Page 348 - 《软件学报》2026年第3期

章程 等: 人机共驾场景中驾驶权接管技术研究综述 1311

Proc. of the 2020 Int’l Conf. on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). Jeju: IEEE, 2020. 1912–1917.
[doi: 10.1109/ICTC49870.2020.9289513]
[62] Brandenburg S, Chuang L. Take-over requests during highly automated driving: How should they be presented and under what
conditions? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 66: 214–225. [doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.023]
[63] Hong S, Yang JH. Effect of multimodal takeover request issued through A-pillar LED light, earcon, speech message, and haptic seat in
conditionally automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2022, 89: 488–500. [doi: 10.1016/j.
trf.2022.07.012]
[64] Robertson RD, Meister SR, Vanlaar WGM, Mainegra Hing M. Automated vehicles and behavioural adaptation in Canada.
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 104: 50–57. [doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.005]
[65] Körber M, Baseler E, Bengler K. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied
Ergonomics, 2018, 66: 18–31. [doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006]
[66] Gold C, Körber M, Lechner D, Bengler K. Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of
traffic density. Human Factors, 2016, 58(4): 642–652. [doi: 10.1177/0018720816634226]
[67] Radlmayr J, Gold C, Lorenz L, Farid M, Bengler K. How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in
highly automated driving. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2014, 58(1): 2063–2067. [doi: 10.1177/
1541931214581434]
[68] Zhai JD, Lu GQ. A study of how drivers’ subjective workload and driving performance change under varying levels of automation and
critical situations. In: Proc. of the 19th COTA Int’l Conf. of Transportation Professionals. Nanjing: ASCE, 2019. 344–355.
[69] Abe G, Sato K, Uchida N, Itoh M. Effect of changes in levels of automated driving on manual control recovery. IFAC-PapersOnLine,
2019, 52(19): 79–84. [doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.113]
[70] Madigan R, Louw T, Merat N. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers’ lane changing behaviour. PLoS One, 2018,
13(2): e0192190. [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192190]
[71] Feierle A, Schlichtherle F, Bengler K. Augmented reality head-up display: A visual support during malfunctions in partially automated
driving? IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(5): 4853–4865. [doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3119774]
[72] Yun HN, Yang JH. Multimodal warning design for take-over request in conditionally automated driving. European Transport Research
Review, 2020, 12(1): 34. [doi: 10.1186/s12544-020-00427-5]
[73] Salminen K, Farooq A, Rantala J, Surakka V, Raisamo R. Unimodal and multimodal signals to support control transitions in
semiautonomous vehicles. In: Proc. of the 11th Int’l Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
Utrecht: ACM, 2019. 308–318. [doi: 10.1145/3342197.3344522]
[74] Dogan E, Rahal MC, Deborne R, Delhomme P, Kemeny A, Perrin J. Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: Effects of
anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2017, 46:
205–215. [doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.012]
[75] Zhang B, de Winter J, Varotto S, Happee R, Martens M. Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of
129 studies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 64: 285–307. [doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.020]
[76] Bazilinskyy P, Eriksson A, Petermeijer B, de Winter J. Usefulness and satisfaction of take-over requests for highly automated driving.
2017. https://bazilinskyy.github.io/publications/bazilinskyy2017usefulness.pdf
[77] van den Beukel AP, van der Voort MC. The influence of time-criticality on situation awareness when retrieving human control after
automated driving. In: Proc. of the 16th Int’l IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). Hague: IEEE, 2013. 2000–2005.
[doi: 10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728523]
[78] Roche F, Brandenburg S. Should the urgency of visual-tactile takeover requests match the criticality of takeover situations? IEEE Trans.
on Intelligent Vehicles, 2020, 5(2): 306–313. [doi: 10.1109/TIV.2019.2955906]
[79] Kim JW, Yang JH. Understanding metrics of vehicle control take-over requests in simulated automated vehicles. Int’l Journal of
Automotive Technology, 2020, 21(3): 757–770. [doi: 10.1007/s12239-020-0074-z]
[80] Wickens CD. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2002, 3(2): 159–177. [doi: 10.
1080/14639220210123806]
[81] Forster Y, Naujoks F, Neukum A, Huestegge L. Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional
automation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 109: 18–28. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.019]
[82] Telpaz A, Rhindress B, Zelman I, Tsimhoni O. Haptic seat for automated driving: Preparing the driver to take control effectively. In:
Proc. of the 7th Int’l Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Nottingham: ACM, 2015. 23–30.
[doi: 10.1145/2799250.2799267]
[83] Petermeijer S, Bazilinskyy P, Bengler K, de Winter J. Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver
back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 62: 204–215. [doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023]
[84] Kim H, Kim W, Kim J, Lee SJ, Yoon D. A study on the effects of providing situation awareness information for the control authority