Page 321 - 《水产学报》2026年第04期
P. 321

4 期        李少文,等:基于       3  种权重方案的近海渔业资源配额比例研究——以山东省沿海                    7  市为例        50 卷

                    tional comparison[J]. The Economic Journal, 1977, 87(345): 71-  44: 3-8.
                    80.                                       [34]   Bellanger  M,  Macher  C,  Guyader  O.  A  new  approach  to
              [23]   吴立军, 汪前元, 田启波. 全球碳排放权分配与减排分担研究                 determine  the  distributional  effects  of  quota  management  in
                    ——基于环境约束与公平感受的视角          [J]. 中国环境管理,          fisheries[J]. Fisheries Research, 2016, 181: 116-126.
                    2021, 13(4): 100-110.                     [35]   McClanahan  T  R,  Maina  J  M,  Muthiga  N  A.  Associations
                    Wu L J, Wang Q Y, Tian Q B. Research on global carbon emis-  between climate stress and coral reef diversity in the Western
                    sion rights allocation and emission reduction sharing——based  Indian  Ocean[J].  Global  Change  Biology,  2011,  17(6):  2023-
                    on the perspective of environmental constraints and perceived  2032.
                    fairness[J].  Environmental  Conformity  Assessment,  2021,  [36]   Lynham  J.  How  have  catch  shares  been  allocated?[J].  Marine
                    13(4): 100-110 (in Chinese).                    Policy, 2014, 44: 42-48.
              [24]   Sun T, Zhang H W, Wang Y. The application of information  [37]   Seto K, Galland G R, McDonald A, et al. Resource allocation in
                    entropy  in  basin  level  water  waste  permits  allocation  in  transboundary tuna fisheries: a global analysis[J]. Ambio, 2021,
                    China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2013, 70: 50-  50(1): 242-259.
                    54.                                       [38]   Sanchirico J N, Holland D, Quigley K, et al. Catch-quota balan-
              [25]   Zhang Y J, Wang A D, Da Y B. Regional allocation of carbon  cing in multispecies individual fishing quotas[J]. Marine Policy,
                    emission  quotas  in  China:  evidence  from  the  Shapley  value  2006, 30(6): 767-785.
                    method[J]. Energy Policy, 2014, 74: 454-464.  [39]   Villasante S, Do Carme García-Negro M, González-Laxe F, et
              [26]   Cheng K, Fu Q, Chen X, et al. Adaptive allocation modeling for  al. Overfishing and the common fisheries policy: (un)success-
                    a complex system of regional water and land resources based on  ful results from TAC regulation?[J]. Fish and Fisheries, 2011,
                    information  entropy  and  its  application[J].  Water  Resources  12(1): 34-50.
                    Management, 2015, 29(14): 4977-4993.      [40]   蒋慧颖. 住房财富对城镇居民消费不平等的影响研究         [D]. 南
              [27]   Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The  京: 南京信息工程大学, 2024.
                    Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(4): 623-656.  Jiang H Y. Research on the impact of housing wealth on con-
              [28]   Yuan Q, McIntyre N, Wu Y P, et al. Towards greater socio-eco-  sumption  inequality  among  urban  residents[D].  Nanjing:
                    nomic equality in allocation of wastewater discharge permits in  Nanjing  University  of  Information  Science  and  Technology,
                    China  based  on  the  weighted  Gini  coefficient[J].  Resources,  2024 (in Chinese).
                    Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 127: 196-205.  [41]   黄金玲, 黄硕琳. 关于我国专属经济区内实施限额捕捞制度
              [29]   Ma G, Li X, Zheng J P. Efficiency and equity in regional coal  存在问题的探讨  [J]. 现代渔业信息, 2002, 17(11): 3-6.
                    de-capacity allocation in China: a multiple objective program-  Huang J L, Huang S L. A study on feasibility of implementing
                    ming  model  based  on  Gini  coefficient  and  data  envelopment  total  allowable  catch  in  Chinese  EEZ[J].  Modern  Fisheries
                    analysis[J]. Resources Policy, 2020, 66: 101621.  Information, 2002, 17(11): 3-6 (in Chinese).
              [30]   He W J, Zhang B. A comparative analysis of Chinese provin-  [42]   黄金玲, 黄硕琳. 总可捕量制度在我国的可行性分析  [J]. 上
                    cial carbon dioxide emissions allowances allocation schemes in  海水产大学学报, 2002, 11(4): 342-347.
                    2030: an egalitarian perspective[J]. Science of the Total Envir-  Huang J L, Huang S L. Analyses on feasibility of implement-
                    onment, 2021, 765: 142705.                      ing  total  allowable  catch  in  Chinese  fisheries[J].  Journal  of
              [31]   Kong Y C, Zhao T, Yuan R, et al. Allocation of carbon emis-  Shanghai  Fisheries  University,  2002,  11(4):  342-347  (in
                    sion quotas  in  Chinese  provinces  based  on  equality  and   effi-  Chinese).
                    ciency principles[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 211:  [43]   全 国 人 大 常 委 会 .  中 华 人 民 共 和 国 渔 业 法  (2000  年 修
                    222-232.                                        正 )[EB/OL].  (2000-10-31)[2025-10-02].  https://jjjcz.mee.gov.
              [32]   Plummer M L, Morrison W E, Steiner E M. Allocation of fish-  cn/djfg/gjflfg/fl/200010/t20001001_444249.html.
                    ery harvests under the Magnuson-Stevens fishery conservation  Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. Fishery
                    and management act: principles and practice[R]. Seattle: North-  law  of  the  People’s  Republic  of  China  (Amended  in  2000)
                    west Fisheries Science Center, 2012.            [EB/OL].  (2000-10-31)[2025-10-02].  https://jjjcz.mee.gov.cn/
              [33]   Severance  C.  Sharing  the  catch  or  catching  the  shares:  catch  djfg/gjflfg/fl/200010/t20001001_444249.html (in Chinese).
                    shares for the Western Pacific region?[J]. Marine Policy, 2014,  [44]   张健, 包特力根白乙. 我国实施  Tac 制度面临的问题及政策

              中国水产学会主办  sponsored by China Society of Fisheries                          https://www.china-fishery.cn
                                                            9
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326