Page 79 - 《软件学报》2026年第7期
P. 79
2764 软件学报 2026 年第 37 卷第 7 期
[79] Guerrouj L, Azad S, Rigby PC. The influence of App churn on App success and StackOverflow discussions. In: Proc. of the 22nd IEEE
Int’l Conf. on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER 2015). Montreal: IEEE, 2015. 321–330. [doi: 10.1109/SANER.
2015.7081842]
[80] Jiang J, Miao M, Zhao LX, Zhang L. Prediction method for question deletion in software question and answer community. Ruan Jian
Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2022, 33(5): 1699–1710 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.jos.org.cn/1000-9825/6556.htm
[doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006556]
[81] Wang W, Godfrey MW. Detecting API usage obstacles: A study of iOS and Android developer questions. In: Proc. of the 10th Working
Conf. on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2013). San Francisco: IEEE, 2013. 61–64. [doi: 10.1109/MSR.2013.6624006]
[82] Azad S, Rigby PC, Guerrouj L. Generating API call rules from version history and Stack Overflow posts. ACM Trans. on Software
Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 2017, 25(4): 29. [doi: 10.1145/2990497]
[83] Treude C, Robillard MP. Augmenting API documentation with insights from Stack Overflow. In: Proc. of the 38th Int’l Conf. on
Software Engineering (ICSE 2016). Austin: IEEE, 2016. 392–403. [doi: 10.1145/2884781.2884800]
[84] Toma TR, Grewal B, Bezemer CP. Answering user questions about machine learning models through standardized model cards. In:
Proc. of the 47th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE 2025). Ottawa: IEEE, 2025. 1488–1500. [doi: 10.1109/
ICSE55347.2025.00066]
[85] Black S, Harrison R, Baldwin M. A survey of social media use in software systems development. In: Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Web 2.0
for Software Engineering. Cape Town: ACM, 2010. 1–5. [doi: 10.1145/1809198.1809200]
[86] Bougie G, Starke J, Storey MA, German DM. Towards understanding Twitter use in software engineering: Preliminary findings,
ongoing challenges and future questions. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Workshop on Web 2.0 for Software Engineering. Waikiki:
ACM, 2011. 31–36. [doi: 10.1145/1984701.1984707]
[87] Singer L, Filho FF, Storey MA. Software engineering at the speed of light: How developers stay current using Twitter. In: Proc. of the
36th Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE 2014). Hyderabad: ACM, 2014. 211–221. [doi: 10.1145/2568225.2568305]
[88] Elsner M, Charniak E. Disentangling chat with local coherence models. In: Proc. of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for
Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Portland: ACL, 2011. 1179–1189.
[89] Panichella S, Bavota G, Di Penta M, Canfora G, Antoniol G. How developers’ collaborations identified from different sources tell us
about code changes. In: Proc. of the 2014 IEEE Int’l Conf. on Software Maintenance and Evolution. Victoria: IEEE, 2014. 251–260.
[doi: 10.1109/ICSME.2014.47]
[90] Yu LG, Ramaswamy S, Mishra A, Mishra D. Communications in global software development: An empirical study using GTK+ OSS
repository. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2011 Workshops. LNCS 7046, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
218–227. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25126-9_32]
[91] Chatterjee P, Damevski K, Kraft NA, Pollock L. Software-related slack chats with disentangled conversations. In: Proc. of the 17th Int’l
Conf. on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2020). Seoul: ACM, 2020. 588–592. [doi: 10.1145/3379597.3387493]
[92] Wang D, Kondo M, Kamei Y, Kula RG, Ubayashi N. When conversations turn into work: A taxonomy of converted discussions and
issues in GitHub. Empirical Software Engineering, 2023, 28(6): 138. [doi: 10.1007/s10664-023-10366-z]
[93] Lima M, Steinmacher I, Ford D, Liu E, Vorreuter G, Conte T, Gadelha B. Looking for related posts on GitHub discussions. PeerJ
Computer Science, 2023, 9: e1567. [doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1567]
[94] Choi F, Bajpai T, Pratipati S, Chandrasekharan E. ConvEx: A visual conversation exploration system for Discord moderators. Proc. of
the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, 2023, 7(CSCW2): 262. [doi: 10.1145/3610053]
[95] Licina E, Tchappi I, Schommer CR, Najjar A. Optimizing helpdesk ticketing systems with Discord community integration. In: Proc. of
the 12th Int’l Conf. on Human-agent Interaction. Swansea: ACM, 2024. 373–375. [doi: 10.1145/3687272.3690886]
[96] Wath V, Deogade V, Vyawahare Y, Loya G, Chakole M, Dubey Y. Enhancing user interaction on Discord with multimodal generative
AI. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Medical Sciences (ICETEMS 2024). Nagpur: IEEE, 2024.
845–849. [doi: 10.1109/ICETEMS64039.2024.10965067]
[97] Kim D, Lee MJ, Ki W, Kim D. Exploring the role of user-driven communities in NFT valuation: A case study of Discord. Journal of
Multimedia Information System, 2022, 9(4): 299–314. [doi: 10.33851/JMIS.2022.9.4.299]
[98] Yoon J, Zhang AX, Seering J. “It’s great because it’s ran by us”: Empowering teen volunteer Discord moderators to design healthy and
engaging youth-led online communities. Proc. of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, 2025, 9(2): CSCW121. [doi: 10.1145/
3711114]
[99] AlGhamdi R. Bridging learning gaps through Discord: Peer-to-peer learning in computer graphics education. Learning and Teaching in
Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 2025, 19(1): 49–65. [doi: 10.1108/LTHE-12-2024-0001]

