Page 48 - 《水产学报》2026年第2期
P. 48

2 期                                     水    产    学    报                                 50 卷

              findings  reinforce  that  sex-linked  transcriptional  bias  females when no cross-sex invariant reference exists.
              represents a key contributor to reference-gene instabil-
                                                                4    CONCLUSION
              ity [48-49] .
                   When no pronounced sex difference is evident—   In conclusion, this study systematically evaluated
              either  among  tissues  within  one  sex  or  between  the  stability  of  five  conventional  reference  genes  in
              sexes  with  similar  expression  levels —individual  diverse  tissues  of  both  male  and  female  S.  japonica.
              variability becomes a major source of stability vari-  Among  all  candidates,  the  commonly  used  reference
              ation.  The  C   range  reflects  expression  consistency  genes β-actin and gapdh showed pronounced variabil-
                          t
              across individuals: a wider range indicates lower stabil-  ity  in  expression  stability  among  tissues  and  between
              ity.  For  instance,  ef-1α  displayed  comparable  mean  sexes, underscoring their limited suitability for normal-
              expression levels in male and female pancreas but the  ization. 18S exhibited the highest expression and low-
              boadest  C   range  in  males,  resulting  in  lower  stability  est  variability  but  displayed  sex-biased  expression,
                      t
              relative  to  β-actin  and  ef-1γ.  In  contrast,  ef-1α  in  whereas ef-1α and ef-1γ remained consistently stable in
              females  showed  the  narrowest  C   variation  and  hence  most  tissues  of  both  sexes,  with  ef-1α  being  the  most
                                         t
              the  highest  stability.  Moreover,  stability  rankings  robust.  Multi-algorithm  analysis  confirmed  that  ef-1α
              depend not only on the variability of each gene but also  and ef-1γ showed the greatest overall stability followed
              on  that  of  co-analyzed  genes  and  the  weighting  by 18S, while β-actin and gapdh were the least stable.
              strategies of algorithms such as RefFinder, which integ-  geNorm pairwise variation analysis (V 2/3  < 0.15) indic-
              rates  geNorm,  NormFinder,  and  BestKeeper [2,  11-12,  14] .  ated that two genes, mainly ef-1α and ef-1γ, are gener-
              This algorithmic difference may contribute to apparent  ally sufficient for reliable normalization in most tissues.
              reversals of stability between sexes or tissues, as they  Validation  using  transcriptome-derived  target  genes
              differ  in  how  they  account  for  C   standard  deviation,  (creld2, cd109, acy1, miox) confirmed that stable refer-
                                          t
              intra-group  consistency,  and  inter-gene  correlation,  ences  such  as  ef-1α  and  ef-1γ  accurately  reflect  the
              even subtle data differences may yield sex-and tissue-  expression differences among tissues, whereas unstable
              dependent ranking shifts.                        references such as β-actin and gapdh can bias or con-
                   Interestingly, females consistently showed greater  found  statistical  analyses.  Nevertheless,  variations  in
              variation  in  gene  stability,  a  pattern  also  reported  in  stability  patterns  and  rankings  among  tissues  and
                          [53]
              mouse  models .  While  the  underlying  cause  remains  between sexes were also observed, likely caused by dif-
                                                               ferences in cellular composition, metabolic activity, and
              uncertain, potential  factors  include  greater   physiolo-
                                                               sex-related  physiological  regulation,  emphasizing  the
              gical heterogeneity linked to reproductive cycling, fluc-
              tuating endocrine states [61-62] , and variable cellular com-  need  for  tissue-  and  sex-specific  validation.  Overall,
                                                               these  findings  establish  a  systematic  framework  for
              position  in  female-specific tissues  such  as  the   nida-
                                                               selecting reliable reference genes in S. japonica, thereby
              mental  gland  and  accessory  nidamental  gland.  Future
                                                               facilitating robust qPCR normalization and providing a
              studies should address these factors by sampling indi-
                                                               foundation  for  future  gene  expression  research  in  this
              viduals  at  defined  reproductive  stages  and  combining
                                                               species.
              transcriptomic or  proteomic  analyses  to  better   under-
              stand sex-specific transcriptional regulation.
                                                               (作者声明本文无利益冲突)
                   Taken together, biological and analytical factors
              contribute to sex- and tissue-specific variability in ref-  参考文献  (References):
              erence gene stability. For reliable qPCR normalization,  [  1  ]   Smith C J, Osborn A M. Advantages and limitations of quantit-
              reference gene stability should be assessed separately  ative PCR (Q-PCR)-based approaches in microbial ecology[J].
              for  each  tissue  and  sex,  and  the  most  stable  genes  FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2009, 67(1): 6-20.
              should  be  selected  independently  for  males  and  [  2  ]   Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normal-

              https://www.china-fishery.cn                           中国水产学会主办    sponsored by China Society of Fisheries
                                                            20
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53