Page 86 - 《渔业研究》2025年第3期
P. 86

第 3 期          张    艺: 不同碳源对大黄鱼育苗水体生物絮团形成、水质及育苗效果的影响                                   343

                   feed in minimal-exchange, superintensive culture systems  China, 2013, 37(8): 1220 − 1228.
                   [J]. Aquaculture, 2010, 299(1−4): 89 − 98.  [20]   杨章武,张哲,葛辉,等. 几种不同碳源对凡纳滨对
              [14]   崔晓翠,王印庚,陈霞,等. 槟榔、川楝子复方中草                       虾生物絮团技术育苗效果的影响         [J]. 福建水产,2015,
                   药对大黄鱼    4  种酶活性的影响及对刺激隐核虫的杀灭                    37(5) :347 − 352.
                   效果分析    [J]. 中国水产科学,2017,24(2) :362 −            Yang Z W, Zhang Z, Ge H, et al. The effects of different
                   373.                                             carbon  sources  on  larval  rearing  of  Litopenaeus  van-
                   Cui X C, Wang Y G, Chen X, et al. Effects of a Chinese  namei by biofloc technology[J]. Journal of Fujian Fish-
                   herbal compound on non-specific immune activities and  eries, 2015, 37(5): 347 − 352.
                   extermination  of  parasite  Cryptocaryon  irritans  in  Lar-  [21]   Avnimelech  Y.  Biofloc  technology:  a  practical  guide
                   imichthys  crocea[J].  Journal  of  Fishery  Sciences  of  book[M]. 2nd  ed.  Baton  Rouge:  The  World   Aquacul-
                   China, 2017, 24(2): 362 − 373.                   ture Society, 2012.
              [15]   中华人民共和国农业农村部渔业渔政管理局,全国水                  [22]   Wilén B M, Jin B, Lant P. The influence of key chemic-
                   产技术推广总站,中国水产学会. 2021         中国渔业统计              al constituents in activated sludge on surface and floccu-
                   年鉴  [M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2021:26.                     lating properties[J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(9): 2127 −
                   Bruea of Fisheries, Administration of the Ministry of Ag-  2139.
                   riculture  and  Rural  Affairs  of  the  People’s  Republic  of  [23]   Azim M E, Little D C. The biofloc technology (BFT) in
                   China, National Fisheries Technology Extension Center,  indoor  tanks:  water  quality,  biofloc  composition,  and
                   China Society of Fisheries. 2021 China fisheries statis-  growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nilotic-
                   tical  yearbook  [M].  Beijing:  China  Agriculture  Press,  us)[J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 283(1−4): 29 − 35.
                   2021: 26.                                  [24]   Ballester E L C, Abreu P C, Cavalli R O, et al. Effect of
              [16]   黄伟卿,刘家富,刘招坤. 大黄鱼养殖技术            [M]. 青         practical diets  with  different  protein  levels  on  the   per-
                   岛:中国海洋大学出版社,2019:119−120.                        formance of Farfantepenaeus paulensis juveniles nursed
                   Huang W Q, Liu J F, Liu Z K, et al. Large yellow croak-  in a zero exchange suspended microbial flocs intensive
                   er  cultivation  techniques  [M].  Qingdao:  China  Ocean  system[J].  Aquaculture  Nutrition,  2010,  16(2):  163  −
                   University Press, 2019: 119 − 120.               172.
              [17]   国家环境保护总局, 《水和废水监测分析方法》编委                 [25]   Wilén B M, Onuki M, Hermansson M, et al. Microbial
                   会. 水和废水监测分析方法        [M]. 4  版. 北京:中国环           community structure in activated sludge floc analysed by
                   境科学出版社,2002.                                     fluorescence in situ hybridization and its relation to floc
                   State Environmental Protection Administration, Editori-  stability[J].  Water  Research,  2008,  42(8−9):  2300  −
                   al Board of Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Ana-  2308.
                   lysis Methods formulated by the National Environment-  [26]   Bodík I, Blšťáková A, Sedláček S, et al. Biodiesel waste
                   al Protection Administration. Water and wastewater moni-  as source of organic carbon for municipal WWTP deni-
                   toring and analysis methods[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China  trification[J].  Bioresource  Technology,  2009,  100(8):
                   Environmental Science Press, 2002.               2452 − 2456.
              [18]   沈萍. 微生物学  [M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2000:          [27]   罗国芝,吴慧芳,谭洪新. 自养硝化过程去除循环水
                   129 − 134.                                       养殖系统水体中氨氮的研究进展         [J]. 淡水渔业,2019,
                   Shen  P.  Microbiology  [M].  Beijing:  Higher  Education  49(2) :83 − 88.
                   Press, 2000: 129 − 134.                          Luo G Z, Wu H F, Tan H X. Progress on removing am-
              [19]   卢炳国,王海英,谢骏,等. 不同        C/N  水平对草鱼池            monia nitrogen from autotrophic nitrification in recircu-
                   生物絮团的形成及其水质的影响              [J]. 水产学报,           lating  aquaculture  system[J].  Freshwater  Fisheries,
                   2013,37(8) :1220 − 1228.                         2019, 49(2): 83 − 88.
                   Lu B G, Wang H Y, Xie J, et al. Effect of C/N ratio on  [28]   陈晓庆. 絮团粒径、碳源添加方式和絮团量对生物絮
                   bioflocs  formation  and  water  quality  in  zero-water  ex-  凝养殖系统氨氮控制的影响研究  [D]. 上海:上海海
                   change  grass  carp  tanks[J].  Journal  of  Fisheries  of  洋大学,2019.
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91