Page 346 - 《软件学报》2026年第3期

章程 等: 人机共驾场景中驾驶权接管技术研究综述 1309

[16] Wörle J, Metz B, Othersen I, Baumann M. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up. Accident Analysis
& Prevention, 2020, 144: 105617. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105617]
[17] Gomes GD, Flynn R, Murray N. Continuous-time feedback device to enhance situation awareness during take-over requests in
automated driving conditions. In: Proc. of the 13th ACM Multimedia Systems Conf. Athlone: ACM, 2022. 319–323. [doi: 10.1145/
3524273.3532905]
[18] Moessinger M, Stürmer R, Mühlensiep M. Auditive beta stimulation as a countermeasure against driver fatigue. PLoS One, 2021, 16(1):
e0245251. [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245251]
[19] Hong S, Maeng J, Kim HJ, Yang JH. Development of warning methods for planned and unplanned takeover requests in a simulated
automated driving vehicle. In: Proc. of the 14th Int’l Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Seoul:
ACM, 2022. 65–74. [doi: 10.1145/3543174.3545999]
[20] Wang Y, Zhang W, Zhou RG. Speech-based takeover requests in conditionally automated driving: Effects of different voices on the
driver takeover performance. Applied Ergonomics, 2022, 101: 103695. [doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103695]
[21] Parasuraman R, Sheridan T B, Wickens CD. Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically
supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2008, 2(2): 140–160. [doi: 10.1518/
155534308X284417]
[22] Muslim H, Leung CK, Itoh M. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving
automation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 174: 106719. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106719]
[23] Spence C, Ho C. Tactile and multisensory spatial warning signals for drivers. IEEE Trans. on Haptics, 2008, 1(2): 121–129. [doi: 10.
1109/TOH.2008.14]
[24] Li WY, Li QK, Li SE, Li RJ, Ren YG, Wang WJ. Indirect shared control through non-zero sum differential game for cooperative
automated driving. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(9): 15980–15992. [doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3146895]
[25] Mörtl P, Ebinger N, Marx C, Trösterer S. Two methods to bring drivers back better into the loop after automated driving at SAE Level 3.
In: Proc. of the 14th Int’l Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Seoul: ACM, 2022. 206–208.
[doi: 10.1145/3544999.3551500]
[26] Okada K, Sonoda K, Wada T. Transferring from automated to manual driving when traversing a curve via haptic shared control. IEEE
Trans. on Intelligent Vehicles, 2021, 6(2): 266–275. [doi: 10.1109/TIV.2020.3018753]
[27] Sonoda K, Okada K, Sato K, Abe G, Wada T. Does shared mode improve steering and vehicle motions during control transition from
automated to manual driving in real passenger car? IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 85880–85890. [doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3197885]
[28] Gonçalves RC, Louw TL, Madigan R, Quaresma M, Romano R, Merat N. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine
interfaces on drivers’ gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention,
2022, 174: 106726. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106726]
[29] Barua S, Ahmed MU, Ahlström C, Begum S. Automatic driver sleepiness detection using EEG, EOG and contextual information. Expert
Systems with Applications, 2019, 115: 121–135. [doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.054]
[30] Du N, Zhou F, Pulver E, Tilbury D, Robert LP, Pradhan AK, Yang XJ. Predicting takeover performance in conditionally automated
driving. In: Proc. of the 2020 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu: ACM, 2020. 1–8. [doi: 10.1145/3334480.
3382963]
[31] Huang GJ, Pitts BJ. Takeover requests for automated driving: The effects of signal direction, lead time, and modality on takeover
performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 165: 106534. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106534]
[32] Ding TC, Zhi JY, Zou R, Wang ZY, He SJ, Jing CH. The impact of initial trust levels in automation on takeover performance, workload,
and visual behavior in urban rail transit driving tasks. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230654]
[33] Miller JA, Nikan S, Zaki MH. Navigating the handover: Reviewing takeover requests in level 3 autonomous vehicles. IEEE Open
Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2024, 5: 1073–1087. [doi: 10.1109/OJVT.2024.3443630]
[34] McDonald AD, Alambeigi H, Engström J, Markkula G, Vogelpohl T, Dunne J, Yuma N. Toward computational simulations of behavior
during automated driving takeovers: A review of the empirical and modeling literatures. Human Factors, 2019, 61(4): 642–688. [doi: 10.
1177/0018720819829572]
[35] DeGuzman CA, Hopkins SA, Donmez B. Driver takeover performance and monitoring behavior with driving automation at system-limit
versus system-malfunction failures. Transportation Research Record, 2020, 2674(4): 140–151. [doi: 10.1177/0361198120912228]
[36] Soares S, Lobo A, Ferreira S, Cunha L, Couto A. Takeover performance evaluation using driving simulation: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. European Transport Research Review, 2021, 13(1): 47. [doi: 10.1186/s12544-021-00505-2]
[37] Chen HL, Zhao XH, Chen C, Li ZL, Li HJ, Wang QH. A systematic review on test performance of the driver takeover process in
automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2025, 215: 108012. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108012]
[38] Morales-Alvarez W, Sipele O, Léberon R, Tadjine HH, Olaverri-Monreal C. Automated driving: A literature review of the take over