Page 284 - 《高原气象》2026年第2期
P. 284

高     原      气     象                                 45 卷
              584





                         Study on X-band Dual Polarization Radar Echo Attenuation

                                  Correction Based on Transformer Architecture


                               ZHANG Yuankang , HU Zhiqun , ZHENG Jiafeng , WANG Lirong    4
                                                1, 2
                                                             2
                                                                             3
                     (1. College of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, Sichuan, China;
                            2. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Weather Science and Technology, CAMS, Beijing 100081, China;
                      3. College of Electronic Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, Sichuan, China;
                  4. Hebei Provincial Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Environmental Meteorology Center, Shijiazhuang 050021, Hebei, China)

             Abstract: Attenuation effects in X-band weather radar significantly constrain its detection accuracy. Traditional
             attenuation correction methods typically rely on empirical formulas with limited parameters and poor generaliza‐
             tion capability, leading to significant uncertainty in the correction results. In recent years, deep learning algo‐
             rithm with powerful nonlinear fitting capacity has emerged as a promising technical approach to overcome the
             limitations of conventional methods. Based on the Transformer's underlying framework, this study develops an
             X-band radar attenuation correction architecture named as XCORnet. Utilizing the observational data from the up‐
             graded polarimetric S-band Next Generation Weather Radar (CINRAD/SAD) at Beijing Daxing in 2023 -2024
             flood season as truth, the horizontal reflectivity (Z ) and differential reflectivity (Z ) measurements in corre‐
                                                                                      DR
                                                          H
             sponding range bins from the Beijing Fangshan X-band dual-polarization radar (XPOL) are spatially and tempo‐
             rally matched. These matched XPOL observations of Z , Z  along with specific differential phase (K ) are in‐
                                                                                                     DP
                                                                DR
                                                             H
             corporated to construct the AI training dataset, in which 2642624 samples for Z  and 2605583 samples for Z ,
                                                                                  H
                                                                                                           DR
             respectively. The dataset is partitioned with 80% for training and 20% for testing. Within the XCORnet frame‐
             work, the models with K  as the primary feature input for Z  and Z  attenuation correction are trained, respec‐
                                                                  H
                                   DP
                                                                        DR
             tively. And then, two XCORnet-based models are evaluated by means of the test set. The results demonstrate that
             the AI-based  model  outperforms  traditional  methods  significantly. For  Z   correction,  the  ratio  bias (BIAS)  of
                                                                             H
             XPOL to SAD are from original 0. 875 to model-based correction 0. 972, surpassing the empirical formula-based
             0. 901. The root mean square error (RMSE) are reduced from original 8. 693 to model-based 5. 811 dB with a
             33. 15% improvement, whereas the empirical formula only reduced it to 6. 820 dB (with a 21. 54% improve‐
             ment). For Z  correction, the BIAS are from original 0. 862 to model-based 1. 141, outperforming the over-cor‐
                         DR
             rection of empirical formula-based (1. 273). The RMSE decreased from original 1. 679 to model-based 0. 972 dB
             (with  a  42. 10%  improvement),  compared  to  the  empirical  formula-based  reduction  only  1. 382  dB (with  a
             17. 69% improvement). For Z  correction, the mean absolute error (MAE) improves from 6. 292 to 4. 222 dB
                                        H
             (with a 32. 89% improvement), whereas the empirical formula only reduces it to 5. 113 dBZ (with a 18. 73%
             improvement). For Z  correction, the MAE decreases from original 1. 271 to model-based 0. 697 dB (with a
                                DR
             45. 16% improvement), compared to the empirical formula-based reduction only to 1. 008 dB (with a 20. 69%
             improvement). The MAE with model correction also showed distinct advantages over that with traditional meth‐
             ods. Three cases further validate the stability and generalization capability of AI-based correction.
             Key words: X-band dual-polarization radar; attenuation correction; deep learning; Transformer architecture
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289