Page 145 - 《运动与健康科学》(英文)2024年第2期
P. 145

TaggedAPTARAEndMotor units’ adaptations to disuse and active recovery                                 267
           3 times/week with at least 24 h of recovery between sessions.  816 mA (Digitimer Ltd, Welwyn Garden, Hertfordshire,
                                                                     14
           Every session was composed of 3 sets of 10 repetitions of leg  UK). TaggedAPTARAEnd
           press and leg extension at 70% 1 repetition maximum (RM)  TaggedAPTARAPBefore placing the matrix, the skin was shaved, cleaned
           after a warm-up period at 30% 1RM. Both exercises were  with 70% ethanol, and then with abrasive-conductive paste
           executed from full knee extension (0˚) to »90˚ limb flexion.  (Spes medica, Salerno, Italy). Reference electrodes were
           Sets were separated by a 2-min rest. The time under tension  placed on the malleolus and patella bones. After the record-
                                                                 ings, the matrix border was marked with a permanent marker
           was set at »2 s both in the concentric and eccentric phases.TaggedAPTARAEnd
             TaggedAPTARAP1RM was estimated from the 4RM6RM during the first  and emphasized by the operator at every meeting with the
           exercise session 18  of each week, and the load employed was  participants to allow the reproducible placement of the matrix
                                                                                                22
           adjusted accordingly.TaggedAPTARAEnd                  in the following data collection points. TaggedAPTARAEnd
             TaggedAPTARAPThe choice of the intensity and the decision to indirectly esti-
           mate the 1RM were based on the participant characteristics (i.e.,  TaggedAPTARAP2.3.3. HD-EMG recordingsTaggedAPTARAEnd
           not previously involved in resistance exercise and coming from  TaggedAPTARAPThe HD-EMG signal was recorded during trapezoidal
                                                                 contractions (Fig. 1C) at 3 different submaximal intensities
           10 days of complete unloading of the lower limb).TaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                 (10%, 25%, and 50% MVC). All the contractions had a total
                                                                 duration of 30 s. The ramp-up and ramp-down phases were
                                                                 performed with a linear force increase/decrease set at 5%
           TaggedAPTARAH22.3. MeasurementsTaggedAPTARAEnd              23
                                                                 MVC/s,   and the duration of the steady-state phase was
                                                                 adjusted accordingly (e.g., at 25% MVC, the ramps lasted 5 s
           TaggedAPTARAP2.3.1. MVCTaggedAPTARAEnd
             TaggedAPTARAPMVC was assessed during MVC of the knee extensor  each and the steady-state 20 s for a total 30 s contraction) (Fig.
           muscles at a 90˚ knee angle using a custom-made knee dyna-  1C). All the trapezoidal contractions were repeated twice with
           mometer fitted with a load cell (RS 2060290; Tedea    60 s of rest in between, and the different intensities were
           Huntleigh, Selb, Germany) and attached above the ankle with  proposed in random order. Participants received real-time
           straps (Fig. 1B), as previously described. 4,14 TaggedAPTARAEnd  visual feedback of the force produced and were instructed to
             TaggedAPTARAPIn order to ensure correct assessment of MVC, 19  partici-  match the trapezoidal template as precisely as possible.TaggedAPTARAEnd
           pants practiced the task during the familiarization session  TaggedAPTARAPEMG and force signals were sampled at 2048 Hz with the
           supervised by an experienced operator. They were instructed  EMG-Quattrocento (OT Bioelettronica). The EMG signal was
           to “push as hard as possible” by pushing the dominant leg  recorded in monopolar configuration, amplified (£ 150), and
           against the load cell and maintaining the contraction for 34s.  band-pass filtered (10500 Hz) at source. 23  Force was
           After a standardized warm-up executed up to 70% of their  recorded synchronously with the EMG signal, and the offset
           perceived maximum, participants practiced the maximal task  was removed before starting the recording.TaggedAPTARAEnd
           until they became able to consistently reach their maximum
           force values. During every contraction, participants were stabi-  TaggedAPTARAP2.3.4. Force and HD-EMG signal analysesTaggedAPTARAEnd
           lized to the seat by straps at the waist in order to prevent any  TaggedAPTARAPThe force signal was converted to Newton (N) and low-pass
           compensatory movement. Loud verbal encouragement was  filtered (fourth-order, zero-lag, Butterworth, and 15 Hz cut-off). 23
           provided to encourage the maximum voluntary effort. At each  Force steadiness was computed as the coefficient of variation of
           data collection point, the test was repeated 3 times with 60 s of  force recorded during the steady-state phase (COV steady )of the
           rest, and only the contraction with the maximum value was  trapezoidal contractions and expressed as percentage (i.e., the
                                                                                      24
           considered for the MVC calculation.TaggedAPTARAEnd    ratio of the SD to the mean). TaggedAPTARAEnd
                                                                   TaggedAPTARAPThe HD-EMG signal was band-pass filtered between 20 Hz
                                                                 and 500 Hz (second-order; Butterworth) and decomposed into
           TaggedAPTARAP2.3.2. HD-EMG matrix placementTaggedAPTARAEnd
             TaggedAPTARAPThe HD-EMG signal was recorded from the vastus lateralis  discharge times of the MUs with the validated convolutive
           muscle (Fig. 1B) using a matrix of 64 equally spaced elec-  blind source separation technique (Fig. 1D) (OTBioLab+; OT
           trodes (GR08MM1305; OT Bioelettronica, Torino, Italy) filled  Bioelettronica). 25  After the decomposition, the pattern of
           with conductive cream (Ac cream; OT Bioelettronica) and  discharge times for each MU was visually inspected and manu-
           arranged over 5 columns and 13 rows with 8 mm interelectrode  ally edited. 26  Only the identified MUs with a pulse to noise
                                             2
           distance, which corresponded to 30.72 cm of recording area.TaggedAPTARAEnd  ratio (PNR) of 28 decibel (dB) (sensitivity of >85%) were
                                                                                          27
             TaggedAPTARAPThe matrix was placed following the muscle fascicle  maintained for further analyses. TaggedAPTARAEnd
           orientation (detected with B-mode ultrasound; Mylab70;  TaggedAPTARAPAll MUs decomposed from the 2 trapezoidal contractions
           Esaote, Genoa, Italy) 20  and with the central electrodes of  recorded at the same intensity during the same data collection
           the last 2 rows of the matrix over the innervation zone. 21  point (for each participant) were pooled and analyzed together
           The ultrasound recordings were used also to detect muscle  after the removal of duplicated MUs (as explained in Section
           borders and avoid the placement of the matrix across adja-  2.3.5.). This approach allowed us to increase the number of
                                                                 unique MUs, to reduce variability induced by the inability of a
           cent muscles.TaggedAPTARAEnd
             TaggedAPTARAPThe innervation zone was detected between 35% and 20%  participant to reproduce the trapezoidal path, and to avoid
           of femur length 21  with low-intensity percutaneous electrical  results biased by the duplication of values, which would occur
           stimulation using a pen electrode with an electrical current of  if duplicated MUs were not removed.TaggedAPTARAEnd
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150