Page 411 - 《软件学报》2026年第4期
P. 411
1852 软件学报 2026 年第 37 卷第 4 期
[2] King S, Nadal S. PPCoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake. 2012. https://people.cs.georgetown.edu/~clay/classes/
fall2017/835/papers/peercoin-paper.pdf
[3] Kaur M, Khan MZ, Gupta S, Noorwali A, Chakraborty C, Pani SK. MBCP: Performance analysis of large scale mainstream blockchain
consensus protocols. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 80931–80944. [doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085187]
[4] Zhang L, Li QW. Research on consensus efficiency based on practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proc. of the 10th Int’l Conf. on
Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC). Guiyang: IEEE, 2018. 1–6. [doi: 10.1109/ICMIC.2018.8529940]
[5] Fu X, Wang HM, Shi PC, Ouyang X, Zhang XH. Jointgraph: A DAG-based efficient consensus algorithm for consortium blockchains.
Software: Practice and Experience, 2021, 51(10): 1987–1999. [doi: 10.1002/spe.2748]
[6] Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/bitcoin/
[7] Miller A, Xia Y, Croman K, Shi E, Song D. The honey badger of BFT protocols. In: Proc. of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conf. on Computer
and Communications Security. Vienna: ACM, 2016. 31–42. [doi: 10.1145/2976749.2978399]
[8] Pass R, Shi E. Hybrid consensus: Efficient consensus in the permissionless model. 2016. https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/917.pdf
[9] Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Yu S. Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its
optimal design. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 275(2): 580–598. [doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.052]
[10] Wu J, Bi J, Li X, Ren G, Xu K, Williams M. RFC 5210: A source address validation architecture (SAVA) testbed and deployment
experience. 2008. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5210 [doi: 10.17487/RFC5210]
[11] Li D, Qin LC, Wu JP, Su YY, Xu MW, Shi XG, Gu YN, Lin T. Internet source address verification method based on synchronization and
dynamic filtering in address domain. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(10): 21–28 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.
11959/j.issn.1000-0801.2020289]
[12] de la Rocha Gómez-Arevalillo A, Papadimitratos P. Blockchain-based public key infrastructure for inter-domain secure routing. In: Proc.
of the 2017 Int’l Workshop on Open Problems in Network Security (iNetSec). 2017. 20–38.
[13] Xing QQ, Wang BS, Wang XF. BGPcoin: Blockchain-based Internet number resource authority and BGP security solution. Symmetry,
2018, 10(9): 408. [doi: 10.3390/sym10090408]
[14] He GB, Su W, Gao S, Yue JR, Das SK. ROAchain: Securing route origin authorization with blockchain for inter-domain routing. IEEE
Trans. on Network and Service Management, 2021, 18(2): 1690–1705. [doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3015557]
[15] Li J, Cao JH, Yang Y, Liu ZT, Li Q, Wang YY, Meng ZL, Xie RJ, Xu MW. DeBGP: Decentralized and efficient BGP hijacking
prevention system. In: Proc. of the 2023 Int’l Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN). 2023. 24–26.
[16] Saad M, Anwar A, Ahmad A, Alasmary H, Yuksel M, Mohaisen D. RouteChain: Towards blockchain-based secure and efficient BGP
routing. Computer Networks, 2022, 217: 109362. [doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109362]
[17] Lamport L. Paxos made simple. 2001. https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/paxos-simple.pdf
[18] Lamport L. Generalized consensus and Paxos. Technical Report, MSR-TR-2005-33, Microsoft, 2005. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/
research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/tr-2005-33.pdf?msockid=18e24034efce61972d8d50a1ebce67e1
[19] Lamport L. Fast paxos. Distributed Computing, 2006, 19(2): 79–103. [doi: 10.1007/s00446-006-0005-x]
[20] Ongaro D, Ousterhout J. In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. In: Proc. of the 2014 USENIX Annual Technical Conf.
Philadelphia: USENIX Association, 2014. 305–319.
[21] Castro M, Liskov B. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proc. of the 3rd Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation.
New Orleans: USENIX Association, 1999. 173–186.
[22] Li Q, Xu MW, Wu JP, Zhang XW, Lee PPC, Xu K. Enhancing the trust of Internet routing with lightweight route attestation. In: Proc. of
the 6th ACM Symp. on Information, Computer and Communications Security. Hong Kong: ACM, 2011. 92–101. [doi: 10.1145/1966913.
1966927]
[23] Li Q, Hu YC, Zhang XW. Even rockets cannot make pigs fly sustainably: Can BGP be secured with BGPsec. In: Proc. of the 2014
Workshop on Security of Emerging Networking Technologies. San Diego, 2014.
[24] Cao JM, Liu Y, Liu MX, He L, Jia YH, Yang F. pSAV: A practical and decentralized inter-as source address validation service
framework. In: Proc. of the 29th IEEE/ACM Int’l Symp. on Quality of Service (IWQOS). Tokyo: IEEE, 2021. 1–7. [doi: 10.1109/
IWQOS52092.2021.9521336]
[25] Yang XY, Cao JH, Xu MW. SEC: Secure, efficient, and compatible source address validation with packet tags. In: Proc. of the 39th IEEE
Int’l Performance Computing and Communications Conf. (IPCCC). Austin: IEEE, 2020. 1–8. [doi: 10.1109/IPCCC50635.2020.9391554]
[26] Qin LC, Liu LB, Chen L, Li D, Shi YQ, Yang HB. UniSAV: A unified framework for Internet-scale source address validation. In: Proc.
of the 2024 Applied Networking Research Workshop. Vancouver: ACM, 2024. 81–87. [doi: 10.1145/3673422.3674888]
[27] Wu J, Bi J, Bagnulo M, Baker F, Vogt C. RFC 7039: Source address validation improvement (SAVI) framework. 2013. https://www.rfc-

