Page 15 - 摩擦学学报2025年第4期
P. 15

第 4 期              束坤, 等: 接触几何参数对硬质薄膜断裂和分层失效行为的影响及其解耦分析                                      503

                        3. Zhengzhou Research Institute, Harbin Institute of Technology, Henan Zhengzhou 450046, China)
                 Abstract: Film fracture (cohesive failure) and interfacial delamination (adhesive failure) are two main damage modes of
                 thin  hard  solid  films  on  elastic-plastic  steel  substrates,  and  their  initiation  and  propagation  processes  have  complex
                 coupling relationships. Tensile stress concentrations induced by the bending and stretching effects at film surfaces, and
                 concentrations of tensile and shear stresses caused by the mismatch of elastoplastic deformation at the film/substrate
                 interfaces, are the critical reasons for film fracture and interfacial delamination, respectively. Distribution and evolution
                 behaviors of the film principal stress and the interfacial stress during spherical micro-indentations of thin hard films on
                 elastic-plastic steel substrates were analyzed using the finite element method in this article. Influences of the contact
                 geometric parameter t/R (the ratio of film thickness and spherical indenter radius) on the film fracture and the interfacial
                 delamination  were  investigated,  and  the  guideline  of  the  decoupling  analysis  for  those  two  failure  behaviors  were
                 explored, which provided theoretical guidance for the characterizations of the cohesive and adhesive properties of film-
                 substrate systems. Results indicated that the loading process of a micro-indentation test on a film-substrate system could
                 be roughly divided into three main stages according to the position of the maximum plastic deformation of the substrate:
                 film bearing stage (Stage I), film-substrate common bearing stage (Stage II), and substrate bearing stage (Stage III). The
                 deformation  states  of  the  film  were  elastic  smooth  deformation,  bending  deformation,  and  tensile  deformation,
                 respectively. For the system with a large t/R (t/R ≥ 0.08), the main bearing stage were Stage I and Stage II, and the
                 maximum tensile principal stress of the film was always located in the bottom bending deformation zone; For the system
                 with a small t/R (t/R ≤ 0.01), the main bearing stage was Stage III, and the maximum tensile principal stress of the film
                 was always located in the surface stretching deformation zone at the outer edge of the contact area; For the system with
                 0.02 ≤ t/R ≤ 0.067, the main bearing stage transferred from Stage II to Stage III as the indentation depth increase, and
                 the maximum tensile principal stress of the film shifted from the bottom bending zone to the surface stretching zone at
                 the outer edge of the contact area. The potential fracture form changed from radial cracks to ring cracks, and there was a
                 linear  corresponding  relationship  between  the  critical  indentation  depth  as  well  as  the  critical  stress  of  the  position
                 transferring point of the main stress (i.e. film potential fracture form) and the parameter of t/R. With the increase of t/R,
                 the  maximum  normal  stress  at  the  interface  both  increased  during  the  loading  and  unloading  processes,  and  the
                 possibility  of  I-type  tensile  delamination  increased,  while  the  maximum  tangential  stress  at  the  interface  slightly
                 decreased. However, due to the substrate plastic deformation, maximum tangential stresses at interfaces were close to its
                                         √
                 shear yield strength of 0.6σ ys ( 1/ 3σ ys , σ ys  is the substrate yield strength). To avoid the coupling influences of fracture
                 and delamination, a larger t/R should be applied to evaluate the normal adhesive performance at interfaces; While to
                 analyze the tangential adhesive properties a smaller t/R was the preference due to the relatively small impact of t/R on
                 tangential stresses at interfaces and the high risk of film cracking caused by a larger t/R.
                 Key words: thin hard solid film; contact geometric parameter; decoupling analysis; film fracture; interfacial
                 delamination; finite element analysis


                随着表面工程技术的快速发展,具有优异抗磨减                          的显著影响     [12-16] . 与此同时,不同损伤失效形式之间的
            摩性能、良好经济适用性和环境友好性的硬质固体薄                            相互影响进一步加剧了其渐进性演化过程的复杂性.
            膜被广泛应用于齿轮、轴承和活塞等零部件的摩擦表                            例如,Abdul等 和肖洋轶等 研究发现压痕作用下
                                                                            [17]
                                                                                        [18]
            界面的润滑和防护        [1-5] . 然而,薄膜自身的聚合(cohesive)       硬质薄膜抗断裂能力的提高会增加界面分层的风险;
                                                                         [19]
            性能和薄膜/基体的结合(adhesive)性能不足导致的薄                      而钟向丽等 则发现界面分层会加剧薄膜裂纹的扩
            膜断裂和界面分层         [6-8] ,严重阻碍了其在高速、高精度              展. 笔者前期研究结果也表明:接触区内,界面分层促
            和高可靠装备领域的工程应用.                                     进薄膜底部断裂;而接触区外,界面分层降低薄膜表
                                                                     [20]
                薄膜表面弯曲、拉伸导致的拉应力集中和膜基界                          面裂纹 . 因此,面向高接触应力下硬质薄膜断裂分
            面处弹塑性变形失配导致的拉伸和剪切应力集中,分                            层竞争耦合失效,开展基于损伤失效控制机理的加载
            别是引起薄膜断裂和界面分层的主要原因                    [9-13] ,并且   测试条件调控,实现多源损伤失效行为的解耦表征分

            其损伤失效过程受到系统本征材料参数(弹性模量、                            析,对于薄膜材料性能的定量测评具有重要意义.
            屈服强度、断裂强度和韧性等)、接触几何参数(薄膜                               压痕特别是球形纳/微米压痕测试是目前最为常
            厚度、接触配副尺寸等)及接触界面参数(摩擦系数等)                          用的膜基系统材料级试验评价分析方法之一. 压头尺
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20