Page 293 - 《振动工程学报》2025年第8期
P. 293

第 8 期                 孟思博,等: 近断层峡谷场地深水刚构桥地震响应参数敏感性研究                                      1933

                  [J].  Journal  of  Vibration  and  Shock,  2023,  42(1):  734‑752.
                   146‑159.                                          GAO Yufeng, DAI Denghui, ZHANG Ning. Progress
             [7] 江辉,楚芹,王宝喜 . 近、远场地震下深水桥墩动力响应                         and prospect of topographic amplification effects of seis‑
                   特性对比研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2014,33(22):58‑66.               mic wave in canyon sites[J]. Journal of Disaster Preven‑

                   JIANG  Hui,  CHU  Qin,  WANG  Baoxi.  Comparative   tion and Mitigation Engineering, 2021, 41(4): 734‑752.
                   study on the dynamic response feature of bridge pier in   [16] LI  S,  ZHANG  F,  WANG  M  D,  et  al.  Seismic  re‑
                   deep‑water excited by near‑fault and far‑field earthquake   sponse sensitivity of a V‑shaped canyon‑crossing bridge
                   ground  motions[J].  Journal  of  Vibration  and  Shock,   considering  the  near‑source  canyon  topographic  effects
                   2014, 33(22): 58‑66.                             [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022,
             [8] ZHANG  J  R,  WEI  K,  QIN  J  X.  Resilience  and  eco‑  155: 107205.
                   nomic loss assessment of highway bridges in deep reser‑  [17] OZSARAC V, MONETIRO R, CALVI G M. Proba‑
                   voir  under  near‑fault  ground  motions[J].  Journal  of   bilistic  seismic  assessment  of  reinforced  concrete  bridg‑
                   Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(3): 04021007.        es using simulated records[J]. Structure and Infrastruc‑
             [9] 吴堃, 马杰, 苏俊省,等 . 考虑局部场地效应的深水多                        ture Engineering, 2023, 19(4): 554‑574.
                   跨连续梁桥纵桥向地震响应分析[J]. 振动工程学报,                   [18] SPMALA S N, REDDY K S K K, MANGALATHU
                   2025,38(1): 154‑161.                              S.  The  effect  of  rupture  directivity,  distance  and  skew
                   WU  Kun,  MA  Jie,  SU  Junxing,  et  al.  Longitudinal   angle on the collapse fragilities of bridges[J]. Bulletin of
                   seismic response analysis of multi‑span continuous gird‑  Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19(14): 5843‑5869.
                   er bridges considering local site effects[J]. Journal of Vi‑  [19] BERESNEV  I  A,  ATKINSON  G  M.  Modeling
                   bration Engineering, 2025,38(1): 154‑161.         finite‑fault  radiation  from  the  ωn  spectrum[J].  Bulletin
             [10] 李帅,张凡,颜晓伟,等.近断层地震动合成方法及其                           of the Seismological Society of America, 1997, 87(1):
                   对超大跨斜拉桥地震响应影响[J].中国公路学报,                          67‑84.
                   2017,30(2):86‑97.                            [20] 吴文朋, 李立峰, 唐盛华, 等 . 桥梁地震需求分析中建
                   LI Shuai, ZHANG Fan, YAN Xiaowei, et al. Synthetic   模不确定性的敏感性研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37
                   method for near‑fault ground motions and its influence on   (24): 257‑264.
                   seismic  response  of  super‑span  cable‑stayed  bridge[J].   WU  Wenpeng,  LI  Lifeng,  TANG  Shenghua,  et  al.
                   China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(2):   Sensitivity investigation of modeling uncertainty for seis‑
                   86‑97.                                            mic demand analysis of bridges[J]. Journal of Vibration
             [11] 李宁,刁泽民,李忠献 . 考虑震源和场地特征的近断层                         and Shock, 2018, 37(24): 257‑264.
                   地区竖向地震动合成研究[J]. 工程力学,2022,39(6):             [21] BOORE  D  M.  Stochastic  simulation  of  high‑frequency
                   181‑190.                                          ground motions based on seismological models of the ra‑
                   LI  Ning,  DIAO  Zemin,  LI  Zhongxian.  Study  on  syn‑  diated spectra[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society
                   thesis  method  of  vertical  ground  motions  for  near‑fault   of America, 1983, 73(6A): 1865‑1894.
                   regions considering the characteristics of source and site   [22] 强生银,王宏伟,温瑞智,等 .2021 年 5 月 21 日云南漾濞
                   condition[J].  Engineering  Mechanics,  2022,  39(6):   M S 6.4 地震随机有限断层三维地震动模拟[J]. 地球物
                   181‑190.                                          理学报,2021,64(12):4538‑4547.
             [12] HE  Z  Y,  YANG  H,  ZHU  J  Y,  et  al.  A  new  energy   QIANG  Shengyin,  WANG  Hongwei,  WEN  Ruizhi.
                   balance‑based  method  for  evaluating  seismic  perfor‑  Three‑dimensional  ground  motion  simulations  by  the
                   mance  of  isolated  bridges  under  near‑fault  ground  mo‑  stochastic  finite‑fault  method  for  the  Yangbi,  Yunnan
                   tions[J]. Structures, 2021, 34: 3724‑3737.        M S 6.4  earthquake  on  May  21,  2021[J].  Chinese  Jour‑
             [13] HUANG H C, CHIU H C. The effect of canyon topog‑   nal of Geophysics, 2021,64(12):4538‑4547.
                   raphy on strong ground motion at Feitsui damsite: quan‑  [23] BOORE  D  M.  Comparing  stochastic  point‑source  and
                   titative  results[J].  Earthquake  Engineering  Structural   finite‑source  ground‑motion  simulations:  SMSIM  and
                   Dynamics, 1995, 24(7): 977‑990.                   EXSIM[J].  Bulletin  of  the  Seismological  Society  of
             [14] 王海云,谢礼立 . 自贡市西山公园地形对地震动的影响                         America, 2009, 99(6): 3202‑3216.
                  [J]. 地球物理学报,2010,53(7):1631‑1638.             [24] KANEKO Y, SHEARER P M. Seismic source spectra
                   WANG  Haiyun,  XIE  Lili.  Effects  of  topography  on   and  estimated  stress  drop  derived  from  cohesive‑zone
                   ground motion in Xishan Park, Zigong City[J].Chinese   models  of  circular  subshear  rupture[J].  Geophysical
                   Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(7): 1631‑1638.    Journal International, 2014, 197(2): 1002‑1015.
             [15] 高玉峰,代登辉,张宁 . 河谷地形地震放大效应研究进                    [25] SARAGONI G R, HART G C. Simulation of artificial
                   展 与 展 望[J]. 防 灾 减 灾 工 程 学 报 ,2021,41(4):          earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296