Page 118 - 《水产学报》2025年第10期
P. 118

李森栋,等                                                                水产学报, 2025, 49(10): 109609

              (ImageJ  V1.8.0.112,  USA).  Since  PCNA  protein  fied  in  the  CW  group,  including  752  upregulated
              is  usually  considered  as  a  cell  proliferation  and 699 downregulated genes (Fig.2-a). In contrast,
              marker,  the  proliferation  potency  of  cells  was  the NC group showed only 397 DEGs (170 upregu-
              always  assessed  as  following:  the  proliferation  lated, 227  downregulated),  indicating  less   pro-
              rate  =  the  number  of  cells  with  PCNA  positive  nounced transcriptomic disturbance under WS sup-
              signals / the total number of cells •100%.       plementation  (Fig.2-b).  GO  enrichment  analysis

                                                               showed that DEGs in CW vs. CC were significantly
              1.12    Statistical analysis
                                                               enriched  in  biological  processes  such  as  protein
                   Statistical  analyses  were  conducted  using  folding,  response  to  stimulus,  signal  transduction,
              GraphPad  Prism  version  10  (GraphPad  Software,  and immune system process. KEGG pathway ana-
              San Diego, CA, USA). Data are presented as mean ±  lysis  revealed  that  the  DEGs  were  significantly
              standard  error  of  the  mean  (SEM).  One-way  ana-  enriched  in  MAPK  signaling  pathway,  HIF-1  sig-
              lysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed for mul-  naling pathway, NOD-like receptor signaling path-
              tiple group comparisons, followed by Tukey’s post-  way,  oxidative  phosphorylation,  and  neuroactive
              hoc test for pairwise comparisons. For comparisons  ligand–receptor interaction.
              between two groups, an unpaired t-test was applied.  Notably, several classical stress-related genes
              A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistic-  were markedly upregulated in the CW group. These
              ally significant.                                included  hsp70  (log FC  =  2.21),  hsp90aa1.1
                                                                                  2
                                                               (log FC  =  1.82),  sod1  (log FC  =  1.63),  and  il1b
                                                                  2
                                                                                       2
              2    Results
                                                               (log FC  =  2.04),  indicating  activation  of  the  heat
                                                                  2

                                                               shock response and inflammatory signaling. Mean-
              2.1      Differential  Expressed  Genes  induced  by
                                                               while,  pro-apoptotic  genes  such  as  bax  (log FC  =
                                                                                                     2
              stress stimuli in Brain Tissue
                                                               1.34) and casp9 (log FC = 1.21) were also signific-
                                                                                2
                   To  determine  the  molecular  alterations  in  antly upregulated (Fig.2-c, d). In contrast, in the NC
              brain tissues during responding to acute stress and  group,  these  genes  exhibited  much  lower  fold
              effects of dietary WS on stress response in darkbar-  changes or remained unchanged, suggesting a sup-
              bel  catfish,  RNA-seq  analysis  was  performed  on  pressive effect of WS on stress-induced gene activa-
              brain tissues from control (CC), acute stress (CW),  tion.

              and  WS-supplemented  (NC)  groups.  A  total  of
                                                               2.2      Gene  Ontology  and  Pathway  Enrichment
              57.55 million  reads  were  generated  prior  to   filter-
                                                               Analysis
              ing.  The  data  exhibited  high  quality,  with  a  Q20
                                                                   The  distinct  gene  expression  patterns  across
              base percentage of 97.99% and a Q30 base percent-
                                                               the four experimental groups (CC, CP, NC, and NP)
              age of 94.07%. The GC content was approximately
              43.72%. After filtering, the average read length for  were illustrated with a heatmap (Fig. 3-a). Through
              both ends was 149 bp, and the duplication rate was  the GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs from con-
              calculated at 3.72%. The peak insert size was 259  trol groups without WS dietary (CP vs. CC) (Fig. 3-b),
              bp. Overall, the sequencing data demonstrated high  the Go terms were significantly enriched in categor-
              quality,  with  substantial  reductions  in  sequencing  ies related to synaptic and trans-synaptic signaling.
              artifacts  after  filtering,  ensuring  the  reliability  of  Additionally, the DEGs were also mainly involved
              subsequent analyses. To validate the RNA-seq data,  in  the  biological  process  associated  with  blood
              qPCR  was  performed  for  selected  genes  with  the  coagulation  and  the  response  to  wounding.  The
              gene specific primers (Table S2).                KEGG pathway analysis showed of the DEGs from
                   Compared with the CC group, a total of 1 451  control  groups  without  WS  dietary  (CP  vs. CC),
              differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identi-  were mainly involved in the calcium signaling path-

              https://www.china-fishery.cn                           中国水产学会主办    sponsored by China Society of Fisheries
                                                            8
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123