Page 486 - 《软件学报》2026年第1期
P. 486
张泽源 等: RPKI 测量研究综述 483
3624806]
[68] Rodday N, van Baaren R, Hendriks L, van Rijswijk-Deij R, Pras A, Dreo G. Evaluating RPKI ROV identification methodologies in
automatically generated Mininet topologies. In: Proc. of the 16th Int’l Conf. on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies.
Barcelona: ACM, 2020. 530–531. [doi: 10.1145/3386367.3431669]
[69] Qin CY, Zhang Y, Fang BX. Survey on decentralized security-enhanced technologies for RPKI. Journal on Communications, 2024,
45(7): 196–205 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2024102]
[70] Fontugne R, Phokeer A, Pelsser C, Vermeulen K, Bush R. RPKI time-of-flight: Tracking delays in the management, control, and data
planes. In: Proc. of the 24th Int’l Conf. on Passive and Active Measurement. Springer, 2023. 429–457. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-28486-1_18]
[71] Su YY, Li D, Chen L, Li Q, Ling ST. dRR: A decentralized, scalable, and auditable architecture for RPKI repository. In: Proc. of the 31st
Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symp. San Diego: Internet Society, 2024. [doi: 10.14722/ndss.2024.24368]
[72] Mirdita D, Schulmann H, Waidner M. SoK: An introspective analysis of RPKI security. arXiv:2408.12359, 2024.
[73] Friedemann PH, Rodday N, Rodosek GD. Assessing the RPKI validator ecosystem. In: Proc. of the 13th Int’l Conf. on Ubiquitous and
Future Networks. Barcelona: IEEE, 2022. 295–300. [doi: 10.1109/ICUFN55119.2022.9829712]
[74] Kristoff J, Bush R, Kanich C, Michaelson G, Phokeer A, Schmidt TC, Wählisch M. On measuring RPKI relying parties. In: Proc. of the
2020 ACM Internet Measurement Conf. ACM, 2020. 484–491. [doi: 10.1145/3419394.3423622]
[75] Mirdita D, Schulmann H, Vogel N, Waidner M. The CURE to vulnerabilities in RPKI validation. In: Proc. of the 31st Annual Network
and Distributed System Security Symp. San Diego: Internet Society, 2024. [doi: 10.14722/ndss.2024.241093]
[76] Hlavacek T, Jeitner P, Mirdita D, Shulman H, Waidner M. Stalloris: RPKI downgrade attack. In: Proc. of the 31st USENIX Security
Symp. 2022. 4455–4471.
[77] Hlavacek T, Jeitner P, Mirdita D, Shulman H, Waidner M. Behind the scenes of RPKI. In: Proc. of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conf. on
Computer and Communications Security. Los Angeles: ACM, 2022. 1413–1426. [doi: 10.1145/3548606.3560645]
[78] Hlavacek T, Cunha I, Gilad Y, Herzberg A, Katz-Bassett E, Schapira M, Shulman H. DISCO: Sidestepping RPKI’s deployment barriers.
In: Proc. of the 2020 Network and Distributed Systems Security Symp. San Diego: Internet Society, 2020. 1–17. [doi: 10.14722/ndss.
2020.2435]
[79] Gilad Y, Hlavacek T, Herzberg A, Schapira M, Shulman H. Perfect is the enemy of good: Setting realistic goals for BGP security. In:
Proc. of the 17th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. Redmond: ACM, 2018. 57–63. [doi: 10.1145/3286062.3286071]
[80] Cooper D, Heilman E, Brogle K, Reyzin L, Goldberg S. On the risk of misbehaving RPKI authorities. In: Proc. of the 12th ACM
Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. College Park: ACM, 2013. 16. [doi: 10.1145/2535771.2535787]
[81] Yoo CS, Wishnick DA. Lowering legal barriers to RPKI adoption. 2019. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=3308619#
[82] Hari A, Lakshman TV. The Internet blockchain: A distributed, tamper-resistant transaction framework for the Internet. In: Proc. of the
15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. Atlanta: ACM, 2016. 204–210. [doi: 10.1145/3005745.3005771]
[83] Xing QQ, Wang BS, Wang XF. BGPcoin: Blockchain-based Internet number resource authority and BGP security solution. Symmetry,
2018, 10(9): 408. [doi: 10.3390/sym10090408]
[84] Paillisse J, Manrique J, Bonet G, Rodriguez-Natal A, Maino F, Cabellos A. Decentralized trust in the inter-domain routing infrastructure.
IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 166896–166905. [doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2954096]
[85] Liu S, Yang F, Li DD, Bagnulo M, Liu BY, Huang XH. The trusted and decentralized network resource management. In: Proc. of the
29th Int’l Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks. Honolulu: IEEE, 2020. 1–7. [doi: 10.1109/ICCCN49398.2020.9209590]
[86] Angieri S, García-martínez A, Liu BY, Yan ZW, Wang C, Bagnulo M. A distributed autonomous organization for Internet address
management. IEEE Trans. on Engineering Management, 2020, 67(4): 1459–1475. [doi: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2924737]
[87] Angieri S, Bagnulo M, García-martínez A, Liu BY, Wei XP. InBlock4: Blockchain-based route origin validation. In: Proc. of the 2020
IEEE INFOCOM Conf. on Computer Communications Workshops. Toronto: IEEE, 2020. 291–296. [doi: 10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS
50562.2020.9162879]
[88] García-martínez A, Angieri S, Liu BY, Yang F, Bagnulo M. Design and implementation of InBlock—A distributed IP address registration
system. IEEE Systems Journal, 2021, 15(3): 3528–3539. [doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3003526]
[89] Lu HM, Tang Y, Sun Y. DRRS-BC: Decentralized routing registration system based on blockchain. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica
Sinica, 2021, 8(12): 1868–1876. [doi: 10.1109/JAS.2021.1004204]
[90] He GB, Su W, Gao S, Yue JR, Das SK. ROAchain: Securing route origin authorization with blockchain for inter-domain routing. IEEE
Trans. on Network and Service Management, 2021, 18(2): 1690–1705. [doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3015557]
[91] Saad M, Anwar A, Ahmad A, Alasmary H, Yuksel M, Mohaisen D. RouteChain: Towards blockchain-based secure and efficient BGP
routing. Computer Networks, 2022, 217: 109362. [doi: 10.1016/J.COMNET.2022.109362]

