Page 131 - 《软件学报》2026年第4期
P. 131

1572                                                       软件学报  2026  年第  37  卷第  4  期


                 线性  Transformer 高效地建模全局节点表征, 并在全局和局部视角下将节点表示转换为自身及邻居之间的残差形
                 式以生成数据集无关的通用特征, 最后结合少样本重建学习实现无需目标数据微调的高效检测. 实验表明, GRAD
                 在跨领域基准数据集上优于现有方法. 在本文, 可以发现, 所计算出的残差特征可视为对一阶信息的利用, 所以对
                 于多阶残差信息的有效融合是未来值得探索的内容. 同时, 对于线性                     Transformer, 它仍是基于多层神经网络进行
                 建模, 这扩大了模型规模, 在异常检测这种数据量少的场景下, 增加了模型过拟合的风险. 因此, 利用数据增广技术
                 来扩充训练数据也是未来的研究方向之一.


                 References
                  [1]   Wu ZH, Pan SR, Chen FW, Long GD, Zhang CQ, Yu PS. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Trans. on Neural
                     Networks and Learning Systems, 2021, 32(1): 4–24. [doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386]
                  [2]   Qiao HZ, Tong HH, An B, King I, Aggarwal C, Pang GS. Deep graph anomaly detection: A survey and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. on
                     Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2025, 37(9): 5106–5126. [doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2025.3581578]
                  [3]   Pan JJ, Liu YX, Zheng X, Zheng YZ, Liew AWC, Li FY, Pan SR. A label-free heterophily-guided approach for unsupervised graph fraud
                     detection. In: Proc. of the 39th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Philadelphia: AAAI Press, 2025. 12443–12451. [doi: 10.1609/aaai.
                     v39i12.33356]
                  [4]   Li JD, Dani H, Hu X, Liu H. Radar: Residual analysis for anomaly detection in attributed networks. In: Proc. of the 26th Int’l Joint Conf.
                     on Artificial Intelligence. Melbourne: AAAI Press, 2017. 2152–2158.
                  [5]   Erfani SM, Rajasegarar S, Karunasekera S, Leckie C. High-dimensional and large-scale anomaly detection using a linear one-class SVM
                     with deep learning. Pattern Recognition, 2016, 58: 121–134. [doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.03.028]
                  [6]   Kipf TN, Welling M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv:1609.02907, 2017.
                  [7]   Xiao  SX,  Wang  SP,  Dai  YF,  Guo  WZ.  Graph  neural  networks  in  node  classification:  Survey  and  evaluation.  Machine  Vision  and
                     Applications, 2022, 33(1): 4. [doi: 10.1007/s00138-021-01251-0]
                  [8]   Zhang  MH,  Chen  YX.  Link  prediction  based  on  graph  neural  networks.  In:  Proc.  of  the  32nd  Int’l  Conf.  on  Neural  Information
                     Processing Systems. Montréal: Curran Associates Inc., 2018. 5171–5181.
                  [9]   Ma XX, Wu J, Xue S, Yang J, Zhou C, Sheng QZ, Xiong H, Akoglu L. A comprehensive survey on graph anomaly detection with deep
                     learning. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023, 35(12): 12012–12038. [doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3118815]
                 [10]   Liu YX, Li SY, Zheng Y, Chen QF, Zhang CQ, Pan SR. ARC: A generalist graph anomaly detector with in-context learning. In: Proc. of
                     the 38th Int’l Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver: Curran Associates Inc., 2025. 50772–50804.
                 [11]   Qiao HZ, Niu CX, Chen L, Pang GS. AnomalyGFM: Graph foundation model for zero/few-shot anomaly detection. In: Proc. of the 31st
                     ACM  SIGKDD  Conf.  on  Knowledge  Discovery  and  Data  Mining  V.2.  Toronto:  ACM,  2025.  2326–2337.  [doi:  10.1145/3711896.
                     3736843]
                 [12]   Zhu JW, Pang GS. Toward generalist anomaly detection via in-context residual learning with few-shot sample prompts. In: Proc. of the
                     2024 IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Seattle: IEEE, 2024. 17826–17836. [doi: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.
                     01688]
                 [13]   Zheng WQ, Huang EW, Rao N, Katariya S, Wang ZY, Subbian K. Cold brew: Distilling graph node representations with incomplete or
                     missing neighborhoods. arXiv:2111.04840, 2022.
                 [14]   Zhang JQ, Wang SZ, Chen SC. Reconstruction enhanced multi-view contrastive learning for anomaly detection on attributed networks.
                     arXiv:2205.04816, 2022.
                 [15]   Jin M, Liu YX, Zheng Y, Chi LH, Li YF, Pan SR. ANEMONE: Graph anomaly detection with multi-scale contrastive learning. In: Proc.
                     of  the  30th  Int’l  Conf.  on  Information  &  Knowledge  Management.  Queensland:  ACM,  2021.  3122–3126.  [doi:  10.1145/3459637.
                     3482057]
                 [16]   Tang JH, Li JJ, Gao ZQ, Li J. Rethinking graph neural networks for anomaly detection. In: Proc. of the 39th Int’l Conf. on Machine
                     Learning. Maryland: PMLR, 2022. 21076–21089.
                 [17]   Wu QT, Zhao WT, Yang CX, Zhang HR, Nie F, Jiang HT, Bian YT, Yan JC. SGFormer: Simplifying and empowering Transformers for
                     large-graph representations. In: Proc. of the 37th Int’l Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems. New Orleans: Curran Associates
                     Inc., 2023. 64753–64773.
                 [18]   Wu QT, Zhao WT, Li Z, Wipf DP, Yan JC. Nodeformer: A scalable graph structure learning Transformer for node classification. In: Proc.
                     of the 36th Int’l Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems. New Orleans: Curran Associates Inc., 2022. 27387–27401.
                 [19]   Geisler  S,  Kosmala  A,  Herbst  D,  Günnemann  S.  Spatio-spectral  graph  neural  networks.  In:  Proc.  of  the  38th  Int’l  Conf.  on  Neural
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136