Page 411 - 《软件学报》2026年第4期
P. 411

1852                                                       软件学报  2026  年第  37  卷第  4  期


                  [2]   King  S,  Nadal  S.  PPCoin:  Peer-to-peer  crypto-currency  with  proof-of-stake.  2012.  https://people.cs.georgetown.edu/~clay/classes/
                     fall2017/835/papers/peercoin-paper.pdf
                  [3]   Kaur M, Khan MZ, Gupta S, Noorwali A, Chakraborty C, Pani SK. MBCP: Performance analysis of large scale mainstream blockchain
                     consensus protocols. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 80931–80944. [doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085187]
                  [4]   Zhang L, Li QW. Research on consensus efficiency based on practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proc. of the 10th Int’l Conf. on
                     Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC). Guiyang: IEEE, 2018. 1–6. [doi: 10.1109/ICMIC.2018.8529940]
                  [5]   Fu X, Wang HM, Shi PC, Ouyang X, Zhang XH. Jointgraph: A DAG-based efficient consensus algorithm for consortium blockchains.
                     Software: Practice and Experience, 2021, 51(10): 1987–1999. [doi: 10.1002/spe.2748]
                  [6]   Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/bitcoin/
                  [7]   Miller A, Xia Y, Croman K, Shi E, Song D. The honey badger of BFT protocols. In: Proc. of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conf. on Computer
                     and Communications Security. Vienna: ACM, 2016. 31–42. [doi: 10.1145/2976749.2978399]
                  [8]   Pass R, Shi E. Hybrid consensus: Efficient consensus in the permissionless model. 2016. https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/917.pdf
                  [9]   Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Yu S. Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its
                     optimal design. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 275(2): 580–598. [doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.052]
                 [10]   Wu J, Bi J, Li X, Ren G, Xu K, Williams M. RFC 5210: A source address validation architecture (SAVA) testbed and deployment
                     experience. 2008. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5210 [doi: 10.17487/RFC5210]
                 [11]   Li D, Qin LC, Wu JP, Su YY, Xu MW, Shi XG, Gu YN, Lin T. Internet source address verification method based on synchronization and
                     dynamic filtering in address domain. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(10): 21–28 (in Chinese with English abstract). [doi: 10.
                     11959/j.issn.1000-0801.2020289]
                 [12]   de la Rocha Gómez-Arevalillo A, Papadimitratos P. Blockchain-based public key infrastructure for inter-domain secure routing. In: Proc.
                     of the 2017 Int’l Workshop on Open Problems in Network Security (iNetSec). 2017. 20–38.
                 [13]   Xing QQ, Wang BS, Wang XF. BGPcoin: Blockchain-based Internet number resource authority and BGP security solution. Symmetry,
                     2018, 10(9): 408. [doi: 10.3390/sym10090408]
                 [14]   He GB, Su W, Gao S, Yue JR, Das SK. ROAchain: Securing route origin authorization with blockchain for inter-domain routing. IEEE
                     Trans. on Network and Service Management, 2021, 18(2): 1690–1705. [doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3015557]
                 [15]   Li  J,  Cao  JH,  Yang  Y,  Liu  ZT,  Li  Q,  Wang  YY,  Meng  ZL,  Xie  RJ,  Xu  MW.  DeBGP:  Decentralized  and  efficient  BGP  hijacking
                     prevention system. In: Proc. of the 2023 Int’l Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN). 2023. 24–26.
                 [16]   Saad M, Anwar A, Ahmad A, Alasmary H, Yuksel M, Mohaisen D. RouteChain: Towards blockchain-based secure and efficient BGP
                     routing. Computer Networks, 2022, 217: 109362. [doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109362]
                 [17]   Lamport L. Paxos made simple. 2001. https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/paxos-simple.pdf
                 [18]   Lamport L. Generalized consensus and Paxos. Technical Report, MSR-TR-2005-33, Microsoft, 2005. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/
                     research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/tr-2005-33.pdf?msockid=18e24034efce61972d8d50a1ebce67e1
                 [19]   Lamport L. Fast paxos. Distributed Computing, 2006, 19(2): 79–103. [doi: 10.1007/s00446-006-0005-x]
                 [20]   Ongaro D, Ousterhout J. In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. In: Proc. of the 2014 USENIX Annual Technical Conf.
                     Philadelphia: USENIX Association, 2014. 305–319.
                 [21]   Castro M, Liskov B. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proc. of the 3rd Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation.
                     New Orleans: USENIX Association, 1999. 173–186.
                 [22]   Li Q, Xu MW, Wu JP, Zhang XW, Lee PPC, Xu K. Enhancing the trust of Internet routing with lightweight route attestation. In: Proc. of
                     the 6th ACM Symp. on Information, Computer and Communications Security. Hong Kong: ACM, 2011. 92–101. [doi: 10.1145/1966913.
                     1966927]
                 [23]   Li Q, Hu YC, Zhang XW. Even rockets cannot make pigs fly sustainably: Can BGP be secured with BGPsec. In: Proc. of the 2014
                     Workshop on Security of Emerging Networking Technologies. San Diego, 2014.
                 [24]   Cao  JM,  Liu  Y,  Liu  MX,  He  L,  Jia  YH,  Yang  F.  pSAV:  A  practical  and  decentralized  inter-as  source  address  validation  service
                     framework.  In:  Proc.  of  the  29th  IEEE/ACM  Int’l  Symp.  on  Quality  of  Service  (IWQOS).  Tokyo:  IEEE,  2021.  1–7.  [doi:  10.1109/
                     IWQOS52092.2021.9521336]
                 [25]   Yang XY, Cao JH, Xu MW. SEC: Secure, efficient, and compatible source address validation with packet tags. In: Proc. of the 39th IEEE
                     Int’l Performance Computing and Communications Conf. (IPCCC). Austin: IEEE, 2020. 1–8. [doi: 10.1109/IPCCC50635.2020.9391554]
                 [26]   Qin LC, Liu LB, Chen L, Li D, Shi YQ, Yang HB. UniSAV: A unified framework for Internet-scale source address validation. In: Proc.
                     of the 2024 Applied Networking Research Workshop. Vancouver: ACM, 2024. 81–87. [doi: 10.1145/3673422.3674888]
                 [27]   Wu J, Bi J, Bagnulo M, Baker F, Vogt C. RFC 7039: Source address validation improvement (SAVI) framework. 2013. https://www.rfc-
   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416