Page 54 - 《软件学报》2025年第12期
P. 54

张杨杨 等: 典型驾驶场景下接管绩效预测及特征分析                                                       5435


                 略不仅提升了模型的可信度, 还为理解自动驾驶接管过程中的关键影响因素提供了宝贵的洞见, 为未来的人机交
                 互设计和自动驾驶系统的安全性优化奠定了坚实的理论与实证基础.

                 References:
                  [1]   Biondi F, Alvarez I, Jeong KA. Human-vehicle cooperation in automated driving: A multidisciplinary review and appraisal. Int’l Journal
                     of Human-computer Interaction, 2019, 35(11): 932–946. [doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1561792]
                  [2]   SAE. J3016_201401 Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE, 2014. 1.
                  [3]   Dogan  E,  Honnêt  V,  Masfrand  S,  Guillaume  A.  Effects  of  non-driving-related  tasks  on  takeover  performance  in  different  takeover
                     situations in conditionally automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 62: 494–504.
                     [doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.010]
                  [4]   So JJ, Park S, Kim J, Park J, Yun I. Investigating the impacts of road traffic conditions and driver’s characteristics on automated vehicle
                     takeover time and quality using a driving simulator. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2021(1): 8859553. [doi: 10.1155/2021/
                     8859553]
                  [5]   Kim  JW,  Yang  JH.  Understanding  metrics  of  vehicle  control  take-over  requests  in  simulated  automated  vehicles.  Int’l  Journal  of
                     Automotive Technology, 2020, 21(3): 757–770. [doi: 10.1007/s12239-020-0074-z]
                  [6]   Soares S, Lobo A, Ferreira S, Cunha L, Couto A. Takeover performance evaluation using driving simulation: A systematic review and
                     meta-analysis. European Transport Research Review, 2021, 13(1): 47. [doi: 10.1186/s12544-021-00505-2]
                  [7]   Yoon SH, Kim YW, Ji YG, Prevention. The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions. Accident
                     Analysis & Prevention, 2019, 123: 150–158. [doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.018]
                  [8]   DeGuzman CA, Kanaan D, Hopkins SA, Donmez B. Takeover request (TOR) effects during different automated vehicle failures. Journal
                     of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021: 1–31. [doi: 10.1080/15472450.2021.1891536]
                  [9]   Deng HW, Xiang GL, Pan JD, Wu XH, Fan CJ, Wang K, Peng Y. How to design driver takeover request in real-world scenarios: A
                     systematic review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2024, 104: 411–432. [doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.06.
                     012]
                 [10]   Liu WM, Li QK, Wang WJ, Wang ZY, Zeng C, Cheng B. Deep learning based take-over performance prediction and its application on
                     intelligent vehicles. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024: 1–15. [doi: 10.1109/TIV.2024.3374528]
                 [11]   Dosovitskiy A, Ros G, Codevilla F, López AM, Koltun V. CARLA: An open urban driving simulator. In: Proc. of the 1st Annual Conf.
                     on Robot Learning. Mountain View: CoRL, 2017. 1–16.
                 [12]   Cao  YN,  Zhou  F,  Pulver  EM,  Molnar  LJ,  Robert  LP,  Tilbury  DM,  Yang  XJ.  Towards  standardized  metrics  for  measuring  takeover
                     performance  in  conditionally  automated  driving:  A  systematic  review.  Proc.  of  the  Human  Factors  and  Ergonomics  Society  Annual
                     Meeting, 2021, 65(1): 1065–1069. [doi: 10.1177/1071181321651213]
                 [13]   McDonald AD, Alambeigi H, Engström J, Markkula G, Vogelpohl T, Dunne J, Yuma N. Toward computational simulations of behavior
                     during automated driving takeovers: A review of the empirical and modeling literatures. Human Factors, 2019, 61(4): 642–688. [doi: 10.
                     1177/0018720819829572]
                 [14]   Gold C, Damböck D, Lorenz L, Bengler K. “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In: Proc. of the 57th
                     Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2013. 1938–1942.
                 [15]   Chen QX, Li JL, Tei KJ. Attention-guiding takeover requests for situation awareness in semi-autonomous driving. In: Proc. of the 2023
                     Companion of ACM/IEEE Int’l Conf. on Human-robot Interaction. Stockholm: ACM, 2023. 416–421. [doi: 10.1145/3568294.3580118]
                 [16]   Heo J, Lee H, Yoon S, Kim K. Responses to take-over request in autonomous vehicles: Effects of environmental conditions and cues.
                     IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(12): 23573–23582. [doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3201074]
                 [17]   Meteier Q, Capallera M, De Salis E, Angelini L, Carrino S, Abou Khaled O, Mugellini E, Sonderegger A. Effect of obstacle type and
                     cognitive  task  on  situation  awareness  and  takeover  performance  in  conditionally  automated  driving.  In:  Proc.  of  the  34th  Conf.  on
                     l’Interaction Humain-machine. TROYES: ACM, 2023. 5. [doi: 10.1145/3583961.3583966]
                 [18]   Hong S, Maeng J, Kim HJ, Yang JH. Development of warning methods for planned and unplanned takeover requests in a simulated
                     automated driving vehicle. In: Proc. of the 14th Int’l Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Seoul:
                     ACM, 2022. 65–74. [doi: 10.1145/3543174.3545999]
                 [19]   Sanghavi H, Zhang YQ, Jeon M. Exploring the influence of driver affective state and auditory display urgency on takeover performance
                     in semi-automated vehicles: Experiment and modelling. Int’l Journal of Human-computer Studies, 2023, 171: 102979. [doi: 10.1016/j.
                     ijhcs.2022.102979]
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59