Page 261 - 《软件学报》2025年第10期

4658 软件学报 2025 年第 36 卷第 10 期

Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conf. and Symp. on the Foundations of Software Engineering. Lake Buena Vista:
ACM, 2018. 739–743. [doi: 10.1145/3236024.3264835]
[4] Ma L, Zhang FY, Sun JY, Xue MH, Li B, Juefei-Xu F, Xie C, Li L, Liu Y, Zhao JJ, Wang YD. DeepMutation: Mutation testing of deep
learning systems. In: Proc. of the 29th IEEE Int’l Symp. on Software Reliability Engineering. Memphis: IEEE, 2018. 100–111. [doi: 10.
1109/ISSRE.2018.00021]
[5] Chen TY, Cheung SC, Yiu SM. Metamorphic testing: A new approach for generating next test cases. arXiv:2002.12543, 2020.
[6] Zhang MS, Zhang YQ, Zhang LM, Liu C, Khurshid S. DeepRoad: GAN-based metamorphic testing and input validation framework for
autonomous driving systems. In: Proc. of the 33rd IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Montpellier: ACM, 2018.
132–142. [doi: 10.1145/3238147.3238187]
[7] Li GP, Li YR, Jha S, Tsai T, Sullivan M, Hari SKS, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer RK. AV-FUZZER: Finding safety violations in autonomous
driving systems. In: Proc. of the 31st IEEE Int’l Symp. on Software Reliability Engineering. Coimbra: IEEE, 2020. 25–36. [doi: 10.1109/
ISSRE5003.2020.00012]
[8] Tian HX, Jiang Y, Wu GQ, Yan JR, Wei J, Chen W, Li S, Ye D. MOSAT: Finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using
multi-objective genetic algorithm. In: Proc. of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conf. and Symp. on the Foundations
of Software Engineering. Singapore: ACM, 2022. 94–106. [doi: 10.1145/3540250.3549100]
[9] Pang Q, Yuan YY, Wang S. MDPFuzz: Testing models solving Markov decision processes. In: Proc. of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT Int’l
Symp. on Software Testing and Analysis. ACM, 2022. 378–390. [doi: 10.1145/3533767.3534388]
[10] Sun ZY, Zhang JM, Harman M, Papadakis M, Zhang L. Automatic testing and improvement of machine translation. In: Proc. of the 42nd
IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. Seoul: IEEE, 2020. 974–985.
[11] Sun ZY, Zhang JM, Xiong YF, Harman M, Papadakis M, Zhang L. Improving machine translation systems via isotopic replacement. In:
Proc. of the 44th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. Pittsburgh: IEEE, 2022. 1181–1192. [doi: 10.1145/3510003.3510206]
[12] Chen SQ, Jin S, Xie XY. Testing your question answering software via asking recursively. In: Proc. of the 36th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on
Automated Software Engineering. Melbourne: IEEE, 2021. 104–116. [doi: 10.1109/ASE51524.2021.9678670]
[13] Shen QC, Chen JJ, Zhang JM, Wang HY, Liu S, Tian MH. Natural test generation for precise testing of question answering software. In:
Proc. of the 37th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Rochester: ACM, 2022. 71. [doi: 10.1145/3551349.
3556953]
[14] Liu ZX, Feng Y, Yin YN, Sun JY, Chen ZY, Xu BW. QATest: A uniform fuzzing framework for question answering systems. In: Proc.
of the 37th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Rochester: ACM, 2022. 81. [doi: 10.1145/3551349.3556929]
[15] Tian YC, Pei KX, Jana S, Ray B. DeepTest: Automated testing of deep-neural-network-driven autonomous cars. In: Proc. of the 40th
IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. Gothenburg: IEEE, 2018. 303–314. [doi: 10.1145/3180155.3180220]
[16] Zhou HS, Li W, Kong ZL, Guo JF, Zhang YQ, Yu B, Zhang L, Liu C. DeepBillboard: Systematic physical-world testing of autonomous
driving systems. In: Proc. of the 42nd IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. Seoul: IEEE, 2020. 347–358.
[17] Gambi A, Mueller M, Fraser G. AsFault: Testing self-driving car software using search-based procedural content generation. In: Proc. of
the 41st IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering: Companion Proc. Montreal: IEEE, 2019. 27–30. [doi: 10.1109/ICSE-
Companion.2019.00030]
[18] Abdessalem RB, Panichella A, Nejati S, Briand LC, Stifter T. Testing autonomous cars for feature interaction failures using many-
objective search. In: Proc. of the 33rd IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Montpellier: IEEE, 2018. 143–154.
[doi: 10.1145/3238147.3238192]
[19] Huang SH, Papernot N, Goodfellow IJ, Duan Y, Abbeel P. Adversarial attacks on neural network policies. In: Proc. of the 5th Int’l Conf.
on Learning Representations. Toulon: OpenReview.net, 2017.
[20] Lee XY, Ghadai S, Tan KL, Hegde C, Sarkar S. Spatiotemporally constrained action space attacks on deep reinforcement learning agents.
In: Proc. of the 34th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. New York: AAAI, 2020. 4577–4584. [doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5887]
[21] Gleave A, Dennis M, Wild C, Kant N, Levine S, Russell S. Adversarial policies: Attacking deep reinforcement learning. In: Proc. of the
8th Int’l Conf. on Learning Representations. Addis Ababa: OpenReview.net, 2020.
[22] Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Graves A, Antonoglou I, Wierstra D, Riedmiller M. Playing Atari with deep reinforcement learning.
arXiv:1312.5602, 2013.
[23] Mnih V, Badia AP, Mirza M, Graves A, Lillicrap T, Harley T, Silver D, Kavukcuoglu K. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement
learning. In: Proc. of the 33rd Int’l Conf. on Machine Learning. New York City: JMLR, 2016. 1928–1937.
[24] Schulman J, Wolski F, Dhariwal P, Radford A, Klimov O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv:1707.06347, 2017.
[25] Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, et al. Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 2016, 529(7587):
484–489. [doi: 10.1038/nature16961]
[26] Berner C, Brockman G, Chan B, et al. Dota 2 with large scale deep reinforcement learning. arXiv:1912.06680, 2019.
[27] Kober J, Bagnell JA, Peters J. Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey. The Int’l Journal of Robotics Research, 2013, 32(11):
1238–1274. [doi: 10.1177/0278364913495721]