Page 230 - 《水产学报》2025年第8期
P. 230

何妤如                                                                   水产学报, 2025, 49(8): 089319

              development  has  been  the  expansion  of  EEZs,  international seabed area. Regionally, a scaled gov-
              enabling coastal States to upscale their sovereignty  ernance  structure  emerges.  At  the  meso  scale,
                                 [17]
              rights and expression . From the establishment of  regional  sea  organizations  (RSOs,  which  typically
              RFMOs  with  regulatory  authority  over  fishing  ac-  operate under  distinct  mandates  from  their   corres-
              tivities, to the Agreement on the Conservation and  ponding RFMOs, though the CCAMLR plays a dual
              Sustainable  Use  of  Marine  Biological  Diversity  of  role as  both  an  RSO  and  RFMO)  handle   environ-
              Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ Agree-  mental protection, RFMOs focus on fisheries man-
              ment)  newly-adopted  in  2023,  the  legal  scale  of  agement through multilateral agreements, and sub-
              “freedom  of  the  high  seas”  has  been  continuously  regional bodies like the Pacific Island Forum Fish-
              adjusted. The further designation and governance of  eries Agency (FFA) facilitate tailored, cross-border
              marine protected areas (MPAs) will introduce addi-  governance  solutions.  At  the  micro  level,  scale-
              tional spatial constraints. This development of legal  sensitive approaches  have  been  adopted,  as   exem-
              instruments indicates how fisheries actors strategic-  plified in the U.S. system’s jurisdictional division at
              ally negotiate power relations through legal-spatial  3 nautical miles and subsequent partitioning of fed-
              adjustments  by  constructing,  manipulating,  and  eral  waters  into  eight  fishery-specific  management
              reshaping scales, continuously reconfiguring power  zones.  This  multi-scalar  architecture  continues  to
              dynamics within evolving spatial boundaries.     evolve through dynamic recalibration, reflecting the
                   Contemporary  marine  fisheries  governance  complex spatial  realities  of  marine  resource   gov-
              functions through a spatial hierarchy that integrates  ernance.

              scientific knowledge, institutional adaptability, and
                                                               2    RFMOS AS ECO-SCALAR FIX
              multi-stakeholder collaboration  to  reconcile   ecolo-

              gical sustainability with management effectiveness.
                                                               2.1    Institutional scaling
              The ecosystem-based management (EBM) approach
              has become the prevailing framework to coordinate    The  globalization  of  fishing  effort  triggers
              the regulation  of  marine  ecosystems  across   biolo-  transformative  spatial  effects,  intensifying  internal
              gical,  habitat,  and  anthropogenic  dimensions  by  conflicts while also fostering alliances among spe-
              urging the translation of global norms into regional  cific actors. The concern of overfishing has shifted
              action plans  and  embedding  them  into  local   com-  international  fisheries  governance  priorities  from
              munity co-governance through national legislation.  mediating competing national fishing efforts before
              At  the  macro  scale,  the  Food  and  Agriculture  19th century, to current sustainable harvesting prac-
              Organization  of  the  United  States  (FAO)  divides  tices and marine conservation. Within this dynamic
              global oceans into 19 Major Fishing Areas, provid-  governance  architecture,  scale  operates  as  both  a
              ing a spatial benchmark for the collection of fisher-  multidimensional construct that facilitates the nego-
              ies statistics, resource management and reporting on  tiations of authority across global, regional, subre-
              global marine catch data. The Large Marine Ecosys-  gional  and  national  levels,  and  a  contested  space
              tem  (LME)  approach,  a  crucial  tool  for  coastal  where  diverse  stakeholders  strategically  position
              resource  assessment,  divides  waters  from  river  themselves  to  secure  resource  access,  regulatory
                                                                                                [19]
              basins  and  estuaries  to  continental  shelf  margins  dominance, and institutional legitimacy .
              and  major  current  systems  into  66  units  covering  In order to better harness the growing human-
                                                        [18]
              approximately  80%  of  global  fisheries  biomass .  ity capacity  for  shared  marine  resources   exploita-
              The BBNJ Agreement potentially creates an integ-  tion,  stakeholders  utilize  different  environmental
              rated  system  of  area-based  management  tools  impact assessment criteria and establish varied reg-
              (ABMTs)  to  cover  high  seas  protected  areas  and  ulatory  frameworks,  such  as  RFMOs,  RSOs  and

              https://www.china-fishery.cn                           中国水产学会主办    sponsored by China Society of Fisheries
                                                            4
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235