Page 248 - 《高原气象》2025年第5期
P. 248
高 原 气 象 44 卷
1366
tion of turbulent exchange within plant canopies and the rough‐ budget over the Konza Prairie with a mesoscale model[J]. Agri‐
ness sublayer (CLM-ml v0)[J]. Geoscientific Model Develop‐ cultural and forest meteorology, 87(2/3): 105-118. DOI: 10.
ment, 11(4): 1467-1496. DOI: 10. 5194/gmd-11-1467-2018. 1016/S0168-1923(97)00023-3.
Burns S P, Swenson S C, Wieder W R, et al, 2018. A comparison of Stöckli R, Lawrence D M, Niu G Y, et al, 2008. Use of FLUXNET
the diel cycle of modeled and measured latent heat flux during the in the Community Land Model development[J]. Journal of Geo‐
warm season in a Colorado subalpine forest[J]. Journal of Ad‐ physical Research: Biogeosciences, 113(G1). DOI: 10. 1029/
vances in Modeling Earth Systems, 10(3): 617-651. DOI: 2007JG000562.
10. 1002/2017MS001248. Sakaguchi K, Zeng X, 2009. Effects of soil wetness, plant litter, and
Castellví F, Ali Buttar N, Hu Y, et al, 2022. Sensible heat and latent under‐canopy atmospheric stability on ground evaporation in the
heat flux estimates in a tall and dense forest canopy under unstable Community Land Model (CLM3. 5)[J]. Journal of Geophysical
conditions[J]. Atmosphere, 13(2): 264. DOI: 10. 3390/at‐ Research: Atmospheres, 114(D1). DOI: 10. 1029/2008JD0
mos13020264. 1083.
Dickinson R E, Henderson-Sellers A, Rosenzweig C, et al, 1991. Seneviratne S I, Corti T, Davin E L, et al, 2010. Investigating soil
Evapotranspiration models with canopy resistance for use in cli‐ moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review[J].
mate models, a review[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Earth-Science Reviews, 99(3/4): 125-161. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ear‐
54(2/4): 373-388. DOI: 10. 1016/0168-1923(91)90014-H. scirev. 2010. 02. 004.
Deol P, Heitman J, Amoozegar A, et al, 2012. Quantifying noniso‐ Swenson S C, Lawrence D M, 2014. Assessing a dry surface layer‐
thermal subsurface soil water evaporation[J]. Water Resources based soil resistance parameterization for the Community Land
Research, 48(11). DOI: 10. 1029/2012wr012516. Model using GRACE and FLUXNET-MTE data[J]. Journal of
Godfrey C M, Stensrud D J, 2010. An empirical latent heat flux pa‐ Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119(17): 10, 299-10,
rameterization for the Noah land surface model[J]. Journal of Ap‐ 312. DOI: 10. 1002/2014jd022314.
plied Meteorology and Climatology, 49(8): 1696-1713. DOI: Song J, Miller G R, Cahill A T, et al, 2020. Modeling land surface
10. 1175/2010JAMC2180. 1. processes over a mountainous rainforest in Costa Rica using
Ji J J, 1995. A climate-vegetation interaction model: Simulating physi‐ CLM4. 5 and CLM5[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 13
cal and biological processes at the surface[J]. Journal of Biogeog‐ (11): 5147-5173. DOI: 10. 5194/gmd-13-5147-2020.
raphy, 445-451. DOI: 10. 2307/2845941. Trenberth K E, Fasullo J T, Kiehl J, 2009. Earth's global energy bud‐
Lee T J, Pielke R A, 1992. Estimating the soil surface specific humidi‐ get[J]. Bulletin of the american meteorological society, 90(3):
ty[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 31(5): 311-324. DOI: 10. 1175/2008BAMS2634. 1.
480-484. DOI: 10. 1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0480: ETSSSH Unsworth M H, Phillips N, Link T, et al, 2004. Components and con‐
>2. 0. CO; 2. trols of water flux in an old-growth Douglas-fir-western hemlock
Lawrence P J, Chase T N, 2007. Representing a new MODIS consis‐ ecosystem[J]. Ecosystems, 7: 468-481. DOI: 10. 1007/s10021-
tent land surface in the Community Land Model (CLM 3. 0)[J]. 004-0138-3.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 112(G1). Wang S Y, Zhang Y, Lü S H, et al, 2016. Biophysical regulation of
DOI: 10. 1029/2006JG000168. carbon fluxes over an alpine meadow ecosystem in the eastern Ti‐
Oleson K W, Niu G Y, Yang Z L, et al, 2008. Improvements to the betan Plateau[J]. Int J Biometeorol. 60(6): 801-12. DOI:
Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cy‐ 10. 1007/s00484-015-1074-y.
cle[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 113 Yang M H, Zuo R T, Li X, et al, 2019. Improvement test for the can‐
(G1). DOI: 10. 1029/2007JG00056. opy interception parameterization scheme in the community land
Pan S, Tian H, Dangal S R S, et al, 2015. Responses of global terres‐ model[J]. Sola, 15: 166-171. DOI: 10. 2151/sola. 2019-030.
trial evapotranspiration to climate change and increasing atmo‐ Zhang G, Zhou G S, Chen F, et al, 2014. Analysis of the variability
spheric CO in the 21st century[J]. Earth's Future, 3(1): 15-35. of canopy resistance over a desert steppe site in Inner Mongolia,
2
DOI: 10. 1002/2014EF000263. China[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 31: 681-692.
Pascolini-Campbell M, Reager J T, Chandanpurkar H A, et al, DOI: 10. 1007/s00376-013-3071-6.
2021. RETRACTED ARTICLE: A 10 per cent increase in global 蔡福, 明惠青, 纪瑞鹏, 等, 2014. 玉米冠层辐射传输参数优化对陆
land evapotranspiration from 2003 to 2019[J]. Nature, 593 气通量模拟的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 29(5): 598-607. DOI:
(7860): 543-547. DOI: 10. 1038/s41586-021-03503-5. 10. 11867/j. issn. 1001-8166. 2014. 05. 0598. Cai F, Ming H Q,
Sellers P J, Heiser M D, Hall F G, 1992. Relations between surface Ji R P, et al, 2014. Effects of maize canopy radiative transfer pa‐
conductance and spectral vegetation indices at intermediate (100 rameters optimization on simulating land-atmosphere flux ex‐
2
2
m to 15 km ) length scales[J]. Journal of Geophysical Re‐ changes[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 29(5): 598-607. DOI:
search: Atmospheres, 97(D17): 19033-19059. DOI: 10. 1029/ 10. 11867/j. issn. 1001-8166. 2014. 05. 0598.
92jd01096. 常娜, 李茂善, 王灵芝, 等, 2022. 峨眉山地区近地层微气象特征研
Song J, Willmott C J, Hanson B, 1997. Simulating the surface energy 究[J]. 高原气象, 41(1): 226-240. DOI: 10. 7522/j. issn. 1000-

