Page 367 - 《软件学报》2021年第12期

张云鹏 等:邻中心迭代策略的单标注视频行人重识别 4031

Table 1 Comparison of center selection method correct rate
表 1 中心选取方式正确率的对比区性 (%)
DukeMTMC-VideoReID MARS
Parameter Mean Median Mean Median
p=0.30 64.26 61.04 41.94 42.58
p=0.20 68.14 67.47 47.36 48.40
p=0.15 68.61 68.61 56.30 54.36
p=0.10 73.23 72.36 60.58 63.01
p=0.05 75.30 74.50 66.56 68.19

Table 2 Comparison of NCI and EUG results
表 2 NCI 与 EUG 结果对比 (%)
DukeMTMC-VideoReID MARS
Methods rank-1 rank-5 rank-20 mAP rank-1 rank-5 rank-20 mAP
[9]
EUG (p=0.30) 63.82 78.64 87.04 54.57 42.77 56.51 67.17 21.12
[9]
EUG (p=0.20) 68.95 81.05 89.46 59.50 48.68 63.38 72.57 26.55
[9]
EUG (p=0.15) 69.08 81.19 88.88 59.21 52.32 64.29 73.08 29.56
[9]
EUG (p=0.10) 70.79 83.61 89.60 61.76 57.62 69.64 78.08 34.68
[9]
EUG (p=0.05) 72.79 84.18 91.45 63.23 62.67 74.94 82.57 42.45
NCI (p=0.30) 67.50 79.20 87.90 58.10 44.30 57.90 67.70 22.40
NCI (p=0.20) 71.20 83.80 91.00 62.80 47.70 60.80 70.00 26.40
NCI (p=0.15) 71.50 84.30 89.90 62.20 55.50 69.50 77.80 34.30
NCI (p=0.10) 73.40 86.80 93.20 65.60 60.40 76.00 84.30 40.80
NCI (p=0.05) 74.40 88.50 93.40 66.40 64.60 78.10 84.40 45.80

抽取样本比例(%) 抽取样本比例(%)

抽取样本比例(%)
Fig.4 Results of different values of parameter p on the MARS dataset
图 4 参数 p 不同值在 MARS 数据集上的结果图