Page 15 - 《中国药科大学学报》2026年第1期
P. 15

第  57 卷第  1 期              张越阳,等:表面蛋白表征方法及其在疾病靶标发现中的应用                                       9

               [17]   Serrano-Pozo  A,  Das  S,  Hyman  BT.  APOE  and  Alzheimer’s  [33]   Wang YK, Qin W. Revealing protein trafficking by proximity
                    disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic  labeling-based proteomics[J]. Bioorg Chem, 2024, 143: 107041.
                    approaches[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2021, 20(1): 68-80.  [34]   Liu ZQ, Guo FH, Zhu YF, et al. Bioorthogonal photocatalytic
               [18]   Raulin AC, Doss SV, Trottier ZA, et al. ApoE in Alzheimer’s  proximity labeling in primary living samples[J]. Nat Commun.
                    disease: pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies[J]. Mol Neu-  2024, 15(1): 2712.
                    rodegener, 2022, 17(1): 72.                 [35]   Lin Z, Schaefer K, Lui I, et al. Multiscale photocatalytic prox-
               [19]   Mahan TE, Wang C, Bao X, et al. Selective reduction of astro-  imity  labeling  reveals  cell  surface  neighbors  on  and  between
                                                                     cells[J]. Science, 2024, 385(6706): eadl5763.
                    cyte  apoE3  and  apoE4  strongly  reduces  Aβ  accumulation  and
                                                                [36]   Loh KH, Stawski PS, Draycott AS, et al. Proteomic analysis of
                    plaque-related  pathology  in  a  mouse  model  of  amyloidosis[J].
                                                                     unbounded cellular compartments: synaptic clefts[J]. Cell, 2016,
                    Mol Neurodegener, 2022, 17(1): 13.
                                                                     166(5): 1295-1307. e21.
               [20]   Fonseca AL, da Silva VL, da Fonsêca MM, et al. Bioinformat-
                                                                [37]   Li JF, Han S, Li HJ, et al. Cell-surface proteomic profiling in
                    ics analysis of the human surfaceome reveals new targets for a
                                                                     the fly brain uncovers wiring regulators[J]. Cell, 2020, 180(2):
                    variety of tumor types[J]. Int J Genomics, 2016, 2016: 8346198.
                                                                     373-386. e15.
               [21]   Uceda AB, Mariño L, Casasnovas R, et al. An overview on gly-
                                                                [38]   Li  YN,  Wang  Y,  Yao  YT,  et  al.  Rapid  enzyme-mediated  bi-
                    cation: molecular mechanisms, impact on proteins, pathogene-
                                                                     otinylation  for  cell  surface  proteome  profiling[J].  Anal  Chem,
                    sis, and inhibition[J]. Biophys Rev, 2024, 16(2): 189-218.
                                                                     2021, 93(10): 4542-4551.
               [22]   Schjoldager KT, Narimatsu Y, Joshi HJ, et al. Global view of
                                                                [39]   Vilen Z, Reeves AE, O’Leary TR, et al. Cell surface engineer-
                    human  protein  glycosylation  pathways  and  functions[J].  Nat
                                                                     ing  enables  surfaceome  profiling[J].  ACS  Chem  Biol,  2023,
                    Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2020, 21(12): 729-749.
                                                                     18(4): 701-710.
               [23]   Li MY, Peng F, Wang GQ, et al. Coupling of cell surface bi-
                                                                [40]   Zhang ZJ, Wang YK, Lu WJ, et al. Spatiotemporally resolved
                    otinylation and SILAC-based quantitative proteomics identified
                                                                     mapping of extracellular proteomes via in vivo-compatible Ty-
                    myoferlin  as  a  potential  therapeutic  target  for  nasopharyngeal  roID[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1): 2553.
                    carcinoma metastasis[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021, 9: 621810.  [41]   Zhai YS, Huang XY, Zhang KR, et al. Spatiotemporal-resolved
               [24]   Li QY, Xie YX, Rice R, et al. A proximity labeling method for  protein networks profiling with photoactivation dependent prox-
                    protein–protein  interactions  on  cell  membrane[J].  Chem  Sci,  imity labeling[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 4906.
                    2022, 13(20): 6028-6038.                    [42]   Buksh BF, Knutson SD, Oakley JV, et al. μMap-red: proximity
               [25]   Shuster SA, Li JF, Chon U, et al. In situ cell-type-specific cell-  labeling by red light photocatalysis[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2022,
                    surface proteomic profiling in mice[J]. Neuron, 2022, 110(23):  144(14): 6154-6162.
                    3882-3896. e9.                              [43]   Chu BZ, He A, Tian YT, et al. Photoaffinity-engineered protein
               [26]   Tekaia  F,  Yeramian  E,  Dujon  B.  Amino  acid  composition  of  scaffold  for  systematically  exploring  native  phosphotyrosine
                    genomes,  lifestyles  of  organisms,  and  evolutionary  trends:  a  signaling  complexes  in  tumor  samples[J].  Proc  Natl  Acad  Sci
                    global  picture  with  correspondence  analysis[J].  Gene,  2002,  USA, 2018, 115(38): E8863-E8872.
                    297(1/2): 51-60.                            [44]   Zhang H, Li XJ, Martin DB, et al. Identification and quantifica-
               [27]   Bourseau-Guilmain E, Menard JA, Lindqvist E, et al. Hypoxia  tion of N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, sta-
                    regulates global  membrane  protein  endocytosis  through   cave-  ble isotope labeling and mass spectrometry[J]. Nat Biotechnol,
                    olin-1 in cancer cells[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 11371.  2003, 21(6): 660-666.
               [28]   Rose M, Cardon T, Aboulouard S, et al. Surfaceome proteomic  [45]   Wollscheid B, Bausch-Fluck D, Henderson C, et al. Mass-spec-
                    of glioblastoma revealed potential targets for immunotherapy[J].  trometric  identification  and  relative  quantification  of  N-linked
                    Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 746168.                 cell surface glycoproteins[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2009, 27(4): 378-
               [29]   Liu GP, Choi MH, Ma HY, et al. Bioorthogonal conjugation-as-  386.
                    sisted purification method for profiling cell surface proteome[J].  [46]   Bausch-Fluck D, Hofmann A, Bock T, et al. A mass spectro-
                    Anal Chem, 2022, 94(3): 1901-1909.               metric-derived  cell  surface  protein  atlas[J].  PLoS  One,  2015,
               [30]   Wang T, Ma SY, Ji GH, et al. A chemical proteomics approach  10(3): e0121314.
                    for global mapping of functional lysines on cell surface of liv-  [47]   Ferguson ID, Patiño-Escobar B, Tuomivaara ST, et al. The sur-
                    ing cell[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 2997.      faceome of  multiple  myeloma  cells  suggests  potential   im-
               [31]   Albright S, Cacace M, Tivon Y, et al. Cell surface labeling and  munotherapeutic strategies  and  protein  markers  of  drug   resis-
                    detection of protein tyrosine kinase 7 via covalent aptamers[J]. J  tance[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 4121.
                    Am Chem Soc, 2023, 145(30): 16458-16463.    [48]   Leung KK, Wilson GM, Kirkemo LL, et al. Broad and thematic
               [32]   Qin W, Cho KF, Cavanagh PE, et al. Deciphering molecular in-  remodeling  of  the  surfaceome  and  glycoproteome  on  isogenic
                    teractions by proximity labeling[J]. Nat Methods, 2021, 18(2):  cells transformed with driving proliferative oncogenes[J]. Proc
                    133-143.                                         Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117(14): 7764-7775.
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20