Page 144 - 《摩擦学学报》2020年第6期

第 6 期 彭宪宇, 等: 海洋生物水下粘附机理及仿生研究 827

Materials, 2017, 5(11): 116102. doi: 10.1063/1.4985756. rosa[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1996, 199(10):
[ 10 ] Yu J. Adhesive interactions of mussel foot proteins[M]. Berlin: 2131–2137. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e328353be71.
Springer, 2014. [ 24 ] Suzuki R, Mori Y, Kamino K, et al. NMR assignment of the
[ 11 ] Zhang Hui, Cao Wenhao, Huang Li, et al. Characteristics of barnacle cement protein Mrcp-20k[J]. Journal of Biomolecular
barnacle glue and its mechanism of action[J]. Materials Review, Nmr, 2005, 32(3): 257–257. doi: 10.1007/s10858-005-7029-6.
2014, 28(5): 108–111 (in Chinese) [张慧, 曹文浩, 黄立, 等. 藤壶 [ 25 ] Kamino K, Odo S, Maruyama T. Cement proteins of the acorn-
胶的特性及其作用机理[J]. 材料导报, 2014, 28(5): 108–111]. barnacle, Megabalanus rosa[J]. The Biological Bulletin, 1996,
[ 12 ] Waite J H, Tanzer M L. Polyphenolic substance of mytilus edulis: 190(3): 403–409. doi: 10.2307/1543033.
Novel adhesive containing L-dopa and hydroxyproline[J]. Science, [ 26 ] Kamino K. Mini-review: Barnacle adhesives and adhesion[J].
1981, 212(4498): 1038–1040. doi: 10.1126/science.212.4498.1038. Biofouling, 2013, 29(6): 735–749. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2013.
[ 13 ] Kim S, Faghihnejad A, Lee Y, et al. Cation-π interaction in DOPA- 800863.
deficient mussel adhesive protein mfp-1[J]. Journal of Materials [ 27 ] Stevens M J, Steren R E, Hlady V, et al. Multiscale structure of the
Chemistry B, 2015, 3(5): 738–743. doi: 10.1039/C4TB01646G. underwater adhesive of phragmatopoma californica: A
[ 14 ] Wilker J J. Positive charges and underwater adhesion[J]. Science, nanostructured latex with a steep microporosity gradient[J].
2015, 349(6248): 582–583. doi: 10.1126/science.aac8174. Langmuir, 2007, 23(9): 5045–5049. doi: 10.1021/la063765e.
[ 15 ] Rapp M V, Maier G P, Dobbs H A, et al. Defining the catechol- [ 28 ] Wang C S, Svendsen K K, Stewart R J. Morphology of the
cation synergy for enhanced wet adhesion to mineral surfaces[J]. adhesive system in the sandcastle worm, Phragmatopoma
Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(29): californica[M]. Vienna: Springer, 2011.
9013–9016. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03453. [ 29 ] Wang C S, Stewart R J. Localization of the bioadhesive precursors
[ 16 ] Maier G P, Rapp M V, Waite J H, et al. Adaptive synergy between of the sandcastle worm, Phragmatopoma californica (Fewkes)[J].
catechol and lysine promotes wet adhesion by surface salt Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012, 215(2): 351–361. doi:
displacement[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6248): 628–632. doi: 10.1126/ 10.1242/jeb.065011.
science.aab0556. [ 30 ] Becker P T, Lambert A, Lejeune A, et al. Identification,
[ 17 ] Xu Q, Xu M, Lin C Y, et al. Metal coordination‐ mediated characterization, and expression levels of putative adhesive
functional grading and self‐ healing in mussel byssus cuticle[J]. proteins from the tube-dwelling polychaete sabellaria alveolata[J].
Advanced Science, 2019, 6(23): 1902043. doi: 10.1002/advs. The Biological Bulletin, 2012, 223(2): 217–225. doi: 10.1086/
201902043. BBLv223n2p217.
[ 18 ] Yan Wenxia, Dong Yu, Yin Fen. Comparison of primary and [ 31 ] Peng Hongwei. High-performance hydrogel constructed by
secondary glue of reticulated barnacle[J]. Journal of Tropical mimicking marine bioadhesin[D]. Shanghai: East China University
Ocean, 1983(3): 61–67 (in Chinese) [严文侠, 董钰, 尹芬. 网纹藤 of Science and Technology, 2019(in Chinese) [彭宏伟. 仿海洋生
壶初生胶和次生胶比较[J]. 热带海洋学报, 1983(3): 61–67]. 物粘附蛋白构筑的高性能水凝胶[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学,
[ 19 ] Chen Z F, Matsumura K, Wang H, et al. Toward an understanding 2019].
of the molecular mechanisms of barnacle larval settlement: A [ 32 ] Zhao H, Sun C, Stewart R J, et al. Cement proteins of the tube-
comparative transcriptomic approach[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(7): building polychaete phragmatopoma californica[J]. Journal of
e22913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022913. Biological Chemistry, 2005, 280(52): 42938–42944. doi: 10.1074/
[ 20 ] Zhang Xinkang, Liu Xingping, Zeng Ling, et al. Barnacle jbc.M508457200.
adhesion: From substrate detection to cement curing[J]. Progress in [ 33 ] Endrizzi B J, Stewart R J. Glueomics: An expression survey of the
Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2017, 44(3): 204–214 (in Chinese) adhesive gland of the sandcastle worm[J]. The Journal of
[张欣康, 刘兴平, 曾玲, 等. 藤壶附着: 从基底探测到胶的固化 Adhesion, 2009, 85(8): 546–559. doi: 10.1080/002184609029964
[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2017, 44(3): 204–214]. 57.
[ 21 ] Sangeetha R, Kumar R, Venkatesan R, et al. Understanding the [ 34 ] Wang C S, Stewart R J. Multipart copolyelectrolyte adhesive of the
structure of the adhesive plaque of amphibalanus reticulatus[J]. sandcastle worm, Phragmatopoma californica (Fewkes): Catechol
Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2010, 30(1): 112–119. doi: oxidase catalyzed curing through peptidyl-DOPA[J].
10.1016/j.msec.2009.09.007. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14(5): 1607–1617. doi:
[ 22 ] Kamino K. Molecular design of barnacle cement in comparison 10.1021/bm400251k.
with those of mussel and tubeworm[J]. The Journal of Adhesion, [ 35 ] Stewart R J, Weaver J C, Morse D E, et al. The tube cement of
2010, 86(1): 96–110. doi: 10.1080/00218460903418139. phragmatopoma californica: A solid foam[J]. Journal of
[ 23 ] Okano K, Shimizu K, Satuito C, et al. Visualization of cement Experimental Biology, 2004, 207(26): 4727–4734. doi: 10.1242/
exocytosis in the cypris cement gland of the barnacle megabalanus jeb.01330.