Page 337 - 《软件学报》2026年第6期
P. 337

2656                                                       软件学报  2026  年第  37  卷第  6  期


                 向-后向安全性. 根据密钥隔离签名的安全模型, 我们基于随机预言机模型证明了我们的方案符合前向-后向安全
                 性和不可伪造性. 理论分析和实验证明了本文提出的方案具有很高的实用性.

                 References
                  [1]   Yum  DH,  Lee  PJ.  Identity-based  cryptography  in  public  key  management.  In:  Proc.  of  the  1st  European  Public  Key  Infrastructure
                     Workshop. Samos Island: Springer, 2004. 71–84. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-25980-0_6]
                  [2]   Shamir A. Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes. In: Proc. of the 1985 Advances in Cryptology. Berlin: Springer, 1985.
                     47–53. [doi: 10.1007/3-540-39568-7_5]
                  [3]   Wang JN, Zhu B, Yu WX, Wang W, Hu FL. Side channel analysis attack based on deep learning LSTM. Computer Engineering, 2021,
                     47(10): 140–146 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0059210]
                  [4]   Peng  P,  Zhang  ML,  Zheng  D.  Side  channel  attack  fused  with  CNN-LSTM.  Computer  Engineering  and  Applications,  2023,  59(6):
                     268–276 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2111-0511]
                  [5]   Shamir A. How to share a secret. Communications of the ACM, 1979, 22(11): 612–613. [doi: 10.1145/359168.359176]
                  [6]   Desmedt  Y,  Frankel  Y.  Threshold  cryptosystems.  In:  Proc.  of  the  1990  Annual  Int’l  Cryptology  Conf.  New  York:  Springer,  1990.
                     307–315. [doi: 10.1007/0-387-34805-0_28]
                  [7]   Anderson R. Two remarks on public key cryptology. Technical Report, UCAM-CL-TR-549. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 2002.
                     [doi: 10.48456/tr-549]
                  [8]   Bellare M, Miner SK. A forward-secure digital signature scheme. In: Proc. of the 19th Annual Int’l Cryptology Conf. on Advances in
                     Cryptology. Santa Barbara: Springer, 1999. 431–448. [doi: 10.1007/3-540-48405-1_28]
                  [9]   Dodis  Y,  Katz  J,  Xu  SH,  Yung  M.  Key-insulated  public  key  cryptosystems.  In:  Proc.  of  the  2002  Advances  in  Cryptology —
                     EUROCRYPT. Amsterdam: Springer, 2002. 65–82. [doi: 10.1007/3-540-46035-7_5]
                 [10]   Cheng ZH. The SM9 cryptographic schemes. 2017. https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/117.pdf
                 [11]   Dodis Y, Katz J, Xu SH, Yung M. Strong key-insulated signature schemes. In: Proc. of the 6th Int’l Workshop on Practice and Theory in
                     Public Key Cryptography. Miami: Springer, 2002. 130–144. [doi: 10.1007/3-540-36288-6_10]
                 [12]   Yum DH, Lee PJ. Efficient key updating signature schemes based on IBS. In: Proc. of the 9th IMA Int’l Conf. on Cryptography and
                     Coding. Cirencester: Springer, 2003. 167–182. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-40974-8_14]
                 [13]   Zhou Y, Cao ZF, Chai ZC. Identity based key insulated signature. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Information Security Practice and
                     Experience. Hangzhou: Springer, 2006. 226–234. [doi: 10.1007/11689522_21]
                 [14]   Weng J, Liu SL, Chen KF, Li XX. Identity-based key-insulated signature with secure key-updates. In: Proc. of the 2nd SKLOIS Conf. on
                     Information Security and Cryptology. Beijing: Springer, 2006. 13–26. [doi: 10.1007/11937807_2]
                 [15]   Hanaoka  G,  Hanaoka  Y,  Imai  H.  Parallel  key-insulated  public  key  encryption.  In:  Proc.  of  the  2006  Int’l  Workshop  on  Public  Key
                     Cryptography. New York: Springer, 2006. 105–122. [doi: 10.1007/11745853_8]
                 [16]   Chen JH, Long Y, Chen KF, Guo J. Attribute-based key-insulated signature and its applications. Information Sciences, 2014, 275: 57–67.
                     [doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.021]
                 [17]   Yu J, Wang HQ. Strong key-exposure resilient auditing for secure cloud storage. IEEE Trans. on Information Forensics and Security,
                     2017, 12(8): 1931–1940. [doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2695449]
                 [18]   Vasudeva  Reddy  P,  Gopal  PVSSN.  Identity-based  key-insulated  aggregate  signature  scheme.  Journal  of  King  Saud  University —
                     Computer and Information Sciences, 2017, 29(3): 303–310. [doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2015.09.003]
                 [19]   Shen WT, Yu J, Yang M, Hu JK. Efficient identity-based data integrity auditing with key-exposure resistance for cloud storage. IEEE
                     Trans. on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2023, 20(6): 4593–4606. [doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2022.3228699]
                 [20]   An RC, Wang HQ. Proxy provable data possession with key-exposure resilient. Computer Science, 2024, 51(12): 310–316 (in Chinese
                     with English abstract). [doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.231100085]
                 [21]   Cheng  ZH.  Security  analysis  of  SM9  key  agreement  and  encryption.  In:  Proc.  of  the  14th  Int’l  Conf.  on  Information  Security  and
                     Cryptology. Fuzhou: Springer, 2018. 3–25. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14234-6_1]
                 [22]   Lai JC, Huang XY, He DB, Wu W. Security analysis of SM9 digital signature and key encapsulation. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2021,
                     51(11): 1900–1913 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.1360/SSI-2021-0049]
                 [23]   Lai JC, Huang XY, He DB. An efficient identity-based broadcast encryption scheme based on SM9. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2021,
                     44(5): 897–907 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.11897/SP.T.1016.2021.00897]
                 [24]   Tang F, Ling GW, Shan JY. Additive homomorphic encryption schemes based on SM2 and SM9. Journal of Cryptologic Research, 2022,
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342