Page 55 - 《软件学报》2025年第12期

5436 软件学报 2025 年第 36 卷第 12 期

[20] Du N, Zhou F, Tilbury DM, Robert LP, Yang XJ. Behavioral and physiological responses to takeovers in different scenarios during
conditionally automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2024, 101: 320–331. [doi: 10.1016/j.
trf.2024.01.008]
[21] Koochaki F, Zheng ZK, Akash K, Misu T. Learn-able evolution convolutional Siamese neural network for adaptive driving style
preference prediction. In: Proc. of the 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV). Anchorage: IEEE, 2023. 1–7. [doi: 10.1109/IV55152.
2023.10186593]
[22] Gold C, Happee R, Bengler K. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. Accident Analysis &
Prevention, 2018, 116: 3–13. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.009]
[23] Ma S, Zhang W, Yang Z, Kang CY, Wu CX, Chai CL, Shi JL, Zeng YL, Li HT. Take over gradually in conditional automated driving:
The effect of two-stage warning systems on situation awareness, driving stress, takeover performance, and acceptance. Int’l Journal of
Human-computer Interaction, 2021, 37(4): 352–362. [doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1860514]
[24] Ayoub J, Du N, Yang XJ, Zhou F. Predicting driver takeover time in conditionally automated driving. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent
Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(7): 9580–9589. [doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3154329]
[25] Pakdamanian E, Sheng SL, Baee S, Heo S, Kraus S, Feng L. DeepTake: Prediction of driver takeover behavior using multimodal data. In:
Proc. of the 2021 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Yokohama: ACM, 2021. 103. [doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445563]
[26] Sajedinia Z, Akash K, Zheng ZB, Misu T, Dong MM, Krishnamoorthy V, Martinez K, Sureshbabu K, Huang GJ. Investigating users’
preferences in adaptive driving styles for level 2 driving automation. In: Proc. of the 14th Int’l Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and
Interactive Vehicular Applications. Seoul: ACM, 2022. 162–170. [doi: 10.1145/3543174.3546088]
[27] Zhu JY, Ma YL, Zhang YR, Zhang YP, Lv C. Takeover quality prediction based on driver physiological state of different cognitive tasks
in conditionally automated driving. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2023, 57: 102100. [doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102100]
[28] Chen HL, Zhao XH, Li HJ, Gong JG, Fu Q. Predicting driver’s takeover time based on individual characteristics, external environment,
and situation awareness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 203: 107601. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107601]
[29] Gu Y, Weng YB, Wang YT, Wang M, Zhuang GH, Huang JY, Peng XL, Luo L, Ren FJ. EmoTake: Exploring drivers’ emotion for
takeover behavior prediction. IEEE Trans. on Affective Computing, 2024, 15(4): 2112–2127. [doi: 10.1109/TAFFC.2024.3399328]
[30] Li RJ, Qin TH, Widdershoven C. ISS-Scenario: Scenario-based testing in CARLA. In: Proc. of the 18th Int’l Symp. on Theoretical
Aspects of Software Engineering. Guiyang: Springer, 2024. 279–286. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-64626-3_16]
[31] Najm WG, Smith JD, Yanagisawa M. Pre-crash scenario typology for crash avoidance research. National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 2007.
[32] State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of China. GB/T 41798-2022 Intelligent and connected
vehicles—Track testing methods and requirements for automated driving functions. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2022. 36. (in Chinese)
[33] ISO. ISO 34504: 2024 Road vehicles—Test scenarios for automated driving systems—Scenario categorization. Geneva: ISO, 2024.
[34] Alrefaie MT, Summerskill S, Jackon TW. In a heart beat: Using driver’s physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in
highly automated vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2019, 131: 180–190. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.011]
[35] Radhakrishnan V, Merat N, Louw T, Gonçalves RC, Torrao G, Lyu W, Guillen PP, Lenné MG. Physiological indicators of driver
workload during car-following scenarios and takeovers in highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology
and Behaviour, 2022, 87: 149–163. [doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.04.002]
[36] Massaro S, Pecchia L. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis: A methodology for organizational neuroscience. Organizational Research
Methods, 2019, 22(1): 354–393. [doi: 10.1177/1094428116681072]
[37] Zhou F, Yang XJ, De Winter JCF. Using eye-tracking data to predict situation awareness in real time during takeover transitions in
conditionally automated driving. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(3): 2284–2295. [doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.
3069776]
[38] Liu P, Zhang YW, He Z. The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles. Reliability Engineering & System
Safety, 2019, 185: 341–347. [doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.003]
[39] Siegfried AL, Bayne A, Beck LF, Freund K. Older adult willingness to use fully autonomous vehicle (FAV) ride sharing. Geriatrics,
2021, 6(2): 47. [doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6020047]
[40] Abraham H, Lee C, Brady S, Fitzgerald C, Mehler B, Reimer B, Coughlin JF. Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: Trust,
preferences, and effects of age. In: Proc. of the 96th Annual Meeting on Transportation Research Board. Washington: Transportation
Research Board, 2017. 8–12.
[41] Eriksson A, Stanton NA. Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human Factors,
2017, 59(4): 689–705. [doi: 10.1177/0018720816685832]