Page 130 - 摩擦学学报2025年第8期

1228 摩擦学学报（中英文） 第 45 卷

刀贯入难度增加，使得比能最高，破岩效率降低. wear behavior of tunnel boring machine disc cutter ring under Fe-

based coatings[J]. Wear, 2024, 548: 205361. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.
3 结 论 2024.205361.
[ 6 ] Fu Jie, Liu Huashan, Feng Lisha, et al. Wear performance of
a. 螺旋槽滚刀在磨损前后都具有比平顶滚刀更
modified H-13 and H418E steels for TBM disc cutter ring[J].
为优良的破岩性能. 螺旋槽滚刀切削力更低，在相同的 Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024, 156: 107783. doi: 10.1016/j.
贯入度下所需载荷更小，振动程度更低. 同时螺旋槽 engfailanal.2023.107783.
滚刀破岩体积相较平顶滚刀变化较小，因此螺旋槽滚 [ 7 ] Jiang Jinzhe, Liu Yue, Liu Chunming. Experimental investigation on
the wear characteristics of a novel TBM cutter ring material with
刀具有更低的比能和更高的破岩能量利用效率.
high hardness and high toughness under different rock conditions[J].
b. 螺旋槽滚刀在磨损过程中具有自锐性，螺旋槽
Tribology, 2024, 44(5): 622–632 (in Chinese) [蒋金哲, 刘越, 刘春
滚刀现场磨损试验表明，滚刀刃齿表面存在程度不一
明. 不同岩石工况下新型高硬韧TBM刀圈用钢的磨损特性试验
的磨损，其中刃齿边缘磨损量较大，使单个刃齿表面 研究[J]. 摩擦学学报(中英文), 2024, 44(5): 622–632]. doi: 10.
积随磨损深度的增加不断减少，从而使刀-岩平均接 16078/j.tribology.2023029.
触面积减小，即具有自锐性，磨损后相同推力下滚刀 [ 8 ] Chen Kui, Feng Huanhuan, He Fei. Challenges in tunnel
表面接触压力更大且更易侵入岩石. construction and preliminary study on innovative TBM design for
c. 螺旋槽滚刀锐化与平顶滚刀钝化后性能演变 Sichuan-Tibet railway[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(2):
165–174 (in Chinese) [陈馈, 冯欢欢, 贺飞. 川藏铁路TBM隧道建
趋势不同. 离散元-动力学分析表明，磨损后螺旋槽滚
设挑战及装备创新设计探讨[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(2):
刀平均切削力和比能降低，但振动烈度有上升趋势.
165–174]. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.2096-4498.2021.02.002.
反之，平顶滚刀磨损后刃宽增大，使平均切削力和比 [ 9 ] Huang Dan, Ma Hao, Yang Xiaocong, et al. Current research and
能升高，破岩更为困难. prospect on cutter wear of tunnelling boring machine[J].
Geotechnical Engineering Technique, 2023, 37(3): 253–261 (in
参 考 文 献
Chinese) [黄丹, 马昊, 杨小聪, 等. TBM滚刀磨损研究现状及展
[ 1 ] Liu Quansheng, Huang Xing, Gong Qiuming, et al. Application and 望[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2023, 37(3): 253–261]. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.
development of hard rock TBM and its prospect in China[J]. 1007-2993.2023.03.001.
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57: 33–46. [10] Tan Qing, Li Jianfang, Xia Yimin, et al. Numerical research on rock
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.034. fragmentation process by disc cutter[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,
[ 2 ] Zhao Xianqiong, Deng Kai, Zhang Yazhou, et al. Molding quality 2013, 34(9): 2707–2714 (in Chinese) [谭青, 李建芳, 夏毅敏, 等. 盘
inspection method for large-diameter shield tunnels[J]. Chinese 形滚刀破岩过程的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(9): 2707–
Journal of Engineering, 2024, 46(2): 365–375 (in Chinese) [赵先琼, 2714]. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2013.09.042.
邓凯, 张亚洲, 等. 大直径盾构隧道成型质量巡检方法研究[J]. 工 [11] Duan Wenjun, Zhang Mengqi, Gou Bin, et al. Influence of cross-
程科学学报, 2024, 46(2): 365–375]. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389. section profile on wear behavior of TBM cutters in hard rock
2023.02.04.001. stratum[J]. Tribology, 2023, 43(7): 738–749 (in Chinese) [段文军,
[ 3 ] Wang Bin, Yang Yandong, Zhou Jianjun, et al. Surrounding rock 张蒙祺, 勾斌, 等. 刃形对硬岩地层中TBM滚刀磨损行为的影响
deformation control technology for tunnels constructed using open 研 究 [J]. 摩 擦 学 学 报 , 2023, 43(7): 738–749]. doi: 10.16078/j.
tunnel boring machines in soft rock strata with high geostress: a case tribology.2022102.
study of Xianglushan tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2024, 44(2): [12] Sun Ruixue, Duan Wenjun, Mou Song, et al. Impact-sliding
341–348 (in Chinese) [王斌, 杨延栋, 周建军, 等. 高地应力软岩地 composite wear properties of shield cutter ring material[J].
层敞开式TBM法隧洞围岩变形控制技术: 以香炉山隧洞为例[J]. Tribology, 2022, 42(2): 314–325 (in Chinese) [孙瑞雪, 段文军, 牟
隧 道 建 设 (中 英 文 ), 2024, 44(2): 341–348]. doi: 10.3973/j.issn. 松, 等. 盾构滚刀刀圈材料的冲滑复合磨损性能研究[J]. 摩擦学学
2096-4498.2024.02.013. 报, 2022, 42(2): 314–325]. doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2021012.
[ 4 ] Xia Yimin, Zhang Rui, Cong Guoqiang, et al. Heat treatment [13] Huo Junzhou, Zhang Haidong, Xu Zhaohui, et al. Coupling dynamic
process and performance prediction of disc cutter ring[J]. Hot characteristics of tunnel boring machine cutterhead system with
Working Technology, 2016, 45(22): 160–162 (in Chinese) [夏毅敏, multi-source uncertainties[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022,
张睿, 丛国强, 等. 盘形滚刀刀圈热处理工艺及其性能预测[J]. 热 137: 106180. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106180.
加工工艺, 2016, 45(22): 160–162]. doi: 10.14158/j.cnki.1001-3814. [14] Cho J W, Jeon S, Yu S H, et al. Optimum spacing of TBM disc
2016.22.043. cutters: a numerical simulation using the three-dimensional dynamic
[ 5 ] Lin Laikuang, Zeng Jun, Fu Jie, et al. Experimental study of the fracturing method[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space