Page 168 - 《爆炸与冲击》2026年第9期

第 46 卷 梁 霄，等： 基于流形上概率学习的PBX9502冲击起爆试验不确定度量化 第 9 期

参考文献：

[1] 孙承纬, 卫玉章, 周之奎. 应用爆轰物理 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2000.
SUN C W, WEI Y Z, ZHOU Z K. Applied detonation physics [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2000.
[2] FICKETT W, DAVIS W C. Detonation: theory and experiment [M]. New York: Dover Publication, 2011.
[3] LIANG X, WANG R, GHANEM R. Uncertainty quantification of detonation through adapted polynomial chaos [J].
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 2020, 10(1): 83–100. DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.
2020030630.
[4] 梁霄, 王瑞利. 基于冲击 Hugoniot 关系的爆压性质和不确定度量化 [J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(5): 1673–1680. DOI: 10.12382/
bgxb.2022.1207.
LIANG X, WANG R L. Property and uncertainty quantification of detonation pressure based on shock Hugoniot relationship [J].
Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(5): 1673–1680. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.1207.
[5] LIANG X, WANG R L. Verification and validation of detonation modeling [J]. Defence Technology, 2019, 15(3): 398–408.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2018.11.005.
[6] 梁霄, 王瑞利. 爆轰流体力学模型敏感度分析与模型确认 [J]. 物理学报, 2017, 66(11): 116401. DOI: 10.7498/aps.
66.116401.
LIANG X, WANG R L. Sensitivity analysis and validation of detonation computational fluid dynamics model [J]. Acta
Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(11): 116401. DOI: 10.7498/aps.66.116401.
[7] WESCOTT B L, STEWART D S, DAVIS W C. Equation of state and reaction rate for condensed-phase explosives [J].
Journal of Applied Physics, 2005, 98(5): 053514. DOI: 10.1063/1.2035310.
[8] CAMPBELL A W. Diameter effect and failure diameter of a TATB-based explosive [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics,
1984, 9(6): 183–187. DOI: 10.1002/prep.19840090602.
[9] PETERSON P D, IDAR D J. Microstructural differences between virgin and recycled lots of PBX 9502 [J]. Propellants,
Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2005, 30(2): 88–94. DOI: 10.1002/prep.200400088.
[10] HANDLEY C A, LAMBOURN B D, WHITWORTH N J, et al. Understanding the shock and detonation response of high
explosives at the continuum and meso scales [J]. Applied Physics Reviews, 2018, 5(1): 011303. DOI: 10.1063/1.5005997.
[11] GUSTAVSEN R L, SHEFFIELD S A, ALCON R R. Measurements of shock initiation in the tri-amino-tri-nitro-benzene
based explosive PBX 9502: wave forms from embedded gauges and comparison of four different material lots [J]. Journal of
Applied Physics, 2006, 99(11): 114907. DOI: 10.1063/1.2195191.
[12] PARK C, NILI S, MATHEW J T, et al. Uncertainty reduction for model error detection in multiphase shock tube simulation [J].
Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, 2021, 6(3): 031004. DOI: 10.1115/1.4051407.
[13] LINDQUIST B A, JADRICH R B, RIVERA J E H, et al. Uncertainty quantification for high explosive reactant and product
equations of state [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2023, 134(7): 075102. DOI: 10.1063/5.0157842.
[14] ANDREWS S A, LEIDING J A, THRUSSELL J, et al. Calibration and uncertainty quantification for Davis Equation of State
Models for the High Explosive PBX 9501 products [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2024, 49(2): e202300110. DOI:
10.1002/prep.202300110.
[15] NELMS M, SCHILL W, WILLIAM KUO I F, et al. Uncertainty quantification of material parameters in modeling coupled
metal and high explosive experiments [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2024, 136(19): 195101. DOI: 10.1063/5.0226642.
[16] ANDREWS S A, FRASER A M. Estimating physics models and quantifying their uncertainty using optimization with a
Bayesian objective function [J]. Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, 2019, 4(1): 011002. DOI:
10.1115/1.4043807.
[17] GARNO J, OUELLET F, BAE S, et al. Calibration of reactive burn and Jones-Wilkins-Lee parameters for simulations of a
detonation-driven flow experiment with uncertainty quantification [J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(12): 123201. DOI:
10.1103/physrevfluids.5.123201.
[18] 戴诚达, 王翔, 谭华. Hugoniot 实验的粒子速度测量不确定度分析 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2005, 19(2): 113–119. DOI:
10.11858/gywlxb.2005.02.003.

094102-9