Page 118 - 《软件学报》2026年第7期
P. 118
胡帅 等: 产业研发视角下的开源软件供应链攻击问题研究 2803
[123] Dong T, Xue MH, Chen GX, Holland R, Meng Y, Li SF, Liu Z, Zhu HJ. The philosopher’s stone: Trojaning plugins of large language
models. In: Proc. of the 32nd Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symp. San Diego: The Internet Society, 2025.
[124] Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Advanced persistent threat compromise of government agencies, critical
infrastructure, and private sector organizations. 2021. https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa20-352a
[125] Lakshmanan R. Critical open VSX registry flaw exposes millions of developers to supply chain attacks. 2025. https://thehackernews.com/
2025/06/critical-open-vsx-registry-flaw-exposes.html
[126] GitHub. Oneinstack issue #487. 2023 (in Chinese). https://github.com/oneinstack/oneinstack/issues/487
[127] ThreatLabz. Anatomy of an ongoing drive-by-download campaign. 2013. https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/security-research/anatomy-
ongoing-drive-download-campaign
[128] Mandiant. North Korea leverages SaaS provider in a targeted supply chain attack. 2023. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-
intelligence/north-korea-supply-chain
[129] Zanki K. Malware leveraging public infrastructure like GitHub on the rise. 2023. https://www.reversinglabs.com/blog/malware-
leveraging-public-infrastructure-like-github-on-the-rise
[130] Ranjan I, Agnihotri RB. Ambiguity in cloud security with malware-injection attack. In: Proc. of the 3rd Int’l Conf. on Electronics,
Communication and Aerospace Technology. Coimbatore: IEEE, 2019. 306–310. [doi: 10.1109/ICECA.2019.8821844]
[131] Damjanović DZ. Malicious code in the cloud. Vojnotehnički Glasnik, 2022, 70(3): 734–755. [doi: 10.5937/vojtehg70-37168]
[132] Rao BVS, Sharma V, Rathore N, Prasad D, Anandaram H, Soni G. A secure framework to prevent three-tier cloud architecture from
malicious malware injection attacks. Int’l Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing, 2023, 13(1): 1–22. [doi: 10.4018/ijcac.317220]
[133] Alibaba Cloud. PyPi supply chain poisoning series incidents: Discord assists hacker attacks. 2021 (in Chinese). https://developer.
aliyun.com/article/787142/
[134] Zanki K. Update: IconBurst npm software supply chain attack grabs data from Apps and websites. 2025. https://www.reversinglabs.
com/blog/iconburst-npm-software-supply-chain-attack-grabs-data-from-apps-websites
[135] Snyk Research Team. Malicious package in @yandex-travel/ui. 2025. https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-YANDEXTRAVELUI-
3319915
[136] National Institute of Standards and Technology. CVE-2023-45311 detail. 2025. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45311
[137] OneinStack. Malicious code found in domestic mirrors of mirrors.oneinstack.com. 2025 (in Chinese). https://github.com/oneinstack/
oneinstack/issues/511
[138] Antiy Labs. Analysis of espionage trojan propagation attacks via GitHub. 2024 (in Chinese). https://www.freebuf.com/articles/network/
395369.html
[139] Qi'anxin CodeGuard. Software supply chain poisoning—Analysis of malicious NPM packages (Part 2). 2024 (in Chinese). https://www.
freebuf.com/articles/database/395549.html
[140] Xmirror Security Intelligence Center. Malicious NPM Package (fix-this) launches reverse shell remote control poisoning. 2025 (in
Chinese). https://www.xmirror.cn/particulars?id=3225&type=dt
[141] Fiedler M. Malware distribution and domain abuse. 2025. https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2024-04-10-domain-abuse/
[142] Xmirror Security Monthly Report. Release of open-source supply chain poisoning monthly report April 2024. 2024 (in Chinese). https://
opensca.xmirror.cn/resources/particulars?id=143
[143] Xmirror Security Intelligence Center (Supply Chain Poisoning Warning). Malicious Python package disguised as HTTP component
launches CStealer espionage backdoor attack. 2024 (in Chinese). https://www.freebuf.com/news/400487.html
[144] Huorong Security. GitHub open-source projects poisoned: Backdoor viruses spread along with development processes. 2025 (in
Chinese). https://huorong.cn/document/tech/vir_report/1802/
[145] Sonatype. State of the software supply chain. 2025. https://www.sonatype.com/state-of-the-software-supply-chain/Introduction
[146] Prates L, Pereira R. DevSecOps practices and tools. Int’l Journal of Information Security, 2025, 24(1): 11. [doi: 10.1007/s10207-024-
00914-z]
[147] Froh FN, Gobbi MF, Kinder J. Differential static analysis for detecting malicious updates to open source packages. In: Proc. of the 2023
Workshop on Software Supply Chain Offensive Research and Ecosystem Defenses. Copenhagen: ACM, 2023. 41–49. [doi: 10.1145/
3605770.3625211]
[148] Zheng XY, Wei C, Wang SN, Zhao YJ, Gao PM, Zhang YC, Wang KL, Wang HY. Towards robust detection of open source software
supply chain poisoning attacks in industry environments. In: Proc. of the 39th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software
Engineering. Sacramento: ACM, 2024. 1990–2001. [doi: 10.1145/3691620.3695262]
[149] Shariffdeen R, Hassanshahi B, Mirchev M, El Husseini A, Roychoudhury A. Detecting Python malware in the software supply chain

