Page 117 - 《水产学报》2025年第8期
P. 117

林悦彤,等                                                                 水产学报, 2025, 49(8): 089310


                            Tab. 2    List of private alleles detected at the 10 microsatellite loci in each population
                                                                 loci
                population
                           MC08    MC18     MC44    MC47    MC54    MC57    MC66    MC74     MC76    MC99
                   SS       175     228     173      -       236     289     234     286     285      392
                                    229     178                              246     287     290
                                    244                                              304
                                    256
                   JJ        -      237      -       292     223     284     247     297     270      -
                                    238              299     227     293     248             280
                                                             241
                   FD       224     224      -       297     250     299      -      281     283      400
                                                     305                             301     287
              Notes: “-” indicates the absence of private alleles at the locus, the same below.

                          Tab. 3    Chi-square test of allele frequencies in 10 microsatellite loci and byssus phenotype
                                                                     loci
                    phenotype
                                  MC08    MC18   MC44    MC47   MC54   MC57    MC66   MC74    MC76   MC99
                byssus secretion number  0.685  0.002 *  0.556  0.027 *  0.061  0.001 *  0.178  0.204  0.645  0.107
                byssal thread diameter  0.750  0.186  0.036 *  0.008 *  0.704  0.006 *  0.299  0.318  0.572  0.480
                byssal breaking force  0.811  0.022 *  0.041 *  0.071  0.529  0.017 *  0.028 *  0.011 *  0.124  0.235
                plaque adhesion strength  0.857  0.409  0.527  0.115  0.257  0.002 *  0.224  0.165  0.330  0.275
              Notes: “*” indicated at P<0.05, the same below. Bold font indicates significant differences between allele frequencies and byssus phenotype.

                                Tab. 4    AMOVA of three wild populations based on 10 microsatellite loci
                       source of variance      df       variance components  percentage of variation  F-statistic
                  among populations             2          0.122 14             5.18           F ST =0.051 76 *
                  among individuals / within population  165  0.309 04          13.10          F is =0.138 11 *
                  within individuals           168         1.928 57             81.73          F IT =0.182 72 *

              pairwise F  values indicated low genetic differenti-  force  were  among  the  three  populations,  with  the
                       ST
              ation  (F <0.05,  Tab.5).  The  neighbor-joining  tree
                     ST                                        highest values in the SS population that located at
              was constructed based on Nei’s D distance, with the  the highest latitude and the lowest values in the FD
              SS  population  on  a  separate  branch  and  the  other
                                                               population  that  located  at  the  lowest  latitude
              populations clustered on the other branch (Fig. 2).
                                                               (P<0.05;  Fig.  3-b,  c).  The  lowest  plaque  adhesion

              2.3      Byssus production  and  mechanical   per-  strength was found in mussels of the FD population
              formance                                         (Fig. 3-d).

                   The SS population had the highest mean num-
                                                               2.4    Body parameters and correlations
              ber of byssus secreted within 72 hours compared to
                                                                   In order to detect the effects of growth of mus-
              the other populations (Fig. 3-a). Significant differ-
              ences in byssal thread diameter and byssal breaking
                                                                                                      JJ

                Tab. 5    Estimated pairwise F ST  (lower diagonal) and
                   Nei’s D (upper diagonal) values of three wild                                      FD
                    populations based on 10 microsatellite loci
                  population    SS        JJ        FD                                                SS
                    SS                   0.084      0.119
                                                                            0.04        0.02          0
                    JJ         0.028                0.031
                                                                Fig. 2 Neighbor-joining tree of three wild populations
                    FD         0.041     0.018
                                                                  using Nei’s D unbiased genetic distance based on
              Notes: The pairwise Nei’s D values are in the upper diagonal.
                                                                             10 microsatellite loci
              https://www.china-fishery.cn                           中国水产学会主办    sponsored by China Society of Fisheries
                                                            6
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122