Page 350 - 《软件学报》2026年第3期
P. 350
章程 等: 人机共驾场景中驾驶权接管技术研究综述 1313
making tasks: A Bayesian approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2025, 200: 110872. [doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2025.110872]
[108] Sun QY, Zhou H, Fu R, Xu YN, Wang C, Guo YS. Driver’s trust assessment based on situational awareness under human-machine
collaboration driving. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 145: 110243. [doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110243]
[109] Akash K, Polson K, Reid T, Jain N. Improving human-machine collaboration through transparency-based feedback—Part I: Human trust
and workload model. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 51(34): 315–321. [doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.028]
[110] Lee J, Moray N. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 1992, 35(10): 1243–1270.
[doi: 10.1080/00140139208967392]
[111] Lee JD, Moray N. Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. Int’l Journal of Human-computer Studies, 1994,
40(1): 153–184. [doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007]
[112] Li Z, Lu Z, Yin M. Modeling human trust and reliance in AI-assisted decision making: A Markovian approach. Proc. of the AAAI Conf.
on Artificial Intelligence, 37(5): 6056–6064. [doi: 10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25748]
[113] Azevedo-Sa H, Jayaraman SK, Esterwood CT, Yang XJ, Robert LP Jr., Tilbury DM. Real-time estimation of drivers’ trust in automated
driving systems. Int’l Journal of Social Robotics, 2021, 13(8): 1911–1927. [doi: 10.1007/s12369-020-00694-1]
[114] Dzindolet MT, Pierce LG, Beck HP, Dawe LA, Anderson BW. Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Military
Psychology, 2001, 13(3): 147–164. [doi: 10.1207/S15327876MP1303_2]
[115] Hu WL, Akash K, Jain N, Reid T. Real-time sensing of trust in human-machine interactions. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, 49(32): 48–53.
[doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.188]
[116] Akash K, Hu WL, Jain N, Reid T. A classification model for sensing human trust in machines using EEG and GSR. ACM Trans. on
Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 2018, 8(4): 27. [doi: 10.1145/3132743]
[117] Jian JY, Bisantz AM, Drury CG. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int’l Journal of
Cognitive Ergonomics, 2000, 4(1): 53–71. [doi: 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04]
[118] Körber M, Bengler K. Potential individual differences regarding automation effects in automated driving. In: Proc. of the 15th Int’l
Conf. on Human Computer Interaction. Puerto de la Cruz Tenerife: ACM, 2014. 22. [doi: 10.1145/2662253.2662275]
[119] Li QK, Wang ZY, Liu WM, Wang WJ, Zeng C, Cheng B. Understanding human drivers’ trust in highly automated vehicles via
structural equation modeling. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Intelligent Technologies. Hubli: IEEE, 2022. 1–7. [doi: 10.1109/
CONIT55038.2022.9847690]
[120] Seet MS, Dragomir A, Mathialagan I, Ann LY, Binte Zaid Z, Ramapatna SL, Thakor NV, Bezerianos A. Subtype divergences of trust in
autonomous vehicles: Towards optimisation of driver-vehicle trust management. In: Proc. of the 23rd IEEE Int’l Conf. on Intelligent
Transportation Systems (ITSC). Rhodes: IEEE, 2020. [doi: 10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294495]
[121] Wojton HM, Porter D, Lane ST, Bieber C, Madhavan P. Initial validation of the trust of automated systems test (TOAST). The Journal
of Social Psychology, 2020, 160(6): 735–750. [doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1749020]
[122] Fu C, Yao XQ, Yang X, Zheng L, Li JB, Wang YW. Trust game database: Behavioral and EEG data from two trust games. Frontiers in
Psychology, 2019, 10: 2656. [doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02656]
[123] Palmer S, Richards D, Shelton-Rayner G, Inch D, Izzetoglu K. Human-agent teaming—An evolving interaction paradigm: An innovative
measure of trust. In: Proc. of the 20th Int’l Symp. on Aviation Psychology. 2019. 438–443.
[124] Ajenaghughrure IB, Sousa SDC, Lamas D. Measuring trust with psychophysiological signals: A systematic mapping study of
approaches used. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2020, 4(3): 63. [doi: 10.3390/mti4030063]
[125] Robinette P, Li WC, Allen R, Howard AM, Wagner AR. Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. In: Proc. of the 11th
ACM/IEEE Int’l Conf. on Human-robot Interaction (HRI). Christchurch: IEEE, 2016. [doi: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451740]
[126] de Visser EJ, Monfort SS, Goodyear K, Lu L, O’Hara M, Lee MR, Parasuraman R, Krueger F. A little anthropomorphism goes a long
way: Effects of oxytocin on trust, compliance, and team performance with automated agents. Human Factors, 2017, 59(1): 116–133.
[doi: 10.1177/0018720816687205]
[127] Rezvani T, Driggs-Campbell K, Sadigh D, Sastry SS, Seshia SA, Bajcsy R. Towards trustworthy automation: User interfaces that
convey internal and external awareness. In: Proc. of the 19th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). Rio de
Janeiro: IEEE, 2016. [doi: 10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795627]
[128] Gupta K, Hajika R, Pai YS, Duenser A, Lochner M, Billinghurst M. Measuring human trust in a virtual assistant using physiological
sensing in virtual reality. In: Proc. of the 2020 IEEE Conf. on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). Atlanta: IEEE, 2020. [doi:
10.1109/VR46266.2020.00099]
[129] Akash K, McMahon G, Reid T, Jain N. Human trust-based feedback control: Dynamically varying automation transparency to optimize
human-machine interactions. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2020, 40(6): 98–116. [doi: 10.1109/MCS.2020.3019151]
[130] Huang SH, Bhatia K, Abbeel P, Dragan AD. Establishing appropriate trust via critical states. In: Proc. of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ Int’l Conf.
on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Madrid: IEEE, 2018. [doi: 10.1109/IROS.2018.8593649]
[131] Schaefer KE. Measuring trust in human robot interactions: Development of the “trust perception scale-HRI”. In: Mirttu R, Sofge D,

