Page 158 - 《软件学报》2025年第9期

马杰 等: 基于相关性提示的知识图谱问答 4069

Linguistics, 2022. 320–335. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.26]
[6] Shu WT, Li RX, Sun TX, Huang XJ, Qiu XP. Large language models: Principles, implementation, and progress. Journal of Computer
Research and Development, 2024, 61(2): 351–361 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.202330303]
[7] Maynez J, Narayan S, Bohnet B, McDonald R. On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. In: Proc. of the 58th Annual
Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsbug: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. 1906–1919.
[doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173]
[8] Agrawal G, Kumarage T, Alghamdi Z, Liu H. Can knowledge graphs reduce hallucinations in LLMs?: A survey. arXiv:2311.07914,
2024.
[9] Zhang TC, Tian X, Sun XH, Yu MH, Sun YH, Yu G. Overview on knowledge graph embedding technology research. Ruan Jian Xue
Bao/Journal of Software, 2023, 34(1): 277–311 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.jos.org.cn/1000-9825/6429.htm [doi: 10.
13328/j.cnki.jos.006429]
[10] Baek J, Aji AF, Saffari A. Knowledge-augmented language model prompting for zero-shot knowledge graph question answering. In:
Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Matching from Unstructured and Structured Data. Toronto: Association for Computational Linguistics,
2023. 70–98. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.matching-1.7]
[11] Kim J, Kwon Y, Jo Y, Choi E. KG-GPT: A general framework for reasoning on knowledge graphs using large language models. In:
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023.
9410–9421. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.631]
[12] Taffa TA, Usbeck R. Leveraging LLMs in scholarly knowledge graph question answering. In: Joint Proc. of Scholarly QALD 2023 and
SemREC 2023 co-located with the 22nd Int’l Semantic Web Conf. ISWC 2023. Athens: CEUR-WS. org, 2023. 3592.
[13] Qiao SJ, Yang GP, Yu Y, Han N, Qin X, Qu LL, Ran LQ, Li H. QA-KGNet: Language model-driven knowledge graph question-
answering model. Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2023, 34(10): 4584–4600 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.jos.
org.cn/1000-9825/6882.htm [doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006882]
[14] Zhang HY, Wang X, Han LF, Li Z, Chen ZR, Chen Z. Research on question answering system on joint of knowledge graph and large
language models. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science & Technology, 2023, 17(10): 2377–2388 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2308070]
[15] Bao ZJ, Chen W, Xiao SZ, Ren K, Wu JA, Zhong C, Peng JJ, Huang XJ, Wei ZY. DISC-MedLLM: Bridging general large language
models and real-world medical consultation. arXiv:2308.14346, 2023.
[16] Cui JX, Ning MN, Li ZJ, Chen BH, Yan Y, Li H, Ling B, Tian YH, Yuan L. Chatlaw: A multi-agent collaborative legal assistant with
knowledge graph enhanced mixture-of-experts large language model. arXiv:2306.16092, 2024.
[17] Wang N, Yang HY, Wang CD. FinGPT: Instruction tuning benchmark for open-source large language models in financial datasets. arXiv:
2310.04793, 2023.
[18] Wang WS, Xing M. Mechanical Manufacturing Handbook. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House, 2002 (in
Chinese).
[19] Agarwal A, Gawade S, Azad AP, Bhattacharyya P. KITLM: Domain-specific knowledge integration into language models for question
answering. arXiv:2308.03638, 2023.
[20] Bulian J, Buck C, Gajewski W, Börschinger B, Schuster T. Tomayto, tomahto. Beyond token-level answer equivalence for question
answering evaluation. In: Proc. of the 2022 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Abu Dhabi: Association for
Computational Linguistics, 2022. 291–305. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.20]
[21] Touvron H, Lavril T, Izacard G, Martinet X, Lachaux MA, Lacroix T, Rozière B, Goyal N, Hambro E, Azhar F, Rodriguez A, Joulin A,
Grave E, Lample G. LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
[22] Gao YF, Xiong Y, Gao XY, Jia KX, Pan JL, Bi YX, Dai Y, Sun JW, Wang M, Wang HF. Retrieval-augmented generation for large
language models: A survey. arXiv:2312.10997, 2024.
[23] Che WX, Dou ZC, Feng YS, Gui T, Han XP, Hu BT, Huang ML, Huang XJ, Liu K, Liu T, Liu ZY, Qin B, Qiu XP, Wan XJ, Wang YX,
Wen JR, Yan R, Zhang JJ, Zhang M, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Zhao X, Zhao YY. Towards a comprehensive understanding of the impact of large
language models on natural language processing: Challenges, opportunities and future directions. SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis,
2023, 53(9): 1645–1687 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.1360/SSI-2023-0113]
[24] Hu EJ, Shen YL, Wallis P, Allen-Zhu Z, Li YZ, Wang SA, Wang L, Chen WZ. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In:
Proc. of the 10th Int’l Conf. on Learning Representations. 2022. [doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.09685]
[25] Liu X, Ji KX, Fu YC, Tam W, Du ZX, Yang ZL, Tang J. P-Tuning: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning across scales and
tasks. In: Proc. of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Dublin: Association for Computational
Linguistics, 2022. 61–68. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.8]
[26] Liu X, Ji KX, Fu YC, Tam WL, Du ZX, Yang ZL, Tang J. P-Tuning v2: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning universally