Page 11 - 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2025年第10期
P. 11

1946                            武 汉 大 学 学 报  (信 息 科 学 版)                       2025 年 10 月

                    [J].  Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2014, 171(8):   [51]  AKI  K,  PATTON  H.   Determination  of  Seismic
                     1695-1704.                                      Moment Tensor Using Surface Waves[J].  Tectono‑
                [41]  KHAN  A,  CONNOLLY  J  A  D,  TAYLOR  S  R.    physics, 1978, 49(3/4): 213-222.
                     Inversion of Seismic and Geodetic Data for the Major   [52]  PATTON H.  Reference Point Equalization Method
                     Element Chemistry and Temperature of the Earth’s   for Determining the Source and Path Effects of Sur‑
                     Mantle[J].  Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid   face  Waves[J].   Journal  of  Geophysical  Research:
                     Earth, 2008, 113(B9): 2007JB005239.             Solid Earth, 1980, 85(B2): 821-848.
                [42]  FUKUDA  J,  JOHNSON  K  M.   A  Fully  Bayesian   [53]  WARD  S  N.   A  Technique  for  the  Recovery  of  the
                     Inversion  for  Spatial  Distribution  of  Fault  Slip  with   Seismic  Moment  Tensor  Applied  to  the  Oaxaca,
                     Objective Smoothing[J].  The Bulletin of the Seismo‑  Mexico Earthquake of November 1978[J].  Bulletin
                     logical  Society  of  America,  2008,  98(3):  1128-  of  the  Seismological  Society  of  America,  1980,  70
                     1146.                                           (3): 717-734.
                [43]  FUKUDA J, JOHNSON K M.  Mixed Linear-Non-  [54]  FITCH T J, MCCOWAN D W, SHIELDS M W.
                     Linear  Inversion  of  Crustal  Deformation  Data:   Estimation  of  the  Seismic  Moment  Tensor  from
                     Bayesian  Inference  of  Model,  Weighting  and  Regu‑  Teleseismic  Body  Wave  Data  with  Applications  to
                     larization  Parameters  Free[J].   Geophysical  Journal   Intraplate  and  Mantle  Earthquakes[J].   Journal  of
                     International, 2010, 181(3): 1441-1458.         Geophysical  Research:  Solid  Earth,  1980,  85
                [44]  冯 万 鹏 , 李 振 洪 .  InSAR 资 料 约 束 下 震 源 参 数 的     (B7): 3817-3828.
                     PSO 混 合 算 法 反 演 策 略[J].   地 球 物 理 学 进 展 ,   [55]  DZIEWONSKI  A  M,  CHOU  T  A,  WOOD‑
                     2010, 25(4): 1189-1196.                         HOUSE  J  H.   Determination  of  Earthquake  Source
                     FENG  Wanpeng,  LI  Zhenhong.   A  Novel  Hybrid   Parameters from Waveform Data for Studies of Global
                     PSO/Simplex  Algorithm  for  Determining  Earth‑  and Regional Seismicity[J].  Journal of Geophysical
                     quake  Source  Parameters  Using  InSAR  Data[J].    Research: Solid Earth, 1981, 86(B4): 2825-2852.
                     Progress in Geophysics, 2010, 25(4): 1189-1196.  [56]  LISOWSKI  M,  PRESCOTT  W  H,  SAVAGE  J
                [45]  SUN  J  B,SHEN  Z  K,BÜRGMANN  R,et  al. A     C,et al.  Geodetic Estimate of Coseismic Slip During
                     Three-Step Maximum a Posteriori Probability Method   the  1989  Loma  Prieta,  California,  Earthquake[J].
                     for InSAR Data Inversion of Coseismic Rupture with   Geophysical Research Letters, 1990, 17(9): 1437-
                     Application  to  the  14  April  2010  Mw  6. 9  Yushu,   1440.
                     China,  Earthquake[J].   Journal  of  Geophysical  Re‑  [57]  FENG W P, SAMSONOV S, QIU Q, et al.  Or‑
                     search: Solid Earth, 2013, 118(8): 4599-4627.   thogonal Fault Rupture and Rapid Postseismic Defor‑
                [46]  VELEZ  M  L,  EUILLADES  P,  CASELLI  A,  et   mation  Following  2019  Ridgecrest,  California,
                     al.   Deformation  of  Copahue  Volcano:  Inversion  of   Earthquake  Sequence  Revealed  from  Geodetic  Ob‑
                     InSAR Data Using a Genetic Algorithm[J].  Journal   servations[J].  Geophysical Research Letters, 2020,
                     of  Volcanology  and  Geothermal  Research,  2011,   47(5): e2019GL086888.
                     202(1/2): 117-126.                         [58]  WANG L, SHUM C K, SIMONS F J, et al.  Co‑
                [47]  ZHAO X, WANG C, ZHANG H, et al.  Inversion     seismic and Postseismic Deformation of the 2011 To‑
                     of  Seismic  Source  Parameters  from  Satellite  InSAR   hoku-Oki  Earthquake  Constrained  by  GRACE  Gra‑
                     Data  Based  on  Deep  Learning[J].   Tectonophysics,   vimetry[J].  Geophysical Research Letters, 2012, 39
                     2021, 821: 229140.                              (7): 2012GL051104.
                [48]  SUN  L  X,  WANG  L  Y,  XU  G  Y,  et  al.   A  New   [59]  HAN S C, RIVA R, SAUBER J, et al.  Source Pa‑
                     Method of Variational Bayesian Slip Distribution In‑  rameter  Inversion  for  Recent  Great  Earthquakes
                     version[J].  Journal of Geodesy, 2023, 97(1): 10.  from  a  Decade-Long  Observation  of  Global  Gravity
                [49]  STUMP  B  W,  JOHNSON  L  R.   The  Determina‑  Fields[J].   Journal  of  Geophysical  Research:  Solid
                     tion  of  Source  Properties  by  the  Linear  Inversion  of   Earth, 2013, 118(3): 1240-1267.
                     Seismograms[J].  The Bulletin of the Seismological   [60]  WESTON  J,  FERREIRA  A  M  G,  FUNNING  G
                     Society of America, 1977, 67(6): 1489-1502.     J.   Joint  Earthquake  Source  Inversions  Using  Seis‑
                [50]  Patton H.  J.  Source and Propagation Effects of Ray‑  mo-Geodesy and 3-D Earth Models Free[J].  Geo‑
                     leigh  Waves  from  Central  Asian  Earthquakes[D].    physical  Journal  International,  2014,  198(2) :
                     Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology,   671-696.
                     1978.                                      [61]  WALD  D  J,  HELMBERGER  D  V,  HEATON  T
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16