Page 36 - 《振动工程学报》2026年第2期

352 振 动 工 程 学 报 第 39 卷

the bridge dynamic responses[J]. Marine Structures， 2022， [24] MOUKALLED F，MANGANI L，DARWISH M. The Finite
83：103174. Volume Method in Computational Fluid Dynamics： An
[15] JIN C K， KIM M H， CHUNG W C， et al. Time-domain Advanced Introduction with OpenFOAM® and Matlab[M].
coupled analysis of curved floating bridge under wind and Cham：Springer International Publishing，2016.
wave excitations[J]. Ocean Systems Engineering， 2020， [25] 约翰 D. 安德森. 计算流体力学基础及其应用 [M]. 吴颂平，
10（4）：399-414. 刘赵淼，译. 北京：机械工业出版社. 2007.
[16] XIANG S，CHENG B，TANG M，et al. Effects of spatial [26] VERSTEEG H K，MALALASEKERA W. An Introduction to
inhomogeneity of wave excitations on structural behaviors of Computational Fluid Dynamics[M]. 2nd ed. Halow：
multi-span floating bridges[J]. Ocean Engineering， 2022， Pearson/Prentice Hall，2007.
243：110340. [27] 竺艳蓉. 海洋工程波浪力学 [M]. 天津：天津大学出版社，
[17] CUI M H，CHENG Z S，MOAN T. A generic method for 1991.
assessment of inhomogeneous wave load effects of very long ZHU Yanrong. Wave Mechanics of Ocean Engineering[M].
floating bridges[J]. Marine Structures，2022，83：103186. Tianjin：Tianjin University Press，1991.
[18] SHA Y Y，AMDAHL J，AALBERG A，et al. Numerical [28] SUN Z，LIU G J，ZOU L，et al. Investigation of non-linear
investigations of the dynamic response of a floating bridge ship hydroelasticity by CFD-FEM coupling method[J]. Jour-
under environmental loadings[J]. Ships and Offshore Struc- nal of Marine Science and Engineering，2021，9（5）：511.
tures，2018，13（sup1）：113-126. [29] LAKSHMYNARAYANANA P A K， HIRDARIS S.
[19] DAI J，LEIRA B J，MOAN T，et al. Effect of wave inho- Comparison of nonlinear one- and two-way FFSI methods for
mogeneity on fatigue damage of mooring lines of a side- the prediction of the symmetric response of a containership in
anchored floating bridge[J]. Ocean Engineering， 2021， waves[J]. Ocean Engineering，2020，203：107179.
219：108304. [30] 竺艳蓉. 几种波浪理论适用范围的分析 [J]. 海岸工程，
[20] WAN L， JIANG D Q， DAI J. Numerical modelling and 1983，2（2）：11-27.
dynamic response analysis of curved floating bridges with a ZHU Yanrong. Analyses of the ranges of validity for several
small rise-span ratio[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engi- wave theories[J]. Coastal Engineering，1983，2（2）：11-27.
neering，2020，8（6）：467. [31] KOSTIKOV V， HAYATDAVOODI M， ERTEKIN R C.
[21] WAN L，DAI J，JIANG D Q，et al. Parametric study and Hydroelastic interaction of nonlinear waves with floating
dynamic response analysis of three single curved discrete sheets[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics，
pontoon floating bridges[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures， 2021，35（4）：515-537.
2022，17（8）：1788-1801. [32] 浙江省交通规划设计研究院有限公司. 浙江省公路工程设
[22] LI S，FU S X，WEI W，et al. A comparison study on the 计标准化组合钢桁架桥通用图: GQ/TY-GHL/80—2018[S].
hydroelasticity of two types of floating bridges in inhomoge- 2018.
neous wave conditions[C]//Proceedings of Volume 7A： Zhejiang Institute of Communications Co., Ltd. Standardized
Ocean Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engi- design drawings for composite steel truss highway bridges in
neers，2018：V07AT06A045. Zhejiang Province: GQ/TY-GHL/80—2018 [S]. 2018.
[23] Siemens. Star-CCM+ 2020.1 Manual[EB/OL]. (2020.1.1)
[2024.1.1]. https://www.tech-doc.cn/wp-content/uploads/Free/ 通信作者：蒋冬启（1989—），男，博士，副教授。
StarCCM2020/136ONL/online/index.html E-mail：jiangdongqi@njust.edu.cn