Page 26 - 卫星导航2021年第1-2合期
P. 26

El‑Sheimy and Li  Satell Navig             (2021) 2:7                                   Page 16 of 23













































              Fig. 8  Inertial/ WiFi/ magnetic integrated smartphone navigation results (modifed on the results reported in Li et al. (2017))



            multi-source fusion, the ratio of large errors was reduced   with an approximate navigation accuracy of a centim-
            to 0.8%. Tis use case indicates the importance of sensor   eter to decimeter level. However, during ultrasonic sig-
            interaction and robust multi-sensor fusion.       nal outages, the accuracy was degraded to 0.2, 0.6, 1.0,
                                                              1.3, 1.8, and 4.3 m in the mean value when navigating
            Drones                                            for 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 s, respectively.
            Tis  use  case  integrated  a  low-cost  IMU,  a  barometer,
            a mass-fow sensor, and ultrasonic sensors for indoor
            drone navigation (Li et al. 2019a). Te forward velocity   Robots
            from the mass fow sensor and the lateral and vertical   Tis use case integrated a photodiode and a cam-
            NHC can be utilized for 3D velocity updates.      era indoor robot navigation (Zhuang et al. 2019). Fig-
              Figure  9 shows the test scenario and selected results.   ure 10 shows the test platform and selected results. Te
            Indoor fight tests were conducted in a 20  m by 20  m   size of the test area was 5  m by 5  m by 2.84  m, with
            area with a quadrotor drone, which was equipped with   fve CREE T6 Light-Emitting-Diodes (LEDs) mounted
            an InvenSense MPU6000 IMU, a Honeywell HMC 5983   evenly on the ceiling as light beacons. Te receiver used
            magnetometer triad, a TE MS5611 barometer, a Sen-  in the experiments contained an OPT101 photodiode
            sirion SFM3000 mass-fow sensor, and a Marvelmind   and a front camera of a smartphone. Te receiver was
            ultrasonic beacon. Additionally, four ultrasonic beacons   mounted on a mobile robot at a height of 1.25 m.
            were installed on four static leveling pillars, with a height   Field  test  results  showed  that  the  proposed  system
            of 4 m.                                           provided a semi-real-time positioning solution with an
              When ultrasonic ranges were used, the system    average 3D positioning accuracy of 15.6 cm in dynamic
            achieved a continuous and smooth navigation solution,   tests. Te accuracy is expected to be further improved
                                                              when more sensors are used.
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31