Page 162 - 《爆炸与冲击》2026年第6期

第 46 卷 周志刚，等： 基于结构感知变分光流法的BOS冲击波超压非接触式测量 第 6 期

imaging [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2009, 46(3): 467–476. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-008-0572-7.
[29] SCHMIDT B E, WOIKE M R. Wavelet-based optical flow analysis for background-oriented schlieren image processing [J].
AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(8): 3209–3216. DOI: 10.2514/1.J060218.
[30] RAJENDRAN L K, BANE S P M, VLACHOS P P. Dot tracking methodology for background-oriented schlieren (BOS) [J].
Experiments in Fluids, 2019, 60(11): 162. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-019-2793-3.
[31] HORN B K P, SCHUNCK B G. Determining optical flow [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1981, 17(1/2/3): 185–203. DOI: 10.
1016/0004-3702(81)90024-2.
[32] MARTÍNEZ-GONZALEZ A, MORENO-HERNANDEZ D, GUERRERO-VIRAMONTES J A. Measurement of temperature
and velocity fields in a convective fluid flow in air using schlieren images [J]. Applied Optics, 2013, 52(22): 5562–5569. DOI:
10.1364/ao.52.005562.
[33] FU S, WU Y J. Detection of velocity distribution of a flow field using sequences of schlieren images [J]. Optical Engineering,
2001, 40(8): 1661–1666. DOI: 10.1117/1.1386792.
[34] SUTER D. Motion estimation and vector splines [C]//Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition. Seattle: IEEE, 1994: 939–942. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.1994.323929.
[35] CORPETTI T, HEITZ D, ARROYO G, et al. Fluid experimental flow estimation based on an optical-flow scheme [J].
Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 40(1): 80–97. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-005-0048-y.
[36] FARNEBÄCK G. Two-frame motion estimation based on polynomial expansion [C]//Proceedings of the 13th Scandinavian
Conference on Image Analysis. Halmstad: Springer, 2003: 363–370. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45103-X_50.
[37] ZACH C, POCK T, BISCHOF H. A duality based approach for realtime TV-L optical flow [C]//Proceedings of the 29th
1
DAGM Symposium on Pattern Recognition. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 214–223. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74936-3_22.
[38] BROX T, BRUHN A, PAPENBERG N, et al. High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping [C]//
Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Computer Vision. Prague: Springer, 2004: 25–36. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-
24673-2_3.
[39] XUE T F, RUBINSTEIN M, WADHWA N, et al. Refraction wiggles for measuring fluid depth and velocity from video [C]//
Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Vision. Zurich: Springer, 2014: 767–782. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-
319-10578-9_50.
[40] LIU T S. OpenOpticalFlow: an open source program for extraction of velocity fields from flow visualization images [J].
Journal of Open Research Software, 2017, 5(1): 29. DOI: 10.5334/jors.168.
[41] MCLEAN D. Continuum fluid mechanics and the Navier-Stokes equations [M]//MCLEAN D. Understanding Aerodynamics:
Arguing from the Real Physics. Boeing, 2012: 13–78. DOI: 10.1002/9781118454190.ch3.
[42] IPPEN E P, SHANK C V. Techniques for measurement [M]//SHAPIRO S L. Ultrashort Light Pulses: Picosecond Techniques
and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 83–122. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-13493-X_17.
[43] BRUHN A, WEICKERT J, SCHNÖRR C. Lucas/Kanade meets Horn/Schunck: combining local and global optic flow
methods [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2005, 61(3): 211–231. DOI: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000045324.43199.43.
[44] HALEEM B A, EL AGHOURY I M, TORK B S. An overview of iterative techniques used for solving the systems of
equations resulting from the finite element analysis [J]. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 48–
57. DOI: 10.9790/1684-1705024857.
[45] SUN D Q, ROTH S, BLACK M J. A quantitative analysis of current practices in optical flow estimation and the principles
behind them [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2014, 106(2): 115–137. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-013-0644-x.
[46] DEWEY J M. Measurement of the physical properties of blast waves [M]//IGRA O, SEILER F. Experimental Methods of
Shock Wave Research. Cham: Springer, 2015: 53–86. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23745-9_2.
[47] KREHL P O K. The classical Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions: an important cornerstone of modern shock wave physics—
ideal assumptions vs. reality [J]. The European Physical Journal H, 2015, 40(2): 159–204 . DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2015-50010-4.
(责任编辑 曾月蓉)

061431-16