Page 69 - 《软件学报》2025年第8期
P. 69

3492                                                       软件学报  2025  年第  36  卷第  8  期


                  [8]  Cropper A, Muggleton SH. Logical minimisation of meta-rules within meta-interpretive learning. In: Proc. of the 24th Int’l Conf. on
                     Inductive Logic Programming. Nancy: Springer, 2015. 62–75. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23708-4_5]
                  [9]  Cropper A, Tourret S. Derivation reduction of metarules in meta-interpretive learning. In: Proc. of 28th Int’l Conf. on Inductive Logic
                     Programming. Ferrara: Springer, 2018. 1–21. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99960-9_1]
                 [10]  Morel R, Cropper A, Ong CHL. Typed meta-interpretive learning of logic programs. In: Proc. of the 16th European Conf. on Logics in
                     Artificial Intelligence. Rende: Springer, 2019. 198–213. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_13]
                 [11]  Hocquette C. Efficient instance and hypothesis space revision in meta-interpretive learning [Ph.D. Thesis]. London: Imperial College
                     London, 2022. [doi: 10.25560/97356]
                 [12]  Cyrus  D,  Milani  GA,  Tamaddoni-Nezhad  A.  Explainable  game  strategy  rule  learning  from  video.  In:  Proc.  of  the  17th  Int’l  Rule
                     Challenge and 7th Doctoral Consortium @ RuleML+RR 2023 co-located with 19th Reasoning Web Summer School (RW 2023) and 15th
                     DecisionCAMP 2023 as part of Declarative AI 2023. 2023.
                 [13]  Cyrus D, Trewern J, Tamaddoni-Nezhad A. Meta-interpretive learning from fractal images. In: Proc. of the 32nd Int’l Conf. on Inductive
                     Logic Programming. Bari: Springer, 2023. 166–174. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-49299-0_12]
                 [14]  Muggleton SH, Santos JCA, Tamaddoni-Nezhad A. TopLog: ILP using a logic program declarative bias. In: Proc. of the 24th Int’l Conf.
                     on Logic Programming. Springer, 2008. 687–692. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-89982-2_58]
                 [15]  Muggleton SH, Lin DH, Tamaddoni-Nezhad A. Meta-interpretive learning of higher-order dyadic Datalog: Predicate invention revisited.
                     Machine Learning, 2015, 100(1): 49–73. [doi: 10.1007/s10994-014-5471-y]
                 [16]  Tourret S, Cropper A. SLD-resolution reduction of second-order Horn fragments. In: Proc. of the 16th European Conf. on Logics in
                     Artificial Intelligence. Rende: Springer, 259–276. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_17]
                 [17]  Gallier JH. Logic for Computer Science: Foundations of Automatic Theorem Proving. 2nd ed., New York: Dover Publications Inc., 2015.
                 [18]  Nienhuys-Cheng SH, Wolf R. Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming. Berlin: Springer, 1997. [doi: 10.1007/3-540-62927-0]
                 [19]  Cropper A, Muggleton SH. Learning efficient logic programs. Machine Learning, 2019, 108(7): 1063–1083. [doi: 10.1007/s10994-018-
                     5712-6]
                 [20]  Cropper A, Morel R, Muggleton SH. Learning higher-order programs through predicate invention. In: Proc. of the 34th AAAI Conf. on
                     Artificial Intelligence. New York: AAAI Press, 2020. 13655–13658. [doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7113]
                 [21]  Cropper A, Muggleton SH. Learning higher-order logic programs through abstraction and invention. In: Proc. of the 25th Int’l Joint Conf.
                     on Artificial Intelligence. New York: AAAI Press, 2016.
                 [22]  Muggleton S, Buntine W. Machine invention of first-order predicates by inverting resolution. In: Proc. of the 5th Int’l Conf. on Machine
                     Learning. Ann Arbor: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988. 339–352. [doi: 10.1016/b978-0-934613-64-4.50040-2]
                 [23]  Muggleton S, Feng C. Efficient induction of logic programs. In: Proc. of the 1990 Int’l Conf. on Algorithmic Learning Theory. Tokyo:
                     Springer, 1990. 368–381.
                 [24]  Muggleton S. Duce, an Oracle-based approach to constructive induction. In: Proc. of the 10th Int’l Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.
                     Milan: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1987. 287–292.
                 [25]  Rouveirol C, Puget JF. Beyond inversion of resolution. In: Proc. of the 7th Int’l Conf. Austin: Morgan Kaufmann, 1990. 122–130. [doi:
                     10.1016/b978-1-55860-141-3.50018-3]
                 [26]  Lavrač N, Džeroski S, Grobelnik M. Learning nonrecursive definitions of relations with Linus. In: Proc. of the 1991 European Working
                     Session on Learning on Machine Learning. Porto: Springer, 1991. 265–281. [doi: 10.1007/bfb0017020]
                 [27]  De Raedt L, Bruynooghe M. CLINT: A multi-strategy interactive concept-learner and theory revision system. In: Proc. of the 1st Int’l
                     Workshop on Multi-strategy Learning Workshop. Virginia, 1991. 175–191.
                 [28]  Cropper A, Tamaddoni-Nezhad A, Muggleton SH. Meta-interpretive learning of data transformation programs. In: Proc. of the 25th Int’l
                     Conf. on Inductive Logic Programming. Kyoto: Springer, 2016. 46–59. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40566-7_4]
                 [29]  Cropper A, Hocquette C. Learning logic programs by discovering where not to search. In: Proc. of the 37th AAAI Conf. on Artificial
                     Intelligence. Washington: AAAI Press, 2023. 6289–6296. [doi: 10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25774]
                 [30]  Cropper A, Muggleton SH. Learning efficient logical robot strategies involving composable objects. In: Proc. of the 24th Int’l Conf. on
                     Artificial Intelligence. Buenos Aires: AAAI Press, 2015. 3423–3429.
                 [31]  Kazmi M, Schüller P, Saygın Y. Improving scalability of inductive logic programming via pruning and best-effort optimisation. Expert
                     Systems with Applications, 2017, 87: 291–303. [doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.013]
                 [32]  Kaminski  T,  Eiter  T,  Inoue  K.  Meta-interpretive  learning  using  HEX-programs.  In:  Proc.  of  the  28th  Int’l  Joint  Conf.  on  Artificial
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74