to overfished species such as Pacific bluefin tuna.  rangements are anchored in the spatial distribution
                   Small-State  clubbed  governance.  Take  the  of  fish  stocks  and  serve  to  mitigate  mismatches
              management  of  FADs  by  purse  seine  countries  in  between  ecological  and  governance  scales.  Within
              the  WCPO  as  an  example.  CMM2009-02  of  the  this scalar framework, fisheries actors at each level
              WCPFC provides restrictive regulations on the use  strategically employ  scale  as  a  power  lever,   enga-
              of FADs on the high seas, specifying that a single  ging in dynamic negotiations to recalibrate legitim-
              vessel should deploy no more than 350 FADs dur-  acy, authority, and relative influence. Through tac-
              ing  its  operation,  and  auxiliary  vessels  should  not  tics of upscaling, downscaling and rescaling, these
                                                [41]
              assist purse seine vessels in deployment . Tempor-  actors continuously adjust power dynamics to max-
              ally,  one  FADs-closure  period  must  be  chosen  imize their interests within the fisheries sector.
              between  April-May  or  November-December  each      However, artificially constructed management
              year,  with  a  mandatory  closure  from  July  15  to  scales  remain  contentious,  and  spatial  governance
              September  1.  Such  strict  regulations  compress  the  innovations  of  RFMOs  risk  falling  into  the  scalar
              space  for  high  seas  fishing  effort  increase.  trap,  where  mismatches  between  jurisdictional
              However, the PNA members have used the WCPFC     boundaries  and  ecological  or  operational  realities
              rules of procedure to impede the extension of FADs  undermine  effectiveness.  Multi-level  collaboration,
              deployment restrictions to areas under their jurisdic-  while  fostering  inclusivity,  often  entails  efficiency
              tion by issuing exemption certificates to fishing ves-  trade-offs, and the expansion of participatory rights
              sels operating in their EEZs. This prompts high seas  may dilute centralized control, largely contributing
              fleets to transition into their Vessel Day Scheme to  to  a  “tragedy  of  the  anti-commons”  featured  by
              bid for fishing days and FADs, helping these Pacific  fragmented authority and suboptimal resource alloc-
              SIDs to gain more economic benefits.
                                                               ation.
                                                                   With the BBNJ Agreement’s entry into force
              4    CONCLUSION
                                                               potentially  in  2025,  global  ocean  governance  will
                   Scalar  politics  is  characterized  by  struggles  transition into its 3.0 era. The future restructuring of
              over  scale  and  reconfiguration  of  authority,  where  fisheries  relations  and  redistribution  of  fishing
              scales are used not only as an instrumental tool or  rights will extend beyond mere adjustments to exist-
              structural  framework  for  altering  power  relations,  ing scales, addressing regulatory gaps in high-seas
              but also as a target and arena of contestation. In the  areas not yet governed by RFMOs. Navigating com-
              context of fisheries governance, the restructuring of  peting  interests  presents  a  pressing  challenge  for
              power relations  among  relevant  actors  across   spa-  engaging  fisheries  actors  at  different  scales.  Amid
              tial scales has given rise to new governance dynam-  the clustering of international ocean legal mechan-
              ics. Global  instruments  such  as  the  BBNJ   Agree-  isms,  fisheries  narrative  can  be  strategically
              ment  will  provide  normative  guidance  once  in  advanced  at  global,  regional,  subregional  and
              force;  regional  organizations,  particularly  RFMOs,  national scales. By leveraging its proposal rights, a
              are tasked with coordinating resource conservation  State can seek to institutionalize its claims as bind-
              and management efforts; while mosaic participants  ing conservation and management measures within
              facilitate  implementation  through  legislative  and  established governance scales while simultaneously
              policy adaptations.                              shaping new rules and systems to amplify its global
                   As  an  eco-scalar  fix,  RFMOs  institutionalize  influence. In scales where governance frameworks
              their  governance  through  scalar  arrangements,  remain  underdeveloped,  power  dynamics  can  be
              including  jurisdictional  boundaries,  governance  flexibly recalibrated  through  scalar  politics,   steer-
              hierarchies,  and  regulatory  expressions.  These  ar-  ing  international  and  regional  marine  fisheries  co-

              https://www.china-fishery.cn                           中国水产学会主办    sponsored by China Society of Fisheries
                                                            16
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247