Page 138 - 《爆炸与冲击》2026年第3期
P. 138

第 46 卷          邹    震,等: 增强内凹蜂窝夹层结构弯曲力学性能及多目标优化设计                              第 3 期

                    Advanced Materials and Structures, 2022, 29(26): 4839–4864. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1941448.
               [3]   GUO H Y, YUAN H, ZHANG J X, et al. Review of sandwich structures under impact loadings: experimental, numerical and
                    theoretical analysis [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024, 196: 111541. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111541.
               [4]   WU X W, GUO H Y, ZHANG J X. Bi-surface induction in biomimetic multi-gradient foam-filled tubes with enhanced energy
                    absorption: theory, experiment, and simulation [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2025, 92(5): 051010. DOI: 10.1115/1.4068061.
               [5]   余同希, 朱凌, 许骏. 结构冲击动力学进展     (2010-2020) [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(12): 121401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0113.
                    YU T X, ZHU L, XU J. Progress in structural impact dynamics during 2010-2020 [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021,
                    41(12): 121401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0113.
               [6]   周睿, 岳增申, 徐轩, 等. 多级金属波纹夹层结构的抗强动冲击特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(11): 113102. DOI:
                    10.11883/bzycj-2023-0296.
                    ZHOU  R,  YUE  Z  S,  XU  X,  et  al.  Dynamic  responses  of  metallic  hierarchical  corrugated  sandwich  beams  under  shock
                    loadings [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2024, 44(11): 113102. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0296.
               [7]   黄治镡, 何成龙, 王玉浩, 等. 铝/CFRP  面板蜂窝夹层结构低速冲击特性 [J/OL]. 复合材料学报, (2025-02-24)[2025-06-04].
                    https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20250224.001. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20250224.001.
                    HUANG Z T, HE C L, WANG Y H, et al. Low-velocity characteristics of honeycomb sandwich structure with Al/CFRP face-
                    sheets [J/OL]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, (2025-02-24)[2025-06-04]. https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20250224.
                    001. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20250224.001.
               [8]   YUAN G, HUANG H W. Energy absorption characteristics and optimization of three-beam star honeycomb [J]. Mechanics of
                    Advanced Materials and Structures, 2023, 30(8): 1559–1573. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2037171.
               [9]   NAJAFI M, AHMADI H, LIAGHAT G. Investigation on the flexural properties of sandwich beams with auxetic core [J].
                    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 61. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-022-03368-3.
               [10]   ZHANG W, YIN S, YU T X, et al. Crushing resistance and energy absorption of pomelo peel inspired hierarchical honeycomb [J].
                    International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 125: 163–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.014.
               [11]   YOU J F, ZHANG H C, ZHU H X, et al. The high strain compression of micro- and nano-sized random irregular honeycombs [J].
                    Materials Research Express, 2016, 3(9): 095023. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/3/9/095023.
               [12]   LV H Y, SHI S S, CHEN B Z, et al. Low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich structure with grid-honeycomb
                    hybrid core [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2023, 246: 108149. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108149.
               [13]   袁敏, 徐峰祥, 龚铭远. 梯度厚度负泊松比蜂窝材料面内冲击特性 [J]. 塑性工程学报, 2021, 28(6): 192–199. DOI:
                    10.3969/j.issn.1007-2012.2021.06.025.
                    YUAN M, XU F X, GONG M Y. In-plane impact performance of honeycomb material with gradient thickness and negative
                    Poisson’s ratio [J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2021, 28(6): 192–199. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2012.2021.06.025.
               [14]   蒋舟顺, 徐峰祥, 邹震, 等. 爆炸载荷下正弦曲边三维负泊松比夹芯板的动态响应和吸能特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024,
                    44(2): 021001. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0214.
                    JIANG  Z  S,  XU  F  X,  ZOU  Z,  et  al.  Dynamic  response  and  energy  absorption  properties  of  sinusoidally  curved  three-
                    dimensional negative Poissonʼs ratio sandwich panels subjected to blast loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2):
                    021001. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0214.
               [15]   JEONG S, YOO H H. Shape optimization of bowtie-shaped auxetic structures using beam theory [J]. Composite Structures,
                    2019, 224: 111020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111020.
               [16]   LU Z X, LI X, YANG Z Y, et al. Novel structure with negative Poisson's ratio and enhanced Young’s modulus [J]. Composite
                    Structures, 2016, 138: 243–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.036.
               [17]   ZOU Z, XU F X, NIU X Q, et al. In-plane crashing behavior and energy absorption of re-entrant honeycomb reinforced by
                    arched ribs [J]. Composite Structures, 2023, 325: 117615. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117615.
               [18]   ZOU  Z,  XU  F  X,  NIU  X  Q,  et  al.  In-plane  crashing  behavior  and  energy  absorption  of  graded  re-entrant  honeycombs
                    reinforced by catenary [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024, 203: 112253. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2024.112253.
               [19]   ZOU Z, REID S R, TAN P J, et al. Dynamic crushing of honeycombs and features of shock fronts [J]. International Journal of
                    Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(1): 165–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.008.
               [20]   SANTOSA S P, WIERZBICKI T, HANSSEN A G, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections [J].
                    International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2000, 24(5): 509–534. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00036-6.
               [21]   余同希, 卢国兴, 张雄. 能量吸收: 结构与材料的力学行为和塑性分析 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 2–17.
                                                                                          (责任编辑    张凌云)



                                                         033103-15
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143