Page 347 - 《软件学报》2026年第3期

1310 软件学报 2026 年第 37 卷第 3 期

request in conditional automation. Electronics, 2020, 9(12): 2087. [doi: 10.3390/electronics9122087]
[39] Yoon SH, Kim YW, Ji YG. The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions. Accident Analysis &
Prevention, 2019, 123: 150–158. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.018]
[40] Eriksson A, Stanton NA. Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human
Factors, 2017, 59(4): 689–705. [doi: 10.1177/0018720816685832]
[41] Jarosch O, Kuhnt M, Paradies S, Bengler K. It’s out of our hands now! Effects of non-driving related tasks during highly automated
driving on drivers’ fatigue. In: Proc. of the 9th Int’l Driving Symp. on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle
Design. 2017. 319–325.
[42] Chen HL, Zhao XH, Li ZL, Li HJ, Gong JG, Wang QH. Study on the influence factors of takeover behavior in automated driving based
on survival analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2023, 95: 281–296. [doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2023.04.
012]
[43] Lin QF, Lyu Y, Zhang KF, Ma XW. Effects of non-driving related tasks on readiness to take over control in conditionally automated
driving. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2021, 22(8): 629–633. [doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1969373]
[44] Griffith M, Akkem R, Maheshwari J, Seacrist T, Arbogast KB, Graci V. The effect of a startle-based warning, age, sex, and secondary
task on takeover actions in critical autonomous driving scenarios. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2023, 11: 1147606.
[doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1147606]
[45] Li CM, Li XN, Lv M, Chen F, Ma XX, Zhang L. How does approaching a lead vehicle and monitoring request affect drivers’ takeover
performance? A simulated driving study with functional MRI. Int’l Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 19(1):
412. [doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010412]
[46] Wang QH, Chen HL, Gong JG, Zhao XH, Li ZL. Studying driver’s perception arousal and takeover performance in autonomous driving.
Sustainability, 2022, 15(1): 445. [doi: 10.3390/su15010445]
[47] Li S, Blythe P, Guo WH, Namdeo A. Investigating the effects of age and disengagement in driving on driver’s takeover control
performance in highly automated vehicles. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2019, 42(5): 470–497. [doi: 10.1080/03081060.
2019.1609221]
[48] Harari RE, Lamb R, Fathi R, Hulme K. Virtual reality tour for first-time users of highly automated cars: Comparing the effects of virtual
environments with different levels of interaction fidelity. Applied Ergonomics, 2021, 90: 103226. [doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103226]
[49] Zhou HP, Itoh M, Kitazaki S. How does explanation-based knowledge influence driver take-over in conditional driving automation?
IEEE Trans. on Human-machine Systems, 2021, 51(3): 188–197. [doi: 10.1109/THMS.2021.3051342]
[50] Feldhütter A, Kroll D, Bengler K. Wake up and take over! The effect of fatigue on the take-over performance in conditionally automated
driving. In: Proc. of the 21st Int’l Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). Maui: IEEE, 2018. 2080–2085. [doi: 10.1109/
ITSC.2018.8569545]
[51] Jarosch O, Bellem H, Bengler K. Effects of task-induced fatigue in prolonged conditional automated driving. Human Factors, 2019,
61(7): 1186–1199. [doi: 10.1177/0018720818816226]
[52] Rangesh A, Deo N, Greer R, Gunaratne P, Trivedi MM. Predicting take-over time for autonomous driving with real-world data: Robust
data augmentation, models, and evaluation. arXiv:2107.12932, 2021.
[53] Guettas A, Ayad S, Kazar O. Driver state monitoring system: A review. In: Proc. of the 4th Int’l Conf. on Big Data and Internet of
Things. Rabat: ACM, 2019. 28. [doi: 10.1145/3372938.3372966]
[54] Lu ZJ, de Winter JCF. A review and framework of control authority transitions in automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 2015, 3:
2510–2517. [doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.513]
[55] Petermeijer SM, de Winter JCF, Bengler KJ. Vibrotactile displays: A survey with a view on highly automated driving. IEEE Trans. on
Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17(4): 897–907. [doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2494873]
[56] Borowsky A, Zangi N, Oron-Gilad T. Interruption management in the context of take-over-requests in conditional driving automation.
IEEE Trans. on Human-machine Systems, 2022, 52(5): 1015–1024. [doi: 10.1109/THMS.2022.3194006]
[57] Zeeb K, Buchner A, Schrauf M. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated
driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015, 78: 212–221. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.023]
[58] Wickens CD. Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 2008, 50(3): 449–455. [doi: 10.1518/001872008X288394]
[59] Meteier Q, Capallera M, Ruffieux S, Angelini L, Abou Khaled O, Mugellini E, Widmer M, Sonderegger A. Classification of drivers’
workload using physiological signals in conditional automation. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 596038. [doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.
596038]
[60] Kim J, Kim HS, Kim W, Yoon D. Take-over performance analysis depending on the drivers’ non-driving secondary tasks in automated
vehicles. In: Proc. of the 2018 Int’l Conf. on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). Jeju: IEEE, 2018.
1364–1366. [doi: 10.1109/ICTC.2018.8539431]
[61] Kim J, Kim HS, Kim W, Lee SJ, Yoon D. Investigation on the effect of mental workload on the time-related take-over performance. In: