Page 56 - 《渔业研究》2025年第6期
P. 56

第 6 期     戴景辉等:蛙源与鱼源无乳链球菌的遗传分化、基因分型、毒力谱、耐药性与致病性比较研究                                    747




                Comparative studies on genetic differentiation, genotyping, virulence profiles,
                     drug resistance and pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae of frog
                                                    and fish origin



                                        DAI Jinghui,ZHOU Dan,BAI Lin,YANG Tao    *
                 (Key Laboratory of Aquatic Nutrition and Smart Aquaculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tongwei Agricultural
                                            Development Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041, China)


               Abstract: [Objective] This study aims to investigate the differences in biological characteristics, molecular
               typing,  and  pathogenicity  to  bullfrogs  among  Streptococcus  agalactiae  strains  from  different  host  sources,
               providing  a  theoretical  basis  for  aquaculture  disease  prevention  and  control.  [Methods]  Five  frog-derived
                                                                                          #
                                                                                             #
                                                       #
                                                                                  #
                                                                                      #
               strains (one from Pelophylax nigromaculatus, 14 ; four from Rana catesbeiana, 19 , 20 , 24 , 25 ) and two Nile
               tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)-derived strains (TW2018-78, TW2021-21) were selected. Species identification
               was conducted using 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis and detection of the cfb gene. Further analyses included
               growth characteristics, capsular polysaccharide serotyping, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), virulence and
               antibiotic resistance gene profiling, and evaluation of pathogenicity to bullfrogs through experimental infection.
               [Results] All seven strains were identified as S. agalactiae. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that frog- and O.
               niloticus-derived strains belonged to distinct evolutionary lineages. The frog-derived strains were all of the Ⅰb-
               ST261  type,  optimally  grew  at  28  °C,  and  tested  negative  for  both  haemolysis  and  synergistic  haemolysis
               (CAMP test). In contrast, the O. niloticus-derived strains were of the Ⅰa-ST7 type, grew well at 37 °C, and
                                                                                                 #
               tested positive for β-haemolysis and the CAMP test. Experimental infections showed that strain 25  (frog-de-
               rived) was highly pathogenic to bullfrogs, while O. niloticus-derived strains were non-pathogenic. Virulence
               gene profiling showed that frog-derived strains commonly carried cfb, hylB, and sip, with some also harboring
               bca, bibA and fbsB, but lacked cylE and scpB. O. niloticus-derived strains carried a broader spectrum of vir-
               ulence genes. Antibiotic resistance gene analysis revealed that frog-derived strains only carried ermA, while O.
               niloticus-derived strains carried multiple resistance genes including ermA, sul1, qnrS, and pbp2x, with observed
               inconsistencies between genotype and phenotype. [Conclusion] S. agalactiae strains from different hosts ex-
               hibit significant differences in genetic background, physiology, virulence profiles, antimicrobial resistance, and
               pathogenicity, indicating potential host adaptation. The results of the study provides a theoretical basis for tar-
               geted prevention and control strategies of S. agalactiae in aquaculture.
               Key words: Streptococcus agalactiae; phylogeny; multilocus sequence typing (MLST); capsular polysaccharide
               serotype; virulence genes; drug resistance; pathogenicity
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61