Page 47 - 《摩擦学学报》2020年第3期

第 3 期 刘颍宾, 等: 列车车轮滚动接触疲劳裂纹评价研究 313

角度显著大于实际服役车轮接触疲劳裂纹扩展角度， rolling contact fatigue[J]. Wear, 1991, 144: 307–317. doi: 10.1016/
主要是因为标准试验存在水润滑，样品所受剪切应力 0043-1648(91)90022-M.
[ 6 ] Eadie D T, Elvidge D, Oldknow K. The effect of top of rail friction
小于实际服役车轮. 接触疲劳剥离坑截面观察发现，
modifier on wear and rolling contact fatigue: Full-scale Fail-wheel
标准样品剥离坑截面呈现浅碟形，深度为0.6 mm，而
test rig evaluation, analysis and modelling[J]. Wear, 2008, 265:
实际服役车轮表面接触疲劳剥离坑呈现深U形，深度
1222–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.029.
为1.5 mm，实际车轮剥离坑更深. [ 7 ] Li Xia, Wen Zefeng, Jin Xuesong. Investigation into wheel wear and
b. 由于标准样品所受剪切应力较小，所以标准样 fatigue of heavy-haul railways[J]. Journal of the China Railway
品硬化层深度远小于实际服役车轮硬化层深度. 透射 Society, 2011, 33(3): 28–34 (in Chinese) [李霞, 温泽峰, 金学松. 重
电镜观察结果表明，标准接触疲劳样品硬化层内的先 载铁路车轮磨耗和滚动接触疲劳研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2011, 33(3):
共析铁素体和珠光体中铁素体片层内均有位错线，而 28–34]. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2011.03.005.
[ 8 ] Zhou Yu, Huang Xuwei, Zhang Dongfeng, et al. Influence of axle
实际服役车轮硬化层内的先共析铁素体中发现了位
load of heavy-duty railway vehicles on fatigue crack initiation and
错墙，且珠光体内片层碎化，形成大量形变亚晶，进一
wear development of rails[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong
步证明实验室标准接触疲劳样品表层金属损伤程度
University, 2019, 36(4): 8–16 (in Chinese) [周宇, 黄旭炜, 张东风,
远远小于实际服役车轮. 等. 重载铁路车辆轴重对钢轨疲劳裂纹萌生和磨耗发展的影响
c. 车轮表面滚动接触疲劳裂纹大多呈三角形，具 [J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2019, 36(4): 8–16].
有一定的指向性，将其命名为“三角形指向性裂纹”， [ 9 ] He Chenggang, Zhou Guiyuan, Wang Juan, et al. Effect of curve
可据此判断实际服役车轮工况下引起滚动接触疲劳 radius of rail on rolling contact fatigue properties of wheel steel[J].
Tribology, 2014, 34(3): 256–261 (in Chinese) [何成刚, 周桂源, 王
的外载荷方向，为分析实际服役车轮滚动接触疲劳外
娟, 等. 曲率半径对车轮滚动接触疲劳性能的影响[J]. 摩擦学学
载荷方向的辨别提供了重要依据.
报 , 2014, 34(3): 256 –261]. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2009.
d. 提出了一种面向接触疲劳裂纹损伤程度的评
02.020.
价方法，采用试样表面滚动接触疲劳裂纹扩展的长度 [10] Tian Guangrong, Zhang Weihua, Chi Maoru. Study on curve
和裂纹向材料内部扩展的直线长度的乘积评价车轮 negotiation performance of heavy-haul train[J]. Journal of the China
材料滚动接触疲劳损伤的大小. Railway Society, 2009, 31(4): 98–103 (in Chinese) [田光荣, 张卫
华, 池茂儒. 重载列车曲线通过性能研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2009,
参 考 文 献
31(4): 98–103].
[ 1 ] Grassie S L. Rolling contact fatigue on the british railway system: [11] Zhou Guiyuan, He Chenggang, Liu Qiyue. Damage mechanism of
treatment[J]. Wear, 2005, 258: 1310–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2004. railway wheels under condition with angle of attack[J]. Tribology,
03.065. 2015, 35(6): 768–773 (in Chinese) [周桂源, 何成刚, 刘吉华, 等. 冲
[ 2 ] Ishida M, Ban T, Lida K, et al. Effect of moderating friction of 角工况下列车车轮损伤机理研究[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2015, 35(6):
wheel/rail interface on vehicle/track dynamic behavior[J]. Wear, 768–773]. doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2015.06.017.
2008, 265: 1497–1503. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.041. [12] Xiao Qian, Fang Jun, Wang Lei. Effect of friction coefficient on
[ 3 ] Yu Rongquan, Li Qiang, Li Na, et al. Numerical analysis on instant rolling contact fatigue of high speed train wheels[J]. China
prediction of rolling contact fatigue crack initiation life of wheel[J]. Railway Science, 2016, 37(3): 68–74 (in Chinese) [肖乾, 方骏, 王
Journal of the China Railway Society, 2015, 37(12): 20 –24 磊. 摩擦系数对高速列车车轮瞬时滚动接触疲劳的影响[J]. 中国
(in Chinese) [于荣泉, 李强, 李娜, 等. 车轮滚动接触疲劳裂纹萌生 铁 道 科 学 , 2016, 37(3): 68 –74]. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.
寿命预测[J]. 铁道学报, 2015, 37(12): 20–24]. doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 2016.03.010.
1001-8360.2015.12.004. [13] Zeng Dongfang. Study on methods for improving resistance to wear
[ 4 ] Garnham J E, Davis C L. The role of deformed rail microstructure and rolling contact fatigue of high-speed railway wheel steel[M].
on rolling contact fatigue initiation[J]. Wear, 2008, 265(9): Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017(in Chinese) [曾东方.
1363–1372. 高速铁路车轮钢磨损和滚动接触疲劳性的改善方法研究[D]. 成
[ 5 ] Bold P E, Brown M W, Allen R J. Shear mode crack growth and 都: 西南交通大学, 2017].